WaljinderSingh

Like everyone else I don't know what his actual views (because we're denied the opportunity to hear it) but I would imagine he would agree with both you and me in the sense that Dasam Granth has some truly wonderfull features to it in terms of being a warrior...understanding weapons and the nature of weapons etc. I'm pretty sure however, that his only viewpoint is that it wasn't written by Sri Gobind Singh Ji. As a family unit, me, myself and wife read the scriptures daily to our kids and teach them of life from it. There are however, at least a few things from Dasam Granth that a parent could never repeat to his children and frankly would smack his or her children upside the head if they ever uttered such language and is indeed of a nature that cannot be repeated here on this forum where children visit and read. And I think (none of us know so we can only think and guess), perhaps, thats what this fella dhanda is trying to get at. Perhaps he is merely trying to ask how it is possible that Guru ji, who was most perfect, most moral, most upright, a master of poetry and verse, could have written something that would get each of us banned from this forum for being sexually vulgar if we ever repeated it or wrote it here. Isn't he entitled to ask that question and raise that point on an intellectual level ?

Didn't you see his video where he beats Jaap Sahib bani with Sticks?

Regarding Triya-Chritr, there's no vulgarity in it but stories which must be read in context they were written. They are important for any Kingdom to flourish.

I'm not arguing with you on any point you make there because...I'm not either on your side nor his. I choose a position once I hear the facts. I...indeed all of us....are being denied the opportunity to hear the facts.

But.....going back to what you just said, can you explain to me how and why it would be in the RSS (and indeed all right wing Hindu and Indian nationalists) to drive Sikhs away from certain scriptures that praise Hindu gods and is, in all essence, Hindu in nature ? Surely it would be in RSS's (and indeed all right wing Hindu and Indian nationislts) to ensure Sikhs cling on to an unbreakable tie with Hindusim ?

Any establishment would not like anyone to stand up against them. Dasam bani lifts the spirits and gives bir ras to whoever reads it. Breaking away Sikhs from Dasam bani would not have been easy in one go so they tried to attack bit by bit...

If RSS told you not to believe Dasam bani you would would not pay heed.

To do this they (goi) first tried successfully bribe or buy people studied from the missionary college to drive Sikhs away from Dasam bani and amrit.

Darshan rogi was one of the few missionary parcharak who preached Chatrio-paakhiaan and Bachitar natak himself and was actually fully pro Dasam during 1980's and had a huge following.

Having been closely watched by agencies he was then approached by Rajiv Gandhi govt. He sold himself. He was gifted a petrol station in Ludhiana and later managed to settle him in Canada. From 1996 till now the missionary college Ludhiana is run by goi through sell outs.

They trick you to believe what they say because Sikhs became generally anti-establishment and would believe any conspiracy even if it does not make any sense.

Hope you got the gist.

^does that imply rss are bunch of fools?

I agree that white supremacists are equally if not more dangerous and any potential attack by them in the future shouldn't be ruled out - They have done it in the past..

German police has confirmed the two who were responsible for the act were closely related to Daesh.

http://www.bild.de/regional/ruhrgebiet/explosion/anschlag-auf-sikh-hochzeit-polizei-nimmt-zwei-verdaechtige-fest-45476108.bild.html

Most of us would certainly like to know their intentions behind the attack.

Dhunda knows himself that he has no stand on anti-Dasam ideology. If he had, he would have welcomed any invitation to debate any of prominent parcharak who is pro -Dasam.

Anyone here who has links with him directly or indirectly, tell him not to duck down and have the guts to accept 'a' challenge.

Such crap written its embarassing! So according to the gangu lawyer in the article ranjit singh gifted the brits with the diamond after the wars......So let me get this straight, after dying in 1839, ranjit singh came back frm the dead 11yrs later and gifted the brits the diamond? Wow i knew ranjit singh was a special man but not that special. Also it then dispicably states how ranjit singh gave it to the brits for the HELP THEY GAVE in the sikh wars? WHAT THE F*** is this d!ckhead cow p!$$ drinker goin on about? So ranjit singh supposedly rewarded his enemies for destroying his own empire and that too as a dead person? We all know hindus r re-writing history, but this is a new low.

