MisterrSingh

1 hour ago, proudkaur21 said:

I'm always surprised by how invested men are in football while so much is going on in the world. Like no worries about anything just obsessed with their favourite player or club and what not and then constantly talking about it online. 

They drain you of your passion, your vital energy, elements of your soul that drives the need for competitiveness, etc. These are vital aspects of us that we should be channelling into making ourselves better people. Things that you should transfer into your family and your home are wasted on the narratives of multi-millionaire sports-people, celebrities, and billion-dollar corporations. It's actually obscene when you've stepped away from that scene for a while.

1 minute ago, kangw said:

How many times are you going to hit the nail on the head?  

I get lucky sometimes.

On 4/17/2022 at 11:29 PM, Jacfsing2 said:

i'm trying to quit video games

Try harder. It's a waste of time and emotional effort. Learn a practical skill that you normally pay another person to do (home repair / maintenance, etc) or a martial art to aid fitness. Or just read something.

I was a little more than an average gamer but not quite hardcore. I was in my late 20s, mindlessly bashing buttons one day. Opposite from where I was sitting was a mirror. I saw myself, a grown man, playing a video game, and it hit me like a ton of bricks; a tide of overwhelming shame washed over me. "You soft b*****d" I said to myself. Next day I sold my consoles and all my games. One of the best things I ever did.

I feel the same about spectator sports such as football. I was heavily into football. I was a proper statistician. I could've told you the teams and squads up to the reserve team of every club in the domestic European leagues. That's hundreds of players! Knocked that 5hit on the head in my early 20s, too.

Bread and circuses bukwaas. They get you to invest your heart and soul into this 5hit so that you ignore or neglect the actual important stuff you need to be aware of. Moderation isn't the issue at all. It's all corporate cr4p that chips away at your aatma.

49 minutes ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

1. I don't know what planet you are living on MisterrSingh or which part of London you are living as I have never had any problems with the Afro-Caribbean who are in the main superb people particularly the older generation (though i do not deny that a minority of youth influenced by anti-Black Drill music are bad eggs). But I strongly feel that you might be projecting your own limited experiences as if they are reflective of the UK Sikh community. I strongly believe that only a minority of Sikhs may have experienced racism from black or mixed race folks in this decade. 

2. Africans represent the majority of the Black community in the UK and therefore from your own words and experience with them you acknowledge that most "black" folks are good decent people just like Sikhs.

Your experiences aren't indicative of the mainstream. Neither are mine but I'm not emotionally invested in proving myself correct whereas you seem to be taking this very personally, which suggests your assertions are difficult to take at face value.

When Canadian, American, and UK Sikhs are telling you there's a problem in black attitudes towards Sikhs in those THREE countries, your attempts at subversion are simply not working. There's nothing more to be said.

1 hour ago, Deepthinking22 said:

I'm seeing this happen more and more with Indians sadly.  I've lost count of the amount of Indian women in London who have said they will exclusively only date white guys.  The main reason for this is propaganda by western media and entertainment etc.  Our story bares some similarities to East Asians in the USA.  We are being emasculated and being systematically segregated and erased from Media mainly sport and entertainment.  An article came out not long ago showing the racism faced by Asians in the UK TV and Film industry (I work in Film and TV btw, not as an actor of course lol).  An Asian actor described how he met an agent who said we will only ever cast Indians for geek roles.  He then had an interview for a role with another agent who told him he is far too good looking for the role!  They basically want to show us as shy, awkward, geeky ugly guys.  Don't even get me started on football which I will probably start a whole new thread on one day.  A black manager in football without hesitation said Asians have it far worse than blacks in football. Also, notice how the main High Street fashion brands never use Indian models. It's always black, white, mixed and now even East Asian but not Indians.  Absolute joke.  Look at JD sports for example. This was going on for decades.  Now you may have a breakaway model because of BLM and diversity etc, but I'm yet to see one for JD for example.  It's segregation, no other way to put it. 

You know the argument / criteria the Leftist cultural and media establishment use to placate Indians from this obvious barring from certain visible "sectors" and industries?

Indian academic and economic achievement is used to argue that we don't need representation in these "soft power" cultural industries; that blacks and Muslims need this representation because they're the most oppressed and underachieving. F**k off with that nonsense, lmao.

It's damaging for us, because our youngsters see blacks and others represented in all the "cool" stuff, and naturally they wonder why their own aren't there. As you said, girls / young women are even more impressionable from a biological evolution perspective, and when they see blacks and others in leading and heroic roles, they're going to be swayed by that. There's no two ways about it.

These "soft power" industries of TV, film, music, and sport are ALL in the hands of white Leftists and ideological white Marxists and their loyal minority lackeys. These aren't upper-class toffs pulling the strings. It's late-Boomers and early Millennials who are incharge, and they're making it policy to exclude groups such as ours. 

6 hours ago, jay singh said:

Vjkkvjkf

I have heard some kathavachaks use Kavi jis writings for Katha. 
I believed the writings to be genuine, but yesterday I happened to have a conversation at the gurdwara & this guy said Suraj parkash mentions Guru Gobind singh asking for feem? 
 

Which doesn’t sit well, can someone help?

It's a can of worms for sure.

Feem for medicinal purposes is understandable considering there wasn't a Boots chemist or an A&E nearby. 

Some cheeky bugger5 would say it was for recreational purposes. 

Others would say an avatar doesn't require medicine or similar things, therefore these claims are false.

Who knows.

