kullykhalsa

god being inside everyone i dont find difficult itself to believe but to be god on earth i kind of do (omnipresent, omnipotent, etc) cant be possible can it in human form? (human form in itself is limiting)

wow Jsinghz you really are a child and this is coming from someone who actually agrees with your opinion

Was watching the da vinci code recently and i remembered a certain section regarding 431 Council of Epehsus where they discussed the divinity of christ. I think this revolved around 2 parts, 1 he had a divine spirit in him (jyoti jot) and 2, he was born of a human so couldnt be god just wondering how this relates to our guru's to people view them as god on earth or prophets of god or just great men? Even harder to get around is the fact if they were god on earth who were they praying too?

"If you argue otherwise you are going against Gurmat." I love this line above all = aparrent get out of any reasonable debate. Now while i disagree with infromthevoids point of view he debates it rationally and logically, whereas the replies are lacking. Sikhi for me is a personal understanding of SGGS for me it might mean one thing for you another. Xtremesinghs reply is only valid if he is a brahmgiani or can prove an understanding which is deeper than the rest of us seeing as he alone is able to condemn people as manmukh/gurmukh

thats if you trust the attendees to not use them on each other on election night, fact is guns in gurdwara would do more harm than good. If singhs/singhnia learnt how to use their kirpan/kara as weapons that would be better!

honestly your problem is that you think you are brighter/sharper/more intelligent than the rest of us "brainwashed" massesdo i think false flag acts occur? Yes do i think people with money and influence control foreign policy?Yesbut unlike u for me guru ji has revealed all this its kaljug what do we expect i know im not bothered by the uncovering why organisations/people choose to do what they do more importantly id rather get a better understanding of sikhi!

ok now your just making me laugh no where in my post do i call you stupid or say you need to see a doctor! Yes you are my brother which is why i think your wasting your time with this so many other positive things you could be doing! finally if you really think that that tv shows are called programming to program people i cant help but laugh (in a nice way)

oh yes please regale me with more fanciful stories you read on the net written by an equally sad/jobless internet warrior. Im not willing to listen because all your sources are rubbish you logical rational is irrational you still dont understand simple concepts like the slippery slope fallacy where you have made one small connections and let it evolve into a conspiracy and you will not do any legitimate research uk gun crime is much lower then us gun crime simple answer is our gun control (and even we dont have it fully under control). If you believe that taking guns away takes away our freedom then gie everyone a small nuclear bomb where does it stop? you are entitled to your opinion but stop reposting links to utter tripe!

think we can all agree to close this thread. The fact you believe gun crime isnt lower in countries where guns are banned shows how little research you have done. The theorists will always find a coincidence and turn it into a fact ever heard of the slippery slope fallacy. I find a lot of people who believe in this illuminati stuff just want someone to blame

not offence not2cool2argue but i dont think you should be handing out advice if you cant spell schizophrenia

Wow at the tangent you have gone off at. This "new world order" rubbish has been around for years with people making links wherever they can. As for your "guns are good" tripe well some very simple research will show you that countrys that have strict gun laws generally see less gun crime per 100,000. No doubt if you were in the gurdwara you would have saved everyone. Not the time for this bs agenda...heart goes out to all affected by the wisconsin tragedy

guys can you use the other thread op has asked a completely different question and hijacking the thread is not very clever

harvindersingh makes a great post above about teh fact bhagats included in bani have been of different religions. also think the post above by uklondonsikh is worth delving into regarding each persons set of circumstances...i.e the chance of a third world poor african gettin to sachkand when they have never even heard of sikhi??? As for the discussion of kaljugi and united i find it is hard to understood the abrahamic religions one because they have more history and due to that are open to my bias (re- time and attitude and social changes), 2 as a religion grows it becomes richer or individuals do u can see it in sikhi where ppl try to change bits of bani and maryada. Finally we are all learners on this earth hard for us to judge other religions when we are all still not fully able to understand our own

core concept of all abrahamic religions is the belief in 1 god (sounds familiar) If you read other scriptures you can see in them that essentially the core message is the same be kind, be good, do good deeds out of the worlds major religions sikhi is similar to most of their core principles I think the analogy your using is flawed the correct analogy to use would be that all religions followed properly and with pyaar will get you an A, Sikhi is essentially pass plus easier/quicker to get an A in

http://www.sikhsangat.com/Index.php?/topic/67610-getting-to-god/ Use above link for the tangent we went on, Seth wish you good luck and remember take the plunge and check out your local gurdwara and ask lots of questions

this is a post carrying on from a previous post in gupt section I was always under the impression that sikhi pescribed to the opinion that if your a good sikh christian muslim then you will get to god(sachkand) I do not believe that sachkand is full of only sikhs; or only accepted people 500 years ago Opinions welcome this is a place to debate

p.s an even harder concept to get your mind around is that we treat SGGS as a human being not as a "book" as stated above. please go to your local temple and ask as many questions as you wish! The one thing about sikhism that is different to other religions is the respect for all other religions our guru points out that being a good sikh, christian , muslim etc all lead you to the one god. There is no absolute proof of any god so no one can answer your question, but if your looking for rational check out pascals wager theory(again not just applicable to sikhism)

Chips and beans and the sports day dont forget that. To be honest its not cool to hook up at camp but lets be honest id rather singhs met singhnia at a camp rather than speed dating/clubs/pubs etc shows your both interested in the same stuff!

i think everyones realised what a joke LAXMAN is! Your IQ stats are joke 5:1 isuntrue in fact IQ is very close between genders although men are higher there is a higher standard deviation for males as well. On top of that you must take into account that women are generally discouraged from higher education in many parts of the world Women do give birth and raise children they are as influential as men, and have generally been excluded from joining old boys clubs such as the army Finally regarding strength i know enough singhnia who would be able to kick the <banned word filter activated> out of you! p.s dont ever drop a when your married as you would have to go pesh immediately, sounds like you have a dirty mind that you are struggling to control. also im sure the fact you dont have a female friend is based more on females not wanting to be your friend.

the older singhs are getting younger singhs to dress with no modesty? you make a valid point on some of the issues but singhs and singhnia talking at camps seriously how do you expect to run a camp without both genders being able to talk to each other. Although i disagree with the concept of "hooking up" at sikh camp where else are sikh guys and girls going to meet etc

Haha optimal ruler I have no doubt you have done well in something's but I guarantee you are nowhere near the best Sikh basketball player/lawyer/footballer but your ego has made you think you are! I'm also 100% sure a lot of singhnia would beat you at a lot of things u think your good at! Ps your comments on 1984 show your lack of optimal research and optimal rational thinking!

this thread and the comments cant be serious surely!

i write all my points in exclamations nothing to gripe about in the same way you write in a condenscending manner! im not angry just dissappointed in a generation that cant be bothered to do even a bit of research into posts before posting! Please highlight where i have insulted our sisters? please make points based on what you can read above not just what you imagine in your head! "I don't care if the urine comes from the bladder or somewhere else - I say its not clean because of what it comes out of. now i didnt mention placenta, you said its unclean because of what it comes out off so please explain

Honestly take some biology classes as you seem completely unaware of some basic concepts. "I did compare periods to urine. This is pathetic. I don't care if the urine comes from the bladder or somewhere else - I say its not clean because of what it comes out of. Does everything need to be spelt out to kids?" I can even understand what point your trying to make with the above. Again biology 101 where do you think period blood comes from? Unclean based on what it comes out of...do you know how women give birth? Please give more of your opinions on the forum this isnt meant to put you off just hopefully makes you think before you post a simple google would have answered some of the basic premises you are missing!