JS79

5 minutes ago, OnieFaltoo said:

You think so? That would be very nice. I will postpone my bhakti till then lol!

Well if jhatka is maryada for them... i dont see why theyd disapprove bhangra. They might even release songs on jhatka and dance with the bakre.

29 minutes ago, OnieFaltoo said:

To do no bhakti or to be a very good human. Actually,  I only want to live for today. I want to leave a black mark on this world so no one ever remembers me after I am gone also to convert many to eat, drink and be merry. When I say eat,  I mean eat lots of meat such as cows, monkeys, dogs, sheep, birds, snails, chickens also goats and deers, all in all, anything that has four legs and moves!!  All jhatakked by me.  By drink, I mean, drink many glassiyaan of bournbon whisky, southern comfort, bicardi, vodka, gin, hot buttered rum, tequilla anything that has sharab in it. When I say be merry, I mean bhangra like a jatt  kid from punjab in garish, lurid, multicolored bhangra clothes on. Like so:

 

Or like so :

Or like so:

 

Interesting post 

one day this bhangra might even be considered as bhagti.......

15 minutes ago, Mahakaal96 said:

... you missionary bast*ards are up too.... 

Wow. What a mahaan gursikh you must be to speak so well! Who taught you such beautiful language? Impressive!

I think we know where the majority of the sangat stands. Just open your eyes. Sangat is wise. Dont underestimate the sangat.

These lot want to promote dasam bani yet have no interest in what gury nanak dev ji say. Nanak fikke boleye tan man fikka hoye. Read gurbani ji. 

If you followed the conversation I was not referring to Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Duh. 

15 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

Guru Ka nindak.  Sant Jarnail Singh ji Khalsa would have delivered his right arm to take care of this Guru Ka nindak.

Sant ji would have took care of dhumma and all the taksalis who oppose gurmat. 

Just now, Akalifauj said:

Guru ka nindaks.  

Maharaj matha tekked to guru granth sahib. I 100% agree to dasam bani but not the hindu stories mixed in. My view my opinion. To me, you are a nindak, to you, i am a nindak. Hey ho. 

6 hours ago, Guest Singh said:

He impersonated guru gobind singh maharaj by wearing a kalgi on his head and having people matha tek to him ( dhadrianwale). 

You are mistaken by sirsa wala

He also made his form of 'amrit' 

Dhumma approved it also.

1 hour ago, singhunit said:

I agree, wearing the kalgi and allowing people to matha tek was a huge mistake. This is what I was trying to explain earlier, we hype things too much as the sangat.

On that note Dhumma is no better, who is he to throw his weight around and order the killing of fellow SIKH BROTHERS. You don't see Bhai Guriqbal Singh behaving like that?

There was nothing wrong in that. Two people gave two different khandas and dhadrianwale did not want to dishearten them by not wearink a khanda. They are above one another therefore seem lile a kalgi. It was not rees of maharaj.

Secondly nothing is wrong in matha tek. Some gursikhs bow down to each other. Forget bowing down, Maharaj says 'meri khaloho moajre gursikh handande'. Make my skin into the shoes of those gursikhs!! It is about respect. Yes the sharda we have should be 'he is a gursikh' not 'he is god'. Some kids matha tek to parents. They do not see the mum and dad as god but it is a form of respect. Do we not take asheervaad from our mums? It is not wrong. However Dhumma did this is maharajs hajoori which IS wrong. That is rees of kalgidhar sache patshah.

Thirdly, many many years ago dhadrianwale have stopped people trying to matha tek them because some of us have little brains and cannot gather big concepts.

then listen to gurmat parcharaks who stand by guru granth sshib jis teaching. The ones who have so much khich towards dhan sache patshah:

amazing parchar. Asli guru da singh. He has courage and pyar. He has the qualities others are lacking. 

Well done for attaching the doctored video. There was editing. It is 2 khanda. Its about a decade ago. You seem new to such things carry on doing your research. Then again, how can even a kalgi be too wrong when killings have taken place! 

1 minute ago, chatanga said:

If you have any proof of Harnam Singh doing so then bring it.

Its more lies, First you said Taksal do rituals. But no proof. then You say Harnam Singh paid to have someone killed. No proof provided. Then you say Harnam Singh changed things at taksal. Still no proof. Now you moving onto sarsa wala, and hey presto! No proof again.

