Sukhvirk1976
-
Posts
878 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by Sukhvirk1976
-
Bul chuk maaf
-
Were all fallible my friend.. That's the point
-
LOL now please just let me remind you of your last few posts.. You first threw into the mix bhai gurdas ji //, then randomly referred to Bilija ji then refer to a document by bhai vir Singh from the 19th century only to go back in time to bhai mani and to boot also throw in for credibility meharban sakhis.. Finally you some how say you're definition is laid out by guru sahib.. So let's cut to the chase.. Where does SGGS ji lay it out as you would have me believe?
-
Guru maneyo Granth
-
A tribe called quest
-
I didn't say he wasn't a Sikh! I just don't believe in your narrow definition of the term
-
Please show me where I should look in the source you have provided..
-
So you have a source that apparently agrees with you... What about sources that show no evidence of it at all
-
I could go on and on and systematically undermine it.. Your whole assumption is is based on the idea that to be recognized as a Sikh bhagats would have needed to firstly have met Guru sahib and secondly taken Charan Pahul ie. Amrit... If sikhi and guru nanak dev ji teaches us we should move beyond such labels why would he compel people to do that!?
-
Your entire proposition is flawed and yet you still rage
-
It's not the same person lol
-
You haven't provided any evidence.. Please show me the details that I can read
-
And BTW you didn't quote
-
You have no idea
-
Wrong.. Baba farid ji who's bani is in SGGS ji was the predecessor to the head of the silsila of Guru Nanak Dev Ji times
-
OK so let's just follow your train of thought,... Baba farid who lived 300 years before guru nanak dev ji and the tradition of Charan Pahul took amrit from guru sahib because guru sahib gave him amrit..?
-
Bhai gurdas ji doesn't say that please show me where he explicitly does
-
You clearly don't read what I am saying.. Of course Baba Buddha ji was a Sikh
-
It's really simple please provide a example from bani to support your assertions otherwise it's just interpretation
-
Don't kop out if you have the source share it.. Moreover Sant maskeen was far more discerning than to make such claims
-
Paji that quote is from bhai gurdas //, which I fully respect however it does not explicitly state Baba Buddha ji took Charan Pahul
-
No I don't think it takes any acrobatics other than ask for a source of your assertion
-
I'm ignorant as gursikhs please educate me
-
So how could Baba farid have taken Charan Pahul?
-
I apologize please can you supply evidence