Khalistanisinghni
-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Posts posted by Khalistanisinghni
-
-
5 hours ago, jkvlondon said:
Correction GURSIKHS are loved by Guru ji ... you are a gursikh first and foremost your allegiance is to Guru Granth Sahib ji and Guru PANTH ji (that is ALL gursikhs). Jathe are low down on the consideration just like skin colour, nationality etc REHIT and Shudh Hirda come higher than that , that is what Guru ji sees .
That statement meant: Taksalis who follow the maryada are loved by guru ji, Sant giani gurbachan singh ji revealed their respect and love for the jatha Singhs.
Sampardhas aren't even a problem. Because at the end day, most students come out as gursikhs.
it in no way implied Guru ji doesnt love other gursikhs.
1 -
1 hour ago, guruvah said:
Regarding your accusation on me as a 'missionary'. I am actually pro- Dasam Bani & consider missionaries as nindaks of Satguroo.
Missionaries being nindaks of Naam & Gurbani have been cursed in various places in gurbani.
Why hate people who whom SatGuroo himself has cursed due to their deeds?
If anything, you just demonstrated how hate fueled viciously slanderous modern day taksalis are. Nor do you see any shame of accusing other Sikhs of heresy without evidence.
When you release hate out to the world, you are unlikely receive any love from others either.
Then Taksalis like you wonder in threads like this. "Why people dont like us?
"
Seriously
How is it hate to teach people the importance of maryada? I don't people like you. Taksalis use both love, encouragement and force (to some extent) and people like you degrade them. Who cares if you are pro-dasam Granth, even dhunda says he believes in dasam granth.
Taksalis (most of them) are loved by guru ji, needless of your love.
Btw The mughal emperors were also led to the the wrong side by the lord, guru ji fought them. Injustice is within hukam but mahapurkhs fight against it as well. STOP USING YOUR NARROW MIND TO INTERPRET GURU JI's BANI. Thank you.
0 -
4 hours ago, guruvah said:
Having seen it with my own eyes over the years.
Taksalis in general, if not all are always occupied with maryada controversies.
Then there is hate for other who do mool mantar till Gurparsad/'shorter rehraas' or those who follow a different maryada than theirs.
What I find most disturbing is the "hate" modern day taksalis harbor in their heart for other Sikhs who maybe different from them in 1 way another. AND think there is nothing wrong with it.
Just look at the way AJNALA(video) is spewing foul language on others in this thread.
What is the point of fighting the whole panth about mool mantar? when even "NIRVAIR" from mool mantar doesnt even sink into your heart ?
Being a Taksalan yourself. Just look at the language you used in the last sentence. You have the "US vs. them/the others mentality" . Just pause for a second. and >REFLECT<
---------------------------
I wasnt born into a Gursikh family. When I learnt about sikhi, i was mostly around taksalis.
Nothing fascinated me about Sikhi.
If I look at the taksalis i have got to know in my life. Nothing in them, inspires me to be a better Sikh.
Its when I left Taksali circles , its when I realized what Gurmat Naam was through dya of Satguroo.
Guru Granth Sahib Maharaj became my reason to want to be a Sikh, not any group.
All I have is:
1. Go listen to katha by taksalis
2. Go check the meaning of versus
3. Taksalan isn't a word
4. You sound missionary, congragulations. (Taste your medicine)
0 -
3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:
sorry Bhen ji I don't understand ... I am speaking from actual real people experience not videos
I mean I have been watching videos of those anti-raagmala and saying all sorts of things to prove their point. So I came up a "generalisation" which according to your experience is false
0 -
Baba ji ??????
0 -
2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:
Please Akj and Ragmaala - it is not correct to state ALL jatha members feel the same , many still recite ragmaala it is left as an individual decision.
Watching the videos of the wrong members
0 -
For a month? For an average it takes years/centuries to get something but when you compare a month with jaap to the first day you started off, increased concentration (even for just a minute)
0 -
WJKK WJKF,
it is sometimes funny how majority of the Sikh kaum loves bhindranwale, claim to believe that are sant/mahapurkh but very few actually follow them?
in local area, some uncles continuously ask kavishers to sing about bhindranwale and the same uncles invite anti-gurmat parchariks to the area.