28 minutes ago, Jassu said:

By the way you PMed me to delete all my posts because "blacks will see and be offended and then not be inclined to join Sikhi". Lol, first of all, Gurjant and MANY posters here have posted anti-white rhetoric for numerous years now. If you look at the stats of this website, it is likely that more white people are visiting than black people. Also, in general, more white people would be inclined to join Sikhi than black people who are more inclined to join Islam. These are facts, actually. Whites are more receptive towards Sikhi while blacks are more receptive towards Islam. Ya'll also alienate the number one demographic of Sikhs, Jatt Sikhs. Imagine if any good Jatt individual came across all your nasty posts. They would feel bad. SO No I will delete my posts, how about you tell others to delete all their anti-Jatt, anti-white nonsense first.

Doesn't take a genius to figure there's a concerted effort on this forum to equate "Jattism" within Sikhi with the equivalent "Whiteness" in the Anglosphere; therefore two groups who are solely responsible for the evils of their respective demographics, and therefore two groups to be eliminated according to this beautifully tolerant and welcoming philosophy. 

I've been radicalised by this forum in ways you wouldn't believe!

The facts are the following pertaining to these particular incidents:

1. Sikh elders have been attacked by black criminals.

2. We, as a community, have a right to describe the racial and ethnic background of the attackers. We'd do it if was Muslims, Mexicans, Whites, whatever.

Everything else is f****g fantasy, American-Marxist bull5hit. 

For "Sikh" organisations to GASLIGHT Sikhs in an insidious attempt at extreme political correctness that places us under threat of further harm is f****g EVIL. 

Anyone who tries to "Marxplain" and "Whatabout" their way out of confronting the reality of this problem is not a friend of Sikhs.

5 hours ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

2. Exactly some junkie crackheads with mental illness might assume that Sikhs are Muslim terrorists but our people should NOT be presenting that as bogus evidence of supposed racism on the basis of the melanin content of the attackers by a 40million strong community who merit our maximum support as our natural allies and victims of hundreds of years of Slavery and Racism.

So while they're working through their issues, shall we just bend over and take it? How many Sikhs are you willing to sacrifice in this self-effacing show of support for a group that doesn't:

A. Give a 5hit about whatever or whoever we happen to be?

B. Are going to default to turning to Abrahamic factions for "allyship" in a potential recovery process rather than a bunch of bearded, "Pagan" Indians?

Even the black people I know would say you're making excuses for people who don't deserve it. But that happens when you see every black criminal as a junkie. Maybe they're just racist b******s looking for an easy target like some white criminals? What's with the Marxist reframing of every god-damn thought and action in terms of Oppressor Vs Victim? When did this 5hit infiltrate this forum?

38 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

Yep I did go down the avenue of learning about Islam Not because I was interested in it. But like many Sikhs or non Muslims I had no real knowledge of the religion. So one day I had a lightbulb moment. I thought let's learn a little about it (reluctantly) and see the main beliefs, main contradictions aswell as criticisms . First I studied Muhammed solely. To see what he was about. It didn't take long for me to come to my conclusions about him as there is so much criticism of him due to his immoral actions that I didn't even have to go any further really. But I still researched more as it was astonishing to find so much info that shows its a religion that does not make any sense or logic. 

Now I feel so much better and instead of disliking something I did not really know to much about. Now I dislike it even more knowing about all the inaccuricies and mistakes there is in the Koran which I have learnt about. It's given me a whole knew perspective and made me more firm in my own Sikh faith. 

A book I recommend to read is 

'The truth about Muhammed'

It's one of the most popular books that explains in a concise and easy to understand way. Why Islam is not the truth. Iv not read it yet. But Ive heard good reviews about it. 

There's some amazing scholarship going on in America at the moment which is dismantling Islam's fraudulence. Granted, it's Christian missionaries who are taking the fight to them, but there's a few that are uncovering information that just can't be disputed. Cleverly, they aren't framing it as these Christian scholars and professors "destroying" Islam and rendering Muslims with no place to go in a spiritual perspective. They're actually presenting their case in similar terms to the "Ghar Vaapsi" program of the Hindutva, i.e. giving any Muslim who renounces the religion the opportunity to "come home" to Christianity and Jesus. From a purely sociological perspective, ripping away the "support" of their Islamic religion that we all know is fed into Muslim minds from the cradle, is too much for the average Muslim who'd probably lose his mind when he realises everything he's been brainwashed into believing is a lie. So, these Christians dismantle Islam but then provide the apparatus of Christianity as an immediate support. As I said, it's a very smart way to wean Muslims off Islam instead of the gung-ho, "your religion is a Satanic blasphemy" route.

There's no way that's 2XL, the lying fat frigger. That's at least 4XL. 

It's not surprising that Western-based "Sikh" institutions have realised that the Progressive Stack of Minorities & Causes must prioritise non-Sikh demographics at the expense of the people they're supposed to be advocating for.

Imagine Jews being attacked on the streets in New York, and in response the ADL or other Jewish advocacy organisations decide to browbeat Jews into not highlighting the racial or religious background of the perpetrators. Vah, that's wonderfully tolerant and progressive.

They throw their own under the bus because their bogus western social ideology has convinced them the "fashionable" pet minority demographic is under "threat", while all along it's this same fashionable pet demographic that's going around smashing up the elders from their community!

And yet, deep down, these "Sikhs" don't even have the courage to resent the actual demographic who did the crime, because they unashamedly wish it was white supremacists who were committing these acts against their people so they can grandstand on their soapboxes, and probably get more funding from the government! F**k me, I'm exhausted just writing about these mental gymnastics. How do the people who partake in it get through the day?