Jump to content

SikhiInspire

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by SikhiInspire

  1. Sat Sri Akal Ji, Bhai Sahb Ji, I didn't watch it because I don't want to contribute money to a movie which thanks Shiv Sena before anything else. Their hands are red with shaheedi of a singh, which I atleast haven't forgotten. This is a start. First they butter you, then they butcher you. This has been strategy since old times and I feel anyone with a little understanding of "Chanakya neeti" would understand it. By it I mean to say that using conditional psychology they will go on and on and within a few years we would have a movie in which some actor plays full fledged role of Guru Maharaj. The day is not far, this forum would be here, you can revisit it to quote me. If they would not have shown it that way, sikhs would have been collectively agitated of misappropriation of facts. So they just created a ground work for future manipulations. (They=anti-sikh elements) It is not a paranoia. Do you know everything that happens behind closed doors of indian government? Can you say for certainty that RSS is pro-sikh? If they would not have been there wouldn't have been official statements from stages of Nagpur (RSS headquarters) by RSS chiefs over the years that "Sikhs are hindus". If you still don't feel how big conspiracy is going on against sikhi by reading these statements, I can't say anything more. We shouldn't close our eyes and say sab theek hai, when the trouble maker is there, rat&cat analogy. Rather open the senses and see whats happening around. Indeed it may be splendid, superb, marvellous, but as I said earlier, any movie where anti-sikh elements are involved creates big doubts behind the intentions. Which youth, who is a drug addict, would go in cinema halls and see this movie? Jehra pehlan hi bemukh hai oh eh specially jaake dekhu? I don't think so. Naale je movies hi nasha hataun lag gayian taan its so easy, movies banao, lokan nu dikhao and bas problem solve. Problem edan nu solve hundi veerji. Gyan andron aunda, jo Gurbani leke aundi. Gurbani samjhan di lorh hai drug problem solve hoju. One day someone would say Gurbani is stone-age thinking too, "Bahut old cheez aa ji, time de naal badalna penda". But I am sorry, jo cheez change ho gayi, that can't be true. Sach is something which is eternally true. We are loosing our youth because of our so called panthic leaders. Who do you think allows drugs to be sold so freely? Its the government, which indirectly controls Sikhi too. If sikhi is liberated from them today (as I said in earlier post), its obvious more youth would come into sikhi. The same happened in 1970s and 1980s when we were free from government influence. Aside, veerji do you think its right for some person to play role of Guru Sahib? Guru Sahib varga kon ho sakda. We don't know what that actor does in this real life (not reel life). And he/she plays role of these pious souls? It doesn't seem nice. Rest you know better than me. I don't mean any offence from my post. Bhul chuk maaf Waheguru Ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
  2. I think the underlying problem is that we tend to equate Sikhi with other religions. Sikhi is sampooran sach, for which Guru Nanak Dev Ji founded a revolutionary way of thought- Sikhi. Bhagat Namdev ji explains it as follows on Ang 874: Hindhoo Annhaa Thurakoo Kaanaa || The Hindu is sightless; the Muslim has only one eye. Dhuhaan Thae Giaanee Siaanaa || The enlightened one is wiser than both of them. Hindhoo Poojai Dhaehuraa Musalamaan Maseeth || The Hindu worships at the temple, the Muslim at the mosque. Naamae Soee Saeviaa Jeh Dhaehuraa N Maseeth ||4||3||7|| Naam Dev serves that Akal Purakh, who is not limited to either the temple or the mosque. ||4||3||7|| You can easily mock some partial truth, but sampooran (complete) truth Sikhi, should be respected. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
  3. Sat Sri Akal ji, I haven't seen the movie myself. The analysis here is based information obtained from a few acquaintances who saw the movie in Haryana. The first visual in the movie after the initial production slides, is a note of thanks to the Indian PM Modi and Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray. It clearly shows they were in loop in making of this movie. Shiv sena (along with like-minded anti-sikh RSS) is purely against sikhi, and became the reason of shaheedi of a sikh youth in gurdaspur a few years ago. Do I need to say anything more? Would you support a movie backed by someone responsible for shaheedi of our innocent sikh brother? And see how selfless Sikka is portaying himself today after taking back the movie. What was the purpose of releasing it if he had to take it back after 3 days of release. "Oh, I respect the Akal Takhat Sahib". Where was respect a few days ago? This can only be possible if he has some cruel motives/anti-sikh political backing behind him. So the chain of command was: RSS want something to put sikhi down, plans a movie with someone in garb of sikhi-> orders BJP-> orders so called "Panth Ratan" Badal->asks so called "Jathedar" to keep mum-> Hence movie out. Note: I am not against/aligned to any party, for they change after 5 years. I am with the Akal Purakh who is forever in Raj. Synopsis: Whatever thing in which RSS is involved should be gauged with extra caution. RSS is involved in this movie (indirectly), so be vigilant. It is a start of their plan, god knows what else they have in store. Bhul chuk maaf krni, Waheguru Ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use