Search the Community

So a muslim made a response to the 13 reasons for sikhism by jaswinder singh from sikhs.com The main point the muslim makes is that in Sikhism we claim not look down at non sikhs or see them as inferior(non believers) We also say that all faiths lead to God. But How can this be when we look at things pratically. For instance. Sikhs believe in the concept of rebirth. Muslim believe in heaven and hell. What will apply to the muslim heaven and hell or rebirth? there can only be one truth. For instance the muslim will essentially be punished with rebirth by waheguru and not the muslim god allah. there is only one God. So in all muslims will essentially be governed by waheguru and not allah. so waheguru sees non sikhs as inferior in a way. if we believe all religions lead to god then that must mean there are 6 or 7 Gods. https://www.sikhs.org/art4.htm = 13 reasons for sikhism. below is responce from a muslim against these 13 reasons. "1. There is black; there is white - there is truth; there is falsehood (the absence of truth). People get judged according to the truth by Waheguru, so though what you say sounds nice to hear, in practicality people who disbelieve in Waheguru and act on falsehood will be punished with rebirth. Therefore they are inferior in the eyes of God even if you feel the word inferior sounds too harsh.The fact that Sikhs do not try to spread the message of Sikhi in any meaningful way (beyond sporadic interfaith dialogue meetics or small groups like Basics of Sikhi) is an argument against Sikhi rather than for it. Sikhi is allegedly meant to be the complete truth from God, and the truth is meant to benefit people; rather the religion is largely ethnocentrically limited to the Punjabi diaspora, so the truth remains locked away amongst a community which is slowly losing its religiosity (like the rest of the world religious communities), but it is not replenishing its numbers with any significant number of new converts. The religion won't die out any time in the next 100 years, but liberal secularism will render the majority of the population outside of India into hollow believers with no real grounding in belief, instead simply being heritage.2. Though Sikhi espouses equality, there are some things I would comment on this.(A) Men and women have spiritual equality in other religions too. In terms of wordly rights, it is impractical to have *absolute* equality between men and women as men and women are biologically different and generally speaking have different natural inclinations e.g. men are typicallyfirmer and more rational (that is not to say women are irrational), and women are typically more creative and softer. Subsequently, more men are in the army (as it should be), for example, as they are physically more capable. Even if these exceptions are few, they are exceptions nonetheless, demonstrating that absolute equality is impractical if not impossible.(B) In Sikh history, polygamy has been allowed (even during the Guru's time), and though there is a difference of opinion between Sikh historians, there is credible evidence suggesting that a couple of the Gurus had more than one wife. Admittedly this has never been a widespread practice in the Sikh community in general, though Jagraj from Basics of Sikhi said that it was practiced during times of war, but nonetheless I have not encountered anyone suggesting it is okay for women to marry multiple husbands.3. It may have been the case early on in the path of Guru Nanak, but after successive Gurus and reaching a peak with Guru Gobind Singh, Sikhi evolved from a spiritual path into an organised religion and subsequently developed loads of rituals - air dusting of the Granth, keeping Kesh, dipping a Kirpan in the Prashad, taking shoes off, doing the rounds during Anand Karaj, bowing to the Granth, wearing a Kara, wearing special Kacheh, taking Amrit etc. You may say all of these have practical benefits, but that would be special pleading - the rest of us could explain the spiritual and practical significances of our rituals e.g. the direction of prayer and slaughtering in the name of God (which many Sikhs do not seem to understand properly) just as you would, yet you call them valueless.4. This point is partially covered by my previous points, so please refer to them. If God is not the head of a single religion, and Sikhs do not spread the 'complete truth' that Sikhi is branded as, there is no need for Sikhi - Muslims just need to continue being Muslims sincerely, Jews being Jews sincerely, etc, then we will all meet God with clean hearts. The religion is therefore invalidated and Sikhs are absolved of any duty to encourage righteousness.5. The concept of reincarnation is problematic for Sikhi. The Granth is meant to be the perfected book of God but it contains antithetical concepts such as Hell (in the Saloks of Farid) - and Farid believed in Hell literally as a Muslim. Even though as a Sikh you can interpret Hell metaphorically in order to reconcile it with reincarnation, this only dodges the fact that Farid's intention was for it to be meant literally, therefore the Granth contains things that it does not even teach i.e. a literal Hell with fire and damnation. It is like planting a poisenous tree in your orchard and plucking and selling its poisenous fruit because it looks nice rather than because it is inherently beneficial to one's wellbeing."