Jump to content

HappySingh88

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

HappySingh88's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/8)

  • First Post Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I find it surprising that "Amere" has been allowed to mask his full identity under a nickname. After all, the court has decreed that his identity and that of the other defendants should be made public. I do not see therefore that there would be anything wrong in disclosing his full name or other aliases - the other defendants have not been able to hide themselves in this way. His exact address of course is another matter as the court has not put any more than a street name for the bail addresses in the public domain. The defendants solicitors argued that the street names should not be published but the court refused.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use