Goli Da Vair Sada

wats ur point? i dont understand? r u sayin that sikhs shud not confronted them for wat they do there and let them go on wiv wat they do? also dont judge all singh by ur own standarads, sum chardikala singh will do the job dont worry bou that.

wat r we waiting for? guru gobind singh ji sed that 1 who is a singh ov his will engage an army alone. how many singhs does it take to send a tyrant to dharam raj? its time we started doing things off our own backs. who needs the leadership of man wen we have guru granth sahib ji? wen we r old wiv no teeth, little kes, unable to leave our beds and punjab is in a worser state then it is today we will wish we did sumthing. it would be perfect if all ideologies cud exist together in peace but that wud only be possible if we all believed the same or nufin at all. if we as a people r not willing to fight for our existance then we hav no right to exist at all. there comes a tym wen the bullet has to decide who is right and who is wrong.

jo bole so nihal sat sri akaaalllllllllllllllllllllll

it wud be interesting to here prem and rupinder singh's views on this

in punjab the majority ov ppl dont even want khalistan. why? its cus they dont even kno wat it is to be sikh cus they hav lost there sikhi. no1 givs a crap cus they get taught a distorted version of sikhi. attack taht problem. remembering 1984 is good but if in the future there are no sikhs to remember it no1 will care. wat need to be attcked are those in punjab who will distort sikhi and they youth off punjab need to be shown wat sikhi is. murking off badal wudnt be a bad start, but more needs to be done. wats the point in having a land for the khalsa if there is no khalsa to occupy it. truthfully i think we need to setup sikh instituins from her to teach the youth wat sikhi is then the rest will follow. but its long.

fateh. it aint cus ur dastaar. tie that as tight as u want. it happens to a few friends i have and seems to be common. its cus ur tying ur topnot to tight. do make it o tight. it pulls the hair out. u see it happening wiv black women who do there cornrolls to tight. jus lossen it. it wont make the hair grow back but will stop it gettin worse.

sarbat khalsa declared khalistan in 1986, khalistan is occupied land./ india out

let me turn the question around. why do monay look down on amritharis? why why why why why

dont pretend like it dont happen, they do it more then amritharis do.

the difference is those muslims he helped wernt evil ppl. they fought for wat they believed in. im not sayin the person that got stabbed in at the handsworth mela was evil im jus sayin that every situation is different. rupinder singh is an <banned word filter activated>, ppl on this forum shud kno this by now. hes a pacifist, he may as well be a buddist. (not that there is anything wrong wiv buddism. buddism is alot like sikhi. i say buddism cus they are similar to sikhs only pacists like rupinder singh the <banned word filter activated>)

More of the same bigotry, intolerance, aggressive slandering.

Rupinder is NOT an <banned word filter activated>. He is a good man with an independent mind. He does not deserve to be abused and called names like that, just because someone disagrees with him. Especially in the context of Bhai Kanhaiya, whose message was that even those who fought against Sikhs to oppress them deserved compassion and help afterwards.

Guru Fateh

dont tell me u never heard about mehtab and sukha who chopped off massa rangher head? wat about sukha and jinda who shot genral vaidya? wat about bhai ranjit singh who shot nakli nirankari baba gurbachan? u pik and choose wat u feel. true u shud show love but sumtyms u gotta show force.

Interesting! What I would really like to know is what is the threat to the Panth that Ravinder Powar poses? Is Ravinder Powar comparable to Massa Rangar or Indira Ghandi? How does Ravinder Powar's profile differ from say Mr Pardaan of X Gurdwara who allows alcohol, meat and parties within the Gurdwara premises?

my point exactly, u dont know about the incident just as i dont kno. so why u commenting on it for. its all stiring at the end off the day. my only point is this. sikhi is not a pacisfist way of life. u shud always show love but sumtyms u have to use the sword. but u shud always excercise restraint.

the difference is those muslims he helped wernt evil ppl. they fought for wat they believed in. im not sayin the person that got stabbed in at the handsworth mela was evil im jus sayin that every situation is different. rupinder singh is an <banned word filter activated>, ppl on this forum shud kno this by now. hes a pacifist, he may as well be a buddist. (not that there is anything wrong wiv buddism. buddism is alot like sikhi. i say buddism cus they are similar to sikhs only pacists like rupinder singh the <banned word filter activated>)

More of the same bigotry, intolerance, aggressive slandering.

Rupinder is NOT an <banned word filter activated>. He is a good man with an independent mind. He does not deserve to be abused and called names like that, just because someone disagrees with him. Especially in the context of Bhai Kanhaiya, whose message was that even those who fought against Sikhs to oppress them deserved compassion and help afterwards.

Guru Fateh

dont tell me u never heard about mehtab and sukha who chopped off massa rangher head? wat about sukha and jinda who shot genral vaidya? wat about bhai ranjit singh who shot nakli nirankari baba gurbachan? u pik and choose wat u feel. true u shud show love but sumtyms u gotta show force.

rupinder sorry for calling u an <banned word filter activated>. i shudnt hav done that. im not talking bout the handsworth incident, im talking in general now. sumtyms u need to show ppl love and sumtyms u need to giv them the sword. unless u know everything about the handsworth incident u shud not comment on it. i myself dont know so i dont comment on it. it seems to me that u are a blatant pacifist which is cool. but sikhi is not a pacifist religion. however it is 1 that shud show restraint.

following from the great example set to us by Bhai Kanhaiya. if we see a wounded person, what should a sikh do?

when some Sikhs went directly and complained to Guru Gobind Singh that Bhai Kanhaiya had been resuscitating the fallen enemy soldiers. Guru Gobind Singh summoned Bhai Kanhaiya and explained that he had received a complaint about his actions on the battlefield.

Guruji said, “These brave Sikhs are saying that you go and feed water to the enemy and they recover to fight them again – Is this true?â€

Bhai Kanhaiya Ji replied "Yes, my Guru, what they say is true. But Maharaj, I saw no Mughal or Sikh on the battlefield. I only saw human beings. And, ... Guru Ji, .. they all have the same God’s Spirit? – Guru Ji, have you not taught us to treat all God's people as the same?"

so was it right for sikhs to stop a paramedic attending the stabbed victim at the handworths mela on sunday regardless of what he had done in the past?

the difference is those muslims he helped wernt evil ppl. they fought for wat they believed in. im not sayin the person that got stabbed in at the handsworth mela was evil im jus sayin that every situation is different. rupinder singh is an <banned word filter activated>, ppl on this forum shud kno this by now. hes a pacifist, he may as well be a buddist. (not that there is anything wrong wiv buddism. buddism is alot like sikhi. i say buddism cus they are similar to sikhs only pacists like rupinder singh *mod edited*)

MOD NOTE : Please refrain from personal attacks