Apparently all major news channels in India are quoting that d**& head. Tells you about their credibility, doesn't it?

^ I think tying or not tying shouldn't be point of discussion. At least not in this topic?

Please continue if you feel otherwise

It would be great if we could get scanned copies of some of the hand-written angs (be it Baba Banda Singh or Baba Gurbaksh Singh ji DDT).

JSinghz bro - yes they are. They are trying to change Sikh principles and Gurbani from the inside. An enemy attacking from outside is very recognizable and RSS hasn't done anything to hurt us yet whereas these missionaries are highly dangerous. They're trying to cause 'permanent' divisions in Sikhi - a direct attack on Sri Akaal Takhat Sahib, Guru Maryada and Bani of our Gurus.

Well said. Because missionaries (English term) are in Sikhi sroop it's more difficult to identify them and hence more dangerous. Btw most of rss bashing is done by missionaries. If you say a word against them (fake missionaries) they will call you someone affiliated to RSS.... messed up

http://sikhsangat.org/2016/sangat-vows-unity-after-chaos-caused-by-dhundha/

There you go. Dhunda's efforts are going in vain.

If there is the slightest kernel of truth in this story, it's that some dirty Ahmed has ensnared some Punjabi harlot to do his dirty work for him. Not a Sikh in any way.

It's interesting to know why they needed to identify the person as a Sikh with no evidence. As I said DM along with few others (mirror etc) are dodgy and not a reliable news source.

As said before, if he has any following it's because spreading DHUND - In dhund people normally do not realise where they are heading.

Dailymail and mirror of UK have reported what goi told them :Canadian Sikh woman an isis agent. Note this comes after Canadian PM is ready to offer full apology to Sikhs for the Komagata Maru incident in the house of commons.

Btw dailymail = daily-FAIL.

NEVER BELIEVE WHAT THIS CRAP NEWS EVER SAYS. IT'S ALWAYS BS

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3535635/Are-Kate-William-targeted-ISIS-Delhi-Police-hunt-female-jihadi-suspected-travelling-Indian-capital-launch-attacks-Royal-tour.html

Sikh-Canadian-Jihadi ??

If ever someone is going to buy this cr@p.

Really we should replace the first letter of his name with a G

I assume that's not the first name ..

Dhunda spreading DHUND (dust-fog)

He/she can do whatever they like to verify it lol. You just have apology ready ?

Overconfidence

Lol if youre that convinced that me and Quantanvious are the same person, get a mod to run an IP address check. You can apologize for the false accusations afterwards.

I will surely do it at some point. BTW IP address can be changed without clever tricks so don't tell me it depends just on that. An administrator knows what to check and what not to to verify...

You have zero evidence of this lol. So many Sikhs throw around "agent" accusation like its no big deal. Dont like someone? Label them an agent!

Of course now youll accuse me of being a follower of these men, but im not a follower of ANY baba, I just support rationality.

But what so called rationality is there in denying Gurbani such as Jaap Sahib, Svaiya and Chaupi Sahib? Or naam simran which is the soul of Sikhi? Or how about denying concepts that are mention through out Gurbani such as reincarnation.

These so called parcharaks and their philosophy is pure atheism.

I never said said any of that is rational or that Dhunda is a rational person. Hence I am not a follower or supporter of any baba. Only one Sant I support and that is Sant Jarnail Singh ji.

I never said all are pakhandi, or even most/few are pakhandi. But there is one and only from our era that personified the Saint-Soldier ideology of our Gurus.

What are the anti Sikh activities?

You are seriously trolling here

I shouldn't have issues with people having multiple accounts but it amuses me if they put up question(s) with one and then answer them with another - As if talking to themselves is regarding as some sort of achievement.

Get a grip bro ? Lol. You must have paranoia issues.

Should I go ahead or not? Let me know

But what so called rationality is there in denying Gurbani such as Jaap Sahib, Svaiya and Chaupi Sahib? Or naam simran which is the soul of Sikhi? Or how about denying concepts that are mention through out Gurbani such as reincarnation.

These so called parcharaks and their philosophy is pure atheism.

This ^.

There is enough circumstantial evidence that they all are agents.