StarStriker

Amandeep bhogal n paul uppal..classic examples of wen condoms shudda beeen used by their dads...absolute behsharams.

On 12/11/2016 at 1:42 PM, dallysingh101 said:

the reaction of certain crews (the second generation here), that stopped them in their tracks. I saw myself tuvay getting axed in the head, chopped up with machetes, beat with bats - it was pakis that did this. This put the fear of God in the tuvay and things improved in a short time.

That maybe the case in e.london, but it isnt necessarily the case in other parts of the uk. Sikhs smashed up kaleh in w.midlands, particularly in handsworth/wolves areas. W.london sikhs r a lot more street smart than e.london ones it would appear by ur comment. Also a lot of hindu sri lankan tamil gangs have been smashin up paks in london for the past decade or so. These r tamils who have seen war back in tamil eelam, so london streets to them aint sh!t. I believe ross kemp did a docu and they were featured in it. From 2000-2010, was probably the weakest sikhs have been 'on the roads', but sikhs r startin to pick up again some sort of martial spirit. Thing with these scumpuri fake kashmiris, is that they have large numbers, which they use to their advantage, n always have done. 

Canadian sikhs have always been the hardest and most feared of all sikh diaspora communities, that cant b disputed. Perhaps uk sikhs can learn a lot more from them.

5 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

I think what Sas is doing is great. They are actually talking to parents in Gurdwaras and letting them know how it. 

Hopefully we now see a reduction in cases that happen. We cant stop them all but aslong as we do our bit.

We need to educate the parents and teens when they are young. Now lets stop yapping on about this. Its a demoralising subject to discuss not to mention disgusting. 

The interesing fact that bhai mohan singh stated in a video, was that in w.london, 90%+ of the cases of sikhs being groomed, are from the afghan sikh community, which kinda shows atleast in london, that panjabi sikhs there are far more clued up on this, so there seems to be a reduction atleast on that side.

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

it was a white researcher who did the whistle blowing to Boris besides the sikh federation seem to be in cahoots with uk and India in my mind , aren't they the ones who had a 'secret' chat with Modi

No that was the dumb sikh council. sikh fed r open khalistanis, theyre hardly gona sip chaa with modi.

On 01/11/2016 at 9:01 PM, Guest N Kaur said:

I was born into Sikhism but I don't believe in reincarnation so this only leaves me with Judaism Christianity or Islam as a an option, 

Right.....so ur tellin us, a story that all humans came from 2 boys havin sex (kane/abel), eve came from adams rib....yes his bloody rib,makes more sense than reincarnation?

Heres part 1

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10153862225112791&id=240716567790&__tn__=*s

Heres part 2

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10153864634602791&id=240716567790&__tn__=*s

11 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Anyone else see the pattern that I can? ? Daal ch Kuch kala lagda. 

Mircha Baut a, par thorka jalgea. 

i dont even know, y i even bothered tbh.

4 minutes ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Thanks for your kind words, I really don't think I'm asking for very much..  Please provide me with a reference to gurbani where it is proscribed.. Can you please provide me with the text you have read so that I can refer to it, study and learn from it.  To progress this conversation could you please supply me with the source reference and any translation you are using. This will help us understand whether in the first instance we can be sure to be talking about the same thing. I am not looking for for 'evidence' as you say but for your assertion to be qualified I would say it is pretty standard practice to provide references. I have the greatest respect for Guru Granth Sahib Ji and would never wish to misinterpret the divine words nor accuse any one else of. I think rather than make judgements about me let's go through the text you are using and let's talk about it. I think we are getting closer you have referred me to first laava can you please illustrate to me how the bani here proscribes interfaith marriage.

Right.....so having told u where it is written, u STILL cant force urself to simply google translations? U really need to b babysat thru this? Ridiculous, u probably cant bring urself to the truth and realisation.

47 minutes ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Please my friend choose just one example and share with me the reference in Gurbani. You have suggested that their are many many to choose from I am just looking for one example you would be doing me a great service and I would be forever grateful.

Humbly

Sukh

 

Go and read 1st paragraph of lavan (anand karaj) it says to make the guru the centre of ur life and meditate on gurus name and worship the guru only. How can u do this, if u r a christian, whos guru is jesus, muslim whos guru is mohammed, a hindu (who have no guru) and take lavan? By bowing down and circulating around guru, u r agreeing to a contract with guru ramdas ji. U cannot break that contract 2 hrs later wen u go n marry in a church.

Rather than asking for proof like a kid, u just like other atheistic communist 2minute sikhs havnt even bothered reading the actual prayers which r involved in the anand karaj itself.

Watch this.

I sense multiple id's....pathetic!

1 hour ago, pavitarsk said:

I don't think he has been endorsed by Shromani Committee or any of those so called taksals. He is a self proclaimed parsharack. I wonder how many take him seriously, not sure.

"Self-proclaimed parcharak"......right and wat? Who's permission does he need u fool? Lol how many take him seriously? Oh i dont kno......maybe 46,000+ who have subscribed to his channel, and all those lapsed sikhs/muslims/atheist/hindus who have become sikhs and taken amrit from around the world. Typical of our "own-ppl", who love luthh-kicching others who r actually doing something. If u dont like it, open ur own sikhi channel/org/charity n do something, otherwise zip it.