 

True missionary supporter. Lies lies and nothing else.

Everything has proof. If i knew youd want to see it i would have created a portfolio. Maybe you genuinely are not aware. Do some research to find the facts. 

1 minute ago, chatanga said:

As I said Harnam Singh has not forgiven him. He doesn't have any kind of authority to do that. Which line of gurmat are you with? The one that says Bhai Lehna took gurgaddi of Giuru Nanak by force? The same one you couldnt bring yourself to oppose ?

Yes he has. The day akal takht gave hukamnama harnam singh gave a biaan saying listen to todays hukamnama especially.

No. The gurmat that maharaj talk of in gurbani. Haha you still think i am a missionary. 

I am not the one who forgave sarsa wala. I side with those who are in line with gurmat. Guru di matt. not some jathebandis matt. 

Just now, chatanga said:

Using Sant on name willingly is a crime? Professor Sarbjit Singh Khalsa uses "Professor" and "Khalsa" on his name willingly. Bhai Panthpreet Singh Khalsa uses "Bhai" and "Khalsa" on his name willingly. Harnam Singh has not killed anyone. "He talks rudely"? Like dhadrianwale then? what gurmat parchar was dhadrian wala doing when he was calling Harnam Singh baggar billa? No kirtan classes have been stopped anywhere. Stop lying. Try and be a Sikh. Of the Guru that is, not your lying missionary professors with "Khalsa" added to their name.

Do you not keep up to date with anything? Wow.

Oh so its okay if its not a crime? As long as its legal? Haha. Oh wait. It is legal because badals his topdog.

I dont agree with using professor.

Khalsa? Yes we are proud to be khalsa so why not write it. 

He killed or he paid to kill.... what difference does it make. 

Baggarbilla isnt rude. Its a fact. 

You love to accuse me of lying lol

3 minutes ago, chatanga said:

Yes, the same Gyani Gurpreet Singh who's presence by itslef scares the missionaries.

To be honest he does look unpleasant and scary. :D

Do i have to take you to mehta to show you? What else do you want me to say. I have given a good list.

No. I think its irrelevant. Whats banning got to do with it. I openly support the majority of dhundas parchar, dhapallis amazing parchar etc. I am not saying anything different. 

You didnt drag it out of me. You asked me specifically. So i replied. As we do. 

Chatanga. 

You were accusing me of lying. 

Yes it is possible that a lier to you may be a mahapursh for me. Possibly. Who knows what kind of people you look up to. 

I have not said anywhere that i believe guru ji ate halal. So you stop lying. I said nothing even close to that. Infact when you specifically asked me look at my responses above in the 4th paragraph i have said i disapprove that. 

One thing? Theres countless. He uses sant on his name willingly. He kills innocent parcharaks. He talks rudely and targets gurmat da parchar. He has stopped kirtan classes taking place there. He thinks he is the only person allowed to say sant jis name. I could go on for a very long time. 

 Thing is you are making me laugh too! Glad we can have fun in this. I NEVER said i believe maharaj fainted. You making up stuff like a typical nowaday taksali. 

And what i do know about you is your maryada and jatha bashing is more important than condeming killings of gursikh parcharaks.

Yes. And maybe sant would have stopped the rituals if gov didnt attack. 

Also, i want to remind you I am not a missionary. But id rather be a missionary than dhummas chamcha anyday.

Current taksalis think they have all the gyan of the panth. Most of them cant even argue without swearing and fabricating lies. Some gyaan aint it.

I dont believe everything missionaries say. Dhumma? He is not panthdardi because a panth dardi would not promote INNOCENT killings. He should be supporting parchar and amrit sanchar. A panth dardi would not forgive sarsa saadh! You say i insult maharaj, however you are supporting the guy who has let sarsa saadh get maafi. Sarsa saadh is who insulted maharaj. Not me. You are contradicting yourself. Sarsa wala copies maharaj and taksals head leader supports the pakhandi and then you think people like me are insulting. Wow you must be really confused god help u. 

And the last things you said, again you created in your own head. Maybe youre seeing things because you are accusing me of things i have not even mentioned! Get some rest perhaps. Dont ask me irrelevant stuff. Dont know where your stories appear from.