Taksal is currently not following the maryada left by either Baba Thakur Singh ji or other mahapurkhs of taksal. Other jathebandis like AKJ don't accept raagmala. While some aren't to believe Charitropkyan to be bani.
are we lying to ourselves when we call them "sant baba jarnail singh ji khalsa bhindranwale"? They surely contributed to the panth and have clarified on other points.
0 -
6 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:
You've yet to answer me, don't throw huge allegations like that around with 0 evidence.
Missed your comment/reply. Your assumption that I have 0 evidence already says you aren't waiting for an answer because obviously I didn't go and see it. It's an allegation in the hazuri of guru maharaj and not needed unless known to be true. Simply stating Bhai ajnala isn't lying.
0 -
That is why unity is sometimes important, had they stood together, the government/rss won't be easily fooling them.
0 -
I think it is better if we simply attract more people to the gurdwara. Instead of making Sunday the gurdwara day, perhaps if the youth was taught of the importance of sewa or they could use their spare time to read from the books/granths at the gurdwara, the atmosphere would be different and sangat/guru ji would be protected (though it is maharaj ji protecting us and themselves)
1 -
5 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:
Perhaps it wasn't meant literally, or that one day there will be that many? Because as of right now, 2017, I'm quite confident there haven't been that many Sikhs.
Ask maharaj ji in that case. Shaheed Singhs are in millions and it is hardly doubtful that there arent 96 crore of them! Khalsa Raj after all, we can only ask for naam simran
0 -
1 hour ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:
I'm sure even if we count every single Sikh that ever lived, we still would be no where near 960 million lol.
Not about what you think, about what maharaj ji has said
0 -
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:
Dhadrianwale has consistently been besieged and harassed by punjab police during all major events whilst Badal was in charge, he is plain speaking and does call out people with dodgy behaviour . He was the only one to speak up for Jaswinder Singh and his brother who were falsely blamed for the beadbhi of Guru ji.
Ajnala started off OK dealing with beadbhi issues etc but since he was placed as Jathedar I haven't seen him doing anything in a positive light , just being 'salty' to others. I would have thought he would have more power to his elbow to get the Beadbhi stopped.
Why Taksali brothers are being this way is not clear , they should be able to resolve the issues peaceably and in a civilised manner .
Agreed
but after the beadbi his parchar changed and he started sounding like panthpreet. Perhaps because he supported dhadrianwale.
at the same time, the actions a few "taksalis" has altered the image and reputation of the other in punjab and outside.
1 -
13 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:
96 crore? 1 crore = 10 million, so 96 crore = 960 million
Are you asserting that there are 960 million amritdhari Sikhs? That is beyond ridiculous.
0 -
6 hours ago, jkvlondon said:
there are some who are being illogical and also aggressive to specific people e.g. Dhumma, Ajnala, Jagowale All badmouthing Dhadrianwale this came after Dhadrianwale called Dhumma a sarkari sant because of the way he has been acting in relation to Badal /RSS people (compliant and servile) which is open for all to see. Then a murder plot was hatched against Dhadrianwale because apparently questioning Dhumma is equivalent to attacking the Taksal. IT'S NOT the Taksal is Guru ji's creation to stand for all time whereas this guy is not.
This is the starting point of the attack on Dhadrianwale's parchaar:
Dhadrianwale survived but unfortunately another parcharik Singh was killed ... so Dhumma started justifying the attack instead of condemning it as the anti-sikh activity it is bhraa-maar.
This was organised by a group of Fanboys in the Taksal at the constant twisting of words of Dhumma , if this was tried in London Dhumma would be done for conspiracy by inciting criminal acts.
Now we have Ajnala standing up in Hazoori of Guru ji and speaking all sorts of rubbish about Dhadrianwale - about how he soiled himself etc etc. foul language was used .