35-40m sikhs, not the rubbish 20m we r always told by indian govts deliberatly lowered census count.

6 minutes ago, canadianguest5 said:

What do you mean it's the other way around in south of uk? Muslim girls date Sikh guys?

Yea

No alot DONT date them, but ALOT are groomed (underaged), by pak paedophiles, helped by police cover up. Down in south of uk, its the other way around. Up north cud b a different thing.

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

honestly if it doesn't bother you why are you so gusa?

wat i wanna know is, where did the 5 "likes" of his post come from all of a sudden? Ive noticed this quite frequently this week alone...is their multiple ID's here or sumink?

59 minutes ago, pardesanbibbi2 said:

Thanks for being honest and unbiased.  Well done!

Dont believe in his nonsense madam, the 6th sikh guru, hargobind sahib ji and the following gurus made sikhs into martial community, we didnt need any foreigners to tell us. He seems anti sikh with his wording and a complete prat. Also the sikh dharam is very tolerant, otherwise many ex-muslims/ex hindus wud never have become sikhs in large numbers in the 1st place. Panjabi culture is the problem. In the future wen most of the 960m sikhs, will be non asian (probably white/black), then we will see sikh community with less corruption.

Im not sure quite wat this thread has descended into. 

Anyways, heres an interesting article about fraud theresa. 

Shes no francis of assisi, who was a genuine chardi kalah man.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=6811

are some ppl on here allergic to reading the posts put up above about the REAL "mother" teresa? Ehmi bandhara vangu sifta karri jandeh ya!

" a wonderful phenomena which has no equal "..........err no i think u will find that was guru tegh bahadur ji, who gave his head for another faith, without wanting anyfink in return, thats true benevolent selfless seva/service!

I remember reading somewhere a while back that sindhi hindus were gonna be converted en masse to sikhi around 1946-47 time via amrit sanchars from panjab, just like how other hindus had in w.panjab. But then unfortunatly partition happened, and alot of sindhi hindus who chose to go india, went to mumbai/gujarat, n assimilated consequently back into being hindus again. The remaining sindhi hindus in pakistan tho, carried on being sehajdhari sikhs, but coz nobody frm sgpc afta partition bothered to send parcharaks/hold amrit sanchars, they kind of cooled off sikhi, into a more respect thing, rather than living like sikhs. I do remember reading a interview of a pak sindhi sikh (ex hindu) who did say how of the remaining 2million hindus in pak, majority r willing to take amrit with bit of parchar n an amrit sanchar if held. The sgpc has a lot of questions to answer. Wat do they even do with all that money? Jagraj singh (BoS), made a great point, of how, not 1 single tamil, gujarati, bangali, hindi etc parcharaks have been invested in by sikh authorities.

3 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Why was Punjab so easily conquered before Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji? Indo-Aryans, Greeks, Persians, Afghans, and Mughals, now the British and Indians, as well as Pakistan owned Punjab, all seemed to have their ownership of Punjab.

Its not a coincidence that when the tribes of panjab become sikhs, that the indigenous population of panjab finally put a stop to outside invaders. What makes me laugh is how panjabi muslims have been the majority community in panjab for many centuries now (600+yrs), yet they havnt once been rulers of panjab, and were subservient to mughals/afghans, who all treated em like sh!t, yet it was under kuffar sikh kingdoms were they left alone.

1 hour ago, Jonny101 said:

Define India? If by India you mean the artificial state that the British created in 1947, then no. But if by India you mean a continent of independent nations and regions as it always has been historically then yes I agree with you much like Europe is a continent with many independent nations and regions. One just needs to read Mahabharat and see what was the geography of India back then. It was never an artificial one nation centralized state as it is now. Bharat was full of independent kingdoms. Back then Punjab was called Madhardesh

great post! Btw, who gave panjab the name panjab? Was it genghis khan? Coz i know that it was formerly called the sapt sindhu (land of 7 rivers), which is panjab + sindh

On 27/02/2013 at 0:29 AM, Gurpreet14 said:

Jonny101 g... the above link is almost contradictory to what Puneet Lamba has mentioned.... :wow: :wow:

Means after reading both the articles - One will be confused about the facts - whatz ryt n whatz wrong....

By d way.. thanks for presenting both the aspects.....

But can u let me knw 1 thing.... what was this Anandpur sahib resolution initiated by Sant ji and i was told by my elders that Sant ji was a person who made a demand for khalistan n he with all his weapons tried to hide himself in Golden temple.... but things here are different.. can u please let me know.. what was d motive of Sant ji ? :respect:

research sk sinha, he reveals how op bluestar was pre-planned in 1982, yet sant ji and other sikhs, were NOT inside the complex in 82, so who were they after? It was an attack on the panth and to break the backbone of the sikhs.

watch the rest of the 5 sant ji related videos on rajoana tv's site.

https://www.youtube.com/user/RajoanaTV/videos

Death to both countries

Haaaaa, look at this clown scummy hundals comment to a guy on FB. U just couldnt make it up....."its for her family"...mate the irony in this is just astonishing, after all the crap hes been writing. His entire career (failed journo career) is based upon cussing sikhs, this comment just sums him up.