Jump to content

JSinghnz

Members
  • Posts

    2,666
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by JSinghnz

  1. 35 minutes ago, GuestSingh said:

    why does this even need to be asked?

    as already said above, we're supposed to view them as mothers, sisters and daughters...and law of nature dictates we defend and protect our 'blood' as well as the dignity of the entire sikh nation..

    but when these girls call themselves 'sikh' but cant stop fooling around with every outsider race imaginable coz theyre too weak to keep respect/discipline for their body and just wanna have fun all the time with no interest in the blood shed for sikhi, they dishonour our name, tarnish our image and bring shame on us all.

    and its important to remember that dating is a western concept that does not exist in sikhi, therefore no 'sikh' should be dating anyone.

    like a white bedsheet, the woman becomes stained forever with her dirty deeds...

    thats why it should bother us...what other 'sikh' girls do.

    And the man because snow white pure when he does dirty deeds!

     

     

     

  2. 22 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

    Anyone else feel more attracted to other caste Sikhs then their own community women?

    I know there is no caste in Sikhism. But in search of a better word. 

    I dont know why, but I find opposite caste girls more attractive then my own so called 'caste'. I think its due to them looking different and having different physical attributes and looks.

    Ie the girls of my own community are very beautiful, dont get me wrong. But I am slighly put of by them as they look so similar to me and hence find slightly repelled. ie being people of the same appearance and looks. 

    When I see other caste Sikh girls I definnantly feel more attracted to them as they look different and more unique.

    But doubt I would ever marry someone of another caste as it would cause big issues. 

     

     

    Another point less post by a brainwashed casteist. 

  3. Heaps of times the Admins of this website have made it loud and clear that this is a Sikh website and abusive language will not be tolerated here. This message has fell on deaf ears on some members here who have continued with their abusive language against senior members of our forum and they are not even on quality control.

    Admins benti to do the needful please.

  4. 4 hours ago, Singh1989 said:

    To this I'd like to add, it is rehat to study n learn from Quran, Bible n Gitas/ Puranas.

    And in SGGS "It's a great sin to slander other faiths," "Puran, Quran are not false but the preachers are." Harnaam Singh's vision is proof Jesus, Mohammed were saints. I doubt they would've been blessed with a spiritual form if they wont.

    I often wonder who started rumours "Mohammed pedo," or "Jesus not fully blessed" etc. Thousands of years passed since their time. It'll be interesting to see how our history of Guru Sahibs will b portrayed in next 1000 years! (Started by our "Sikhs" bro n sis, of course).

    Yes sure lot for you to learn from bible, just like below golden words of wisdom:

    Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to the good and gentle but also to the cruel.” (1 Peter 2:18)

     

    Another blood-curdling tale from the Book of Judges, where an Israelite man is trapped in a house by a hostile crowd, and sends out his concubine to placate them:

    “So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. At daybreak the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight. When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold. He said to her, ‘Get up; let’s go.’ But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set out for home.” (Judges 19:25-28)

     

    Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide."

    It is called herem, and it means total annihilation. Consider the Book of 1 Samuel, when God instructs King Saul to attack the Amalekites: "And utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them," God says through the prophet Samuel. "But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey."

    When Saul failed to do that, God took away his kingdom.

    https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788

     

     

  5. 4 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

    Jesus was the chosen one and is the saviour of the white man. 

    As Sikhs we see all religions as good that can help people find God. So we should not criticise other faiths. 

    Jesus was a true prophet and messiah

    Amen and may jesus bless you.

     

    Good joke. The chosen one and the saviour of the white man was not a white man himself.

    You are one brainwashed carol singing cookie for sure.

  6. 58 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

    Why not talk about something that exist?. That is like trying to brush something away and pretend it is not a issue in Sikhism. It is actually quite imformative. All Sikhs are considered low if you follow the caste system by hinduism. So its actually quite funny how Sikhs argue who is the best caste wgen we are all viewed as low according to the hindu system. 

     You are definitely not a Sikh. You are a somebody who is stuck in the hindu casteist mindset.

    That why I said post your cr@p on a hindu website.

  7. 2 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

    ?

    "My ancestors originate from a high status caste... but it's not important. Just remember that I do originate from a high status caste."

    If only your mental faculties were high status, Big T. 

    He is beyond repair?

  8. 2 hours ago, puzzled said:

    calm down woman

    if you read the whole thing then you would know that i said "Not sure how true all this is but i have read it elsewhere online as well 

    i never stated it as a fact 

     

    I read online that you are still puzzed as that  you are a man or a woman or  a bit of both.

  9. 4 hours ago, puzzled said:

    He died penniless because he spent all his money on alcohol, gambling and prostitutes. He was a sex addict and addicted to gambling as well. He met his daughters once a year because most the year he was in bed with Wh0res.  His wife was neglected and depressed and started drinking heavily and died of alcoholism. His daughters had a very neglected childhood 

    Doesn't exactly sound like a man on mission to me.

    You probably got your history from the Punjabi movie made about him staring satinder sartaaj, that's where your kind get most of their history from. 

    And you get brainwashed by nonsense history  written  by dimwits like you.

  10. 4 hours ago, puzzled said:

    I read a biography on Maharaja Ranjit Singh by kushwant singh I think, not to sure. But I said that Ranjit Singh beheaded his own mother at the age of 14 because he caught her with another man, he killed the man too.  His father Mahan singh died when Ranjit Singh was really young. 

    Not sure how true all this is but i have read it elsewhere online as well 

    A lot of the misl sardars used to have dancing girls too, I guess in those days men with status and wealth had a right to women and stuff like that 

    YOU SURE GET TO READ LOTS OF RUBBISH. NEXT TIME YOU POST CR@P HERE ,FOLLOW IT UP WITH SOME AUTHENTIC SOURCES!

  11. 30 minutes ago, puzzled said:

    Yeah true, but I think his daughters were better than him. Despite being brainwashed they started discover their real identity. Sophia even said in her will that she wants to be cremated and wants her wealth sent back to girl schools in punjab. 

    Bamba even started living in Lahore and and gave some of her jewellery at harmandir sahib like Her grandfather used to. 

    I honestly think Maharaja duleep singh wasn't fighting for his people but for himself. He wanted his father's wealth for himself I think 

    Can you STOP distorting history.

    Where on earth do you come up with such rubbish theories that Maharaja Dalip Singh was fighting for himself and wanted his father's wealth.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use