PokeYourPinealGland

9 hours ago, DailyMail said:

.Whether jats are a caste, ethnic group or a race is irrelevant. The Guru's were clear - recognise the human race as one. 

you're right.  i shouldn't have tried to justify. couldn't help it. y'all were going in on jatts lol but you're right brethren 

2 minutes ago, genie said:

 

I drank a nice glass of mango lassi to celebrate his departure from this earth into nark (hopefully).

i shall also partake is such festivities. i might even go around giving homeless people dollar bills today. this is the best news i could have possibly read today. waiting for my mom to get off work so i can call her and we can both enjoy this moment together lol

i was hoping someone would tell me why they have issues with panthpreet singh, apart from the dasam granth issue. but i guess the best reason so far put forward is that the guy (the gurudwara pradhan that he probably doesn't even know on a personal level) stood in front of a republic day of india poster.......

BRO...you can not be serious if you're going to hold something like that against any individual, we don't even know the circumstances of why he's standing there, what formal obligation he had to whom in his small community in Germany. come on man. 

and why is panthpreet singh responsible for someone character just because he asked him to come lecture at a location?? he's doing it for the path, he can't judge each and every gurudwara pradhan he meets.

i know some good pracharaks that came to gurdwaras around where i live and not all the pradhans are the best people. now i shouldn't listen to professor Dhunda because the pradhan who called him is a wretched individual and he should've known and therefore turned his back on the sangat of that city? come one bro.

people want to call out panthpreet singh on being hindu in his past but what about gurpreet from california used to be neeraj kumar??

apart from the whole 'bachitar natak' issue why are you guys mad at panthpreet singh? he does good prachar and is good sikh. what else is the problem with him apart from that issue.

when ranjit singh dhadriawala was young he let people touch his feet and what not thats why people opposed him but over the years he has learned became better and become an exemplary pracharak. as long as a person evolves for the better, you got to give him respect where its due. 

all these pracharaks were there when beadbi of SGGS happened but for sure didn't see gurpreet singh there. just because people have differences in their thought processes, the pro dasam granth group swears up and down that they are the one and only true singhs. 

On 5/25/2017 at 2:14 AM, Akalifauj said:

Funniest post.  This guy is a mixture of 3HO and missionary.  Go on tell us more of your crazy beliefs.  On a different thread this half breed was talking about how he only follows Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.  That lie only lasted for one second.  The irony here,  he's writing this half breed thoughts on a thread asking why people are gullible. The irony doesn't get better than this.  Somebody toss this guy a bone and rub his belly cuz even the dogs are going.....w....t.....f

half breed thought hmm...interesting choice of words. so tell me what offended you so much. because of different in perceptions of how we interpret the beliefs and that only you know and can judge which are right and wrong? or was there another topic in the other thread that got you going. what are you 14? you can't ask questions and have a discussion? whats wrong with missionaries in sikhs? I'm pretty sure the dogs aren't going w..t..f.. that doesn't even make sense loll what does that even mean lol only you are going w..t..f.. because i sense a lack of intellect.

i also think the explanation of keeping our hair told by the elders should run deeper than 'because we are told so' or because its tradition.

its being content with the hukam of nature (or waheguru), which in turn humbles the ego which you need to control to have dar, adab and pyaar of the supreme being anyways. it also controls your lust because you are not trying to look sexy every day to attract the opposite sex. and of course we all know the reason for identity, which makes us stand out therefore making us responsible for our actions.

for those who meditate, some cultures also believe that hair is your antenna to connecting to the universe. that is; if you believe in energy, vibrations and frequency that connects us all in this universe. for example native american used to be the best trackers but when they were took to vietnam, their hair was cut to maintain army regulations and they noted that they end up loosing their 'tracking abilities'. just an example. similarly 'rastafarians' also believe that their hair helps them connect to nature and universe, so they keep their locs. 

thinking out loud here?

i think part of the reason is that our very practical religion has turned ritualistic. i see so many people talking about do this path this number of times and it will be beneficial. these practices lead to hollow beliefs. our 'PAATH' is guidelines to live and think. but if you don't know what the gurbani you're reading means then i don't understand how it could be beneficial. 

people seem to believe that if you do certain paaths that bad things won't happen to you. whereas bad things are the teachers you need to take your conciseness to the next step. sikhi teaches you to be mentally content in good and bad times. if you think nothing bad will happen because you do sukhmani sahib 5 times a day, then its all bad for you from the jump. 

for example (i know I'm about to get heat for this, o well): i still don't understand akhand paaths. people drinking hella strong cha and doing paath super fast and being up all night is not going to benefit anyone. but if we have sehaj paaths, and discussion of gurbani, now thats real saadh sangat. and doing the supreme beings 'sifat salah' in sadh sangat is what will lead to instilling pyaar of his naam in an individuals heart. and without that support you can't make it across "sansar samundar".

i feel like theses ritualistic practices can't build the strength necessary to stick to sikhi. all you need is someone to come along and promise "good luck" and "good fortune" or straight up buying an influential figure of the community out (RSS has become an expert in the buying out of our leaders lol). theres still a lot of true singhs and singhnis out here though.

just a thought...hope no one gets mad at me lol

3 hours ago, chatanga said:

Yes MrSingh you say this but then come out with :

 

 

Why are you wondering this if you study only from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji?

big difference in wondering and or reading/inquiring about something and actually studying and following a guru. hope this point is easy to understand and don't confuse you as much as the previous ones. i like how you addressed and replied with the depth of information to the points i stated though.....

1 minute ago, chatanga said:

 

Yea that has been happening since 1708. Until about 100 years ago, there was no problem. Then some foolish Singh Sabha extremists starting doubts part of Sri Dasme Patshah's Granth and then moved onto Sri Guru Granth Sahib. You need to study more Sheikhyobooty.

i really don't understand your intention of using "sheikhyobooty"

but maybe its those parts of dasam granth that include pornography? maybe? just maybe. i still wonder why it used to be called bachitar natak first. and of course those foolish sings, how dare they try to evaluate a piece of literature that people are trying to put next to their guru 

i only study from Guru Granth Sahib. when i feel like I've mastered every principle and idea of my guru, then ill move forward to other works. but thank you for your concern

i can't understand why the panth is so reckless about these situations. first of all we ONLY have one guru. which is, obviously, guru granth sahib ji. and if someone wants to believe in bachitar natak, AKA dasam granth, thats fine too, but don't try to make it or put it on the same pedestal as our guru. if you feel its authentic then at best its a work of literature of our guru. he didn't make it our 'GURU' for a reason. we only have one guru. this should put the topic to rest. 

i do wonder if the proponents and opponents of dasam granth have thoroughly studied the teachings of Guru Granth Sahib ji, and then compared the thought process of the two and see what our guru says versus what dasam granth says....probably unlikely...but hey lets kill each other over an issue we don't know nothing about because its fun to take sides