Jump to content

Ranjeet01

Members
  • Posts

    4,384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    67

Posts posted by Ranjeet01

  1. 9 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

    I recently met up with some old family I hadn't seen since I was a kid. They moved to Canada from the UK about 30 years ago, and they largely say the same stuff. I also think an element of social status / class has crept into these attitudes. Even the relatively recent (2010+) arrivals from Punjab who had a comfortable middle class existence in Punjab (headmasters, teachers, nurses, doctors, etc) definitely don't think too favourably of the gob5hite, pendu Moosewale lovers who've flocked to Canada. In fact, I'm seeing more of that old-school jaat discrimination being transferred to intra-jaat differences in places like Canada where inter-caste albeit equal-social-status marriage is on the rise at the expense of same-caste yet unequal-social-status being rejected. It seems when caste use to denote social standing in the old country, it was used to discriminate. But this has gradually given way in migrant diaspora communities to a form of class discrimination. Fascinating. Man always finds way of building boundaries.

    It is the padhe likheh - non padhe likhe divide. 

    Education has far bigger impact in Punjab in terms of social class. It is what I find triggers a lot of our people. 

    I made a joke to a guy from Hoshiarpur saying that it should be re-name Befkoofpur and he then got offended and starts to mention that it is the most educated tehsil. 

    An observation I have noticed particularly with our diaspora in North America is that if a Punjabi/Sikh migrant becomes pakkah and he gets married, his bride is typically more educated than he is.

    This is anecdotal but I know of friends who live in the US and this guy's wife is more educated than he is. And he has children who are quite intellectual and academic as well and he finds it quite difficult to relate to them. He does his best but I get the feeling that he feels left behind.

     

     

     

  2. I remember in the early 2000's Australia was all the rage and you never heard about Keneda. 

    Then Australia dried up their student visas and Keneda opened up their student visas.

    I think that even though both are Anglo countries, our people in general prefer Keneda over Australia. 

    Though Australia had their fair share of the putteh kam by these "hard working students"

    What happens when all the Anglo countries dry up their student visas, where will these students go?

  3. 18 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

    Unless the Dravidian states of India also split, India isn't likely going to give up just Punjab, (don't expect any other North Indian Hindu state to leave, as they've been influenced by "Hindu Hindi Hindustan").

    If India will unravel, it would probably be through Punjab which is why the Central Government will never give up. 

    If you saw what happened with the Kisan protests, the farmers of Tamil Nadu protested for several years and it fell on deaf ears. It was only until Punjab got involved that you saw real action.

    That is why we Sikhs are a threat ,because we have a knack of galvanising and organising in a way no body else in the subcontinent can. It was only after the Kisan convoy came from Punjab that the other states followed suit. 

    We may think that the Government of India is a threat to our survival but the opposite is also true. The Government of India and all the apparatus sees us Sikhs as threat to their survival.

    I think the only thing that might bring the Hindu Hindu Hindustan is the threat of external aggressor, but you might have the rise of regional parties in India. 

  4. On 8/28/2022 at 3:46 PM, Suchi said:

    You are living in a fool's paradise.  The world is moving towards bigger countries as small countries can't defend themselves. 

    Watch how Pakistan is being dismantled brick by brick due to their economic failures.  A la Sri Lanka, Bangladesh. 

    All because they got into bed with China. 

     

    The world has had bigger countries broken into smaller countries.

    The USSR is now 15 countries, Yugoslavia is now 6-7 countries. Czechoslavakia now 2 countries.  Sudan, Eritrea, East Timor.

    Pakistan and Bangladesh became 2 countries.

    Scotland wants independence and there are numerous other independence movements.

    All those smaller countries in Europe are part of NATO. 

  5. This whole conversation and many of it's facets boils to one conclusion. 

    We need our own political state because ultimately we need power over our own affairs. 

    If we have power, then we can leverage it for our own self interest. 

    The problem we have is that we are good at leveraging power at an micro individual level but not at a macro collective level. 

    I mentioned the word self-interest here but this is a dirty word for our Sikh psyche because our collective mentality is to be selfless and vand the power with non Sikhs. 

    Our problems  (going to sound controversial )are grounded in our skewed Sikh values and principals. 

  6. 15 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

    As someone observed a few weeks ago, they're going to be in trouble when it comes to their daughters and a certain predatory brown minority. They don't see it, though.

    What is the gora expression 

    "We told you so!" Or 

    " You can lead horse to water but you can't make them drink"

    We have done what we can, but they think they are more clever than us.

    Let them learn the hard way.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use