Jump to content

NiddarSingh

QC
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. WJK WJKF I was waiting for a topic to be put up on here but i think nobody seems to know what happend last sunday at smethwick gudwara in birmingham..... The assitant treasurer Gurdev Dhalliwal was caught stealing £200 while counting the weekly taking on sunday 21st this month. I ask benti of sangat what should be done with this thief. This guy Dhalliwal is a known liar and fraud....he has been found telling lies in court while taking oath in the name of our Guru. He is a know supporter of Ravinder Power who was notourious for his "I KILLED the KHALISTAN movemnt in the uk"statment in India. Dass ask's the wider sangat what to do with this thief. WJK WJKF
  2. I think she had done an OK job but there is too much to put into an hour show but still.................what was that about his speechs being burnt first tym i had herd about that lol. And that photo of "His Shaheedi Roop" that was the first time I had seen that one can some one up that plz??? I know this maybe should be put in a new thread but i cnt be botherd.....was Indira death worth the deaths of our brothers and sisters in dehli???
  3. Admin Note: No disrespect to any Panthic Jathebandi will ever be tolerated on this forum. You are now under moderation.
  4. LIDDER SINGH, IVE NOT CLAIMED TO BE A MEMBER OF ANY JATHA AT ANY TIME, AND THERE IS NO NEED TO HUMOR ANY BRAVE AND TRUE GURSIKH WHICHEVER JATHA THEY BELONG TO, THE QUESTION NOW ARISES WHICH JATHA DO U BELONG TO, AND ANYWAY ANSWER MY QUESTION TO THE BELOW QUOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO REASONABLE ANSWER HAS BEEN GIVEN WHY THE WILLENHALL PROGRAM ORGANISERS AND SUPPORTERS ARRANGED THE PARKASH OF DASAM GRANTH UNDER THE SAME PALKI AND ON THE SAME LEVEL AS SAHIB SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI AND THEN CHANGED THE PARKASH OF DASAM GRANTH AFTER THE BHOG TO LOWER AND DIFFERNT PALKI THE DAY AFTER!!!!!! AGAIN
  5. NO REASONABLE ANSWER HAS BEEN GIVEN WHY THE WILLENHALL PROGRAM ORGANISERS AND SUPPORTERS ARRANGED THE PARKASH OF DASAM GRANTH UNDER THE SAME PALKI AND ON THE SAME LEVEL AS SAHIB SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI AND THEN CHANGED THE PARKASH OF DASAM GRANTH AFTER THE BHOG TO LOWER AND DIFFERNT PALKI THE DAY AFTER!!!!!!
  6. WHY WAS THE PALKI CHANGED FOR DASAM GRANTH AT THE WILLENHALL PROGRAM A DAY AFTER IT WAS UNDER THE SAME PALKI AS SSGSJ???????????????
  7. IT WAS NOT DONE ON THE SAME PALKI OR ON THE SAME LEVEL THOUGH LIDDAR SINGH!!!!!!!!
  8. SORRY LIDDER SINGH, IM NOT WORTHY OF UR REGAL GENTLEMANS LANGUAGE. BUT WHY WAS PARKASH OF DASAM GRANTH CHANGED TO DIFFERENT PALKI AFTER THE BHOG??????????????????
  9. IM STILL WAITING FOR A WORTHY REPLY, NOT ANY TEXTS FORM A BOOK, OR PAINTINGS THAT ARE DONE BY ENGLISH PEEPS AFTER THE TIME OUR GURUS PROCLAIMED SAHIB SRI GRANTH SAHIB JI AS OUR ONE AND ONLY GURU.
  10. WOW A PICTURE SHOWING TWO PARKASH. DOES THIS MEAN THAT EVERY PICTURE THAT IS OUT THERE THAT IS TRUE OR NOT TRUE, WE CAN USE TO PROMOTE OUR THOUGHTS AND IDEALS TO EVERYONE.
  11. LETS NOT FORGET THE POINT THAT PARKASH OF DASAM GRANTH WAS DONE ON THE SAME LEVEL AND UNDER THE SAME PALKI AS SAHIB SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB JI. NO ONE DISRESPECTS THE BANI OF SAHIB SRI GURU GOBIND SINGH JI, AKJ RESPECT THE BANI OF SAHIB GURU GOBIND SAHIB JI TOO THATS WHY THEY DO NITNEM FULLY LIKE EVERY OTHER JATHA.
  12. INDER SINGH WAS U WATCHING THE SAME CHANNEL AND NOT CARTOON NETWORK, EVERYBODY SAW THE PARKASH WAS ON THE SAME LEVEL AND UNDER THE SAME PALKI. IT WAS ONLY ON THURSDAY WHEN THIS BEABDI CHANGES TO A DIFFERENT LEVEL AND DIFFERENT CANOPY. UR A FOOL LIDDER SINGH. HOW CAN U SAY THESES FALSE THINGS, IS IT BECAUSE U KNOW U DID A WRONG AND THEN TRIED TO CORRECT IT?
  13. again khalistan zindamad, wot makes a certain person a member of a jathebandi. dhesi and deol are members of bsc. just because they agree and disagree of certain people does not or does make them a member. if u had the backing of the majority and addressed the problem in a appropiate manner then it would had been screened constanly I MAKE MY POINT AGAIN PARKASH ON A SAME LEVEL OF SSGGS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. IT IS THE SAME WHEN THESES FAKE BABA SIT ON THE SAME LEVEL IT IS BEABDI.
  14. inder singh u should not slander jathas that are not on the same level as u, whether they are right or wrong u have no reason to make theses points. it is the same when on a certain thread people were calling the taksal, dumdummy taksal. its not nice grow up inder singh remember when over 50 taksal peeps came to a certain meeting to confront two.yes only two represenatives regarding the willenhall program, did u vote on this too?
  15. bh force is right in many points, but one i dont agree on is the televised point If the organisers put in as much effort into pushing the sikh channel, ( whether they did not or did want to show parkash) into screening constant pictures of parkash im sure they could had. Sikh channel gets most of its money out of donations, and im sure the organisers donated a considerable amount to sikh channel, so pushing there point across to the sikh channel organisers would not had been a problem if they truely believed in what they did. instead of certain peeps making cyber threats to people who raised the issue on the program they could had Forced the channel to screen the parkash and not kick in the sikh channel van.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use