No response from Dhadrianwale in the negative,but due to sangat pressure came online to apologise:
lately Dhadrianwale did this parchaar:
For which Lately, Ajnala has been taking his gang of saathis to extract an apology from Dhadrianwale by blocking Parmeshvar Dwar , sounds more like mafia tactics than sitting down calmly and doing vichar , finding a solution. Then these two videos came out :
Bhai Ajnala is actually not lying about the whole issue of being soiled but he is not with dhumma, he disagreed clearly with the way they attacked on dhadrianwale.
at the same time, dhadrianwale has the duty to not let manmat be influenced into their parchar. They have been quoting sgpc sources and sources from "Mahinder singh josh" who is anti Dasam granth's charitaropkyan and has destructed great deals of history.
Together, none of the parties are correct, wrong in their own ways and both seem to be the puppets of Badalsss
0 -
1 hour ago, californiasardar1 said:
I don't think it is Sikhi. But if only the people who fully and properly represent Sikhs were to remain as visible (keshadhari, dastar-wearing) Sikhs, our numbers would dwindle to what -- 100? 200?
It is helpful to have people in the fold who may not live the way we like but can still be counted as nominally belonging to our community. Numbers matter.
3HO members have been doing that, haven't they? They are posting videos online and mixing Sikhi up with Hinduism. They are in massive numbers and are just getting more popular- but this means they are using sikhi for their own means. They are not representing Sikhi, or true gursikhs. Alcoholics "Sardars" aren't representing sikhi either, people keep mixing us up. We are greeted with balle balle and burraaaahs because of them, imagine how would that feel when you are going to gurdwara or coming from work, doing some jaap.
quantity, there is 96 Crore khalsa, neither does guru ji nor the panth need these extras misinterpretating sikhi
0 -
Does anyone have a clue?
0 -
WJKK WJKF,
couldn't help but catch up with Jagowale vs Dhadrianwale
and realised many people dislike taksalis, calling them aggressive, illogical, "hot-minded".
Has this become a general trend? Seems people prefer to follow the professors/"khalsa" from colleges, following SGPC's maryada (won't call it Akal Thakat Maryada)
0 -
On 3/26/2017 at 6:50 PM, JUSTAJATT said:
Radhasoamis are the worst because they are the clever deceivers. They fool Sikhs by using gurbani and doing some secret whispering of naam in your earl lobe>>> a load of baloney
I think there are a few members on here as well that pretend to be gursikhs and put on posts about "bhakti". But they foolishly leave some clues in the way they say and describe certain things. Don't worry, you know who you are and so do I
Missionaries are worse. Didn't you hear how they use gurbani by all wrong ways, taking out one pangti from a shabad, not contrasting it with another pangti that says the opposite. And oh, they claim to be "khalsa", much more dangerous
1 -
6 minutes ago, Kira said:
I owe you an apology. I actually thought you were a guy for ages, your name says singhni but I always missed the "ni"
Hahahaha!
0 -
3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:
that's why they've made it a closed shop activity because ordinary Kaurs may rock the boat of their self-delusion of 'leadership' 'expression' and question their attitudes . It is definitely NOT about sisterhood in any sense
Exactly! These few women defining sikhi their way all over again.
0 -
4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:
As I've said before, you bibiya with your heads screwed on straight need to step up and put the record straight. Don't throw Singhs under the bus because you struggle to find your voice. Each time a male speaks up in these kind of instances, he's going to be rounded upon immediately.
They shut us women as well. Telling us that the sikhi is between them and guru ji. So much for a panth-sisterhood.
0 -
1 hour ago, californiasardar1 said:
Why don't you guys just lay off her?
At least she has some sort of interest in Sikhi and wishes to identify as a Sikh. Would you be happier of she cut her kesh, stopped expressing any sort of allegiance to Sikhi, and became another completely nonreligious punjabi girl?
If someone is gravitating towards Sikhi in any way, let's try to encourage that and be inclusive instead of nitpicking and pushing them away.
If you don't like the way that she is doing something, show a different/better example yourself.
Why do people always have to include such feedbacks?
what makes one think that we are perfect? Why can't a person simply comment on the doings of another?
If you this is sikhi-congragulations. She is well promoting it. These women on social media are the reason why people view sikhi so lightly.
Brainwashed much.
0
Hatred towards Taksal/Budha Dal
in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Posted
Respect and love should come mutually from two people. I am surrounded with nihangs and akjs and taksalis, they all respect the differences except when some people just love insulting others. DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY