ChardikalaUK

The horny devil did other sick stuff as well. He slaughtered all the men (including teenage boys) from a Jewish tribe he had just defeated, he then slept with the tribe leader's daughter on the same night he murdered her father and husband. He also got his adopted son to divorce his wife so that he could sleep with her. 

A depraved lustful man.

Even necrophilia is permitted in Islam

https://www.meforum.org/57825/islamic-necrophielia

A devilish cult. 

The suls get shocked when you question them on this.

2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

I strongly believe that a lot of apnay seriously struggle to differentiate between genuine concern about long standing inequalities in our panth through our own brand of casteism, and other generally obnoxious behaviour, and reflective criticism of it, and those who self-hate. We do have a load of common practices that stem from our (Panjabi) culture that are inimical to our other culture/dharam - Sikhi.  The latter always trumps the former. Some of the people who try and highlight and confront this, are doing so because they want to see improvements in our own society.  

Sikhi is always going to be more prudent and humane than Panjabi culture, and that's not to say Sikhi is weak, because we should all know in essence it is also one of the most militant spiritual ethos to ever emerge. 

Ultimately, the fact is that way more people align to Panjabi culture, than a Sikh worldview, they need to admit to this, and not hide this truth.  The truth is that a lot of apnay struggle to shake off corrupt and/or oppressive mentalities amongst our own that we castigate hindus for.  

 

Well said, I want to see improvements in our community. We'll never get anywhere by playing the victim card all of the time. Do we want to be like Shashi Tharoor who blames all of India's problems on the British despite India being free for 75 years now?

Yes the invasions were bad but if we had been more united and better prepared they would not have succeeded. That goes for when we were Hindus and when we were Sikhs.

About Southall, sorry but I get very frustrated there. Like I said people don't follow the rules/law.  I remember shopping for my wedding 5 years ago, literally every single shop let me down with delays and not doing things properly. It was a serious lack of professionalism. In India they call this a 'chalta hai' attitude, it pervades the entire country and explains the chaos. Everyone out for themselves and not thinking about the bigger picture, what implications their actions are having on wider society.

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

What's strange is that I've met a few really black loathing people from the UK who do business in the US (around NY and Miami) and whatever experiences they have had seems to have changed them. Now they say they can't stand black people but African-Americans are okay. lol! 

Might watch that film again btw. Haven't seen it in many years. 

Yeah the vast majority of them were nice and struck up conversations with me. It's a cultural difference, the Anglo whites and Blacks have been in America the longest and both are quite similar in their outgoing nature and having 'American values'.

That film was brutal, I wonder if things are still that bad there. I actually went to Compton while I was in LA, it was OK along their main high street but I felt a bit uneasy in the more residential area. Again, a random friendly black person spoke to me about the nice weather and I got quite a rude response from some Mexicans when I asked for directions.

Even the ghettos in LA have palm trees everywhere lol.

15 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

New Yorkers generally are quite a rude bunch. And that is New Yorkers of all ethnic groups.

Californians I find a lot more relaxed and laid back (generalisation here) compared to New Yorkers.

But your experience could because you were in the big cities. In the smaller cities and towns people tend to be friendlier. 

I myself had a bad experience at JFK airport, one with an African American and one with an Italian American.

I actually found the people in New York to be more friendly than LA, it's a more cosmopolitan place and they are more aware of Sikhs/Indians. There were simply too many superficial wannabes in LA. I think most of the young people there are trying to get into the entertainment industry and either think they are hot sh1t or are p1ssed off that it hasn't happened they have to be waiters. Great weather and scenery though.

I think Italian Americans are also known for being rude/racist, especially based on movies like Goodfellas and shows like the Sopranos. I found Italians in Rome to be rude as well.

I would say people here in Britain are some of the most friendliest in the world.

15 hours ago, proudkaur21 said:

@Kau89r8

Why do they do so much jaloos?

We are an oppressed minority in Kashmir. It's like blacks in the American Deep South laying out drinks for a Ku Klux Klan rally.

On 4/21/2022 at 10:55 PM, SinghPunjabSingh said:

Ok if you want to restrict the breakdown to that, then Sikh fatalities on a per capita basis exceeded Punjabi Muslims by SIX times! 

Sikhs suffered SIX times as many losses in per capita terms compared to Punjabi Muslims and THIRTY times as many losses compared to Muslims in the sub-continent.

What's ridiculous is that despite the existential threat faced by Sikhs - complete Genocide at the hands of Muslims if the 14% minority Sikh population had not resisted east Punjab being annexed by Pakistan in 1947 Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs in the same way that Mirpur District and Gilgit-Baltistan were annexed by Pakistan. Sikhs are always wrongly blamed as the main "bad guys" by these pathetic racist British Empire and racist Muslim academics despite our community being annihilated the most!

Yaar we killed a lot more of them compared to how many they killed of us. I find this miraculous considering how outnumbered we were. It's not good to always play the victim. They started it in Rawalpindi but we gave them hell in return.

If you want to talk about this per capita thing you can say that an average Sikh killed an insanely disproportionately high number of suls.

It was a brutal time and I wish it never happened but it just showed the b@lls and fighting spirit apne had at the time. Pre-bhangra materialistic culture.

1 hour ago, justasking said:

thse blacks are becoming a pain, turst me even in  toronto they attacked a baba but next day they got it bad and these jamaican yardies were teasing woman and punjabis beat them bad there r videos online of these and 10 punjabis jumping 1 kala in brampton, these kaley need it like tht again.

and the media representation who cares we dont even need to mix with these ppl or there media make bank of them they r lowest of the low white western culture is scum fake i see right throught it. as for whites attacking us in my highschool days it was different we would go around and sometimes slap up  random goreh for fun  i know its wrong now but this is wat happened back in the day wen big group of apney would chill around  even kaley sometimes would get chased around but there rnt many kaley here as there r in toronto 

So why are you living in a country that whites founded and laid the foundations of?

40 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's a little more Machiavellian than that. Liberals, right-wingers, and the rest of these labels are a smokescreen. If I start expanding upon the henhouse analogy I might as well start throwing out actual names, lmao. But that last sentence in bold is absolute truth. That's what concerns me. I have no time for Hollywoodised hero fantasies about someone riding in to save the day. When that time comes it'll be brutal.

If Corona has taught us anything, when the government and its various institutions want to put the squeeze on the people, the police don't think twice about following orders, and the media plays its usual psychological gaslighting tricks on the public. Unfortunately, most people fall into line. Imagine a future Anglo UK establishment populated by Pakistanis, Somalians, Banglas, Turks, protected by an Islamophobhia legislation, because with their numbers and representation by the time things get bad for the rest of us, they aren't going to be content with owning supermarkets, auto garages, and the rest. They'll want the real reigns of power, and nothing will stop them from getting it.

The goreh will never let that happen. Do you think they will let suls have such power?

21 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It was an abnegation of responsibility and duty. They could've created a heaven on earth. Instead they sold out humanity for what? Material things. Wealth and sex. F****rs.

Money and power corrupts, even Ranjit Singh liked 54agging around and drinking.

32 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I've come to realise not doing this was a big, big mistake. When they inevitably get to a certain population point in India, will they agitate for another partition? Is there going to be a partition of India every 150 years because these people can't stop breeding and causing trouble? That has to be their plan. Partition India into smaller Islamic states, lol.

You can blame Gandhi and Nehru for that. Say what you will about Tara Singh, his aggression and provocative statements during partition saved us from having a sul problem. Sadly the suls from UP and Bihar are now migrating to Punjab and I blame the Hindus from those regions for not doing their jobs.

But the suls won't get any more partitions, it's pretty much impossible. The British gave them Pakistan and Bangladesh, India won't give them anything. They can't do anything without an army. It's only a matter of time before a 2 child policy is introduced in India. All communities are pretty much at this level apart from suls.

I wouldn't be surprised if America is behind this. When the war in Ukraine started Imran Khan was in Moscow kissing Putin's hand. This has obviously upset them very much.

Perhaps America has a lot of say over the Pak army.

1 hour ago, abhinav said:

I knew a Pakistani kid at school who was seemingly moderate and westernised. We’d have some craic but sometimes he would froth at the mouth about Islam, saying that is the greatest and fastest growing religion and that they were going to take over the UK. I stress that this is an alcohol drinking liberal one. Obviously he would never say this to any gora. The purpose of Islam is to dominate non-Muslims - that’s their opium. They pray en masse in the streets in France and in parks in the UK to gain a sense of control over public spaces and to intimidate kafirs. The high birthrate is another expression of the dominance urge. Non-Muslim women are preyed upon to degrade other communities. Look at how insular and inhospitable Pakistan is, you can see what the religion is really like. Same with the gulf Arab countries like Saudi. I have noticed that their percentage is growing in India. There should have been population transfer at partition.

I'm not surprised. They are brain washed heavily from birth, their moderates are like extremists from other religions. And their extremists are on a other level entirely.

In India we did our part by eliminating them from Punjab. The Hindus messed up big time by letting so many to stay behind.

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

I have a fairly accurate idea but nothing I'd discuss here in detail. Basically, it's like unleashing a wolf in a hen house to wreak havoc and destroy the hens, and then after a while a tiger is unleashed into the same henhouse to kill the wolf. That's about the past 60 years and the next 30 years in summary. 

That sounds about right, the goreh ruled half the world,  they have the best technology in the world, they aren't going to let dumb suls take over. Who would the hens be? Liberals? Left wingers?

They are using the suls to introduce freedom reducing laws. Each time a sul carries out a terror attack a new law is passed.

Sadly we will be caught up in this when the Tiger is unleashed.

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

The infuriating thing about this statistic in our current clown world is that Muslims won't be instructed to stop bearing children beyond their means which is what would happen in a sane, rational country. Instead, the political and cultural establishment will be terrified of suggesting such a thing, and reframe Islamic poverty as a symptom of a discriminatory society, and the problem can only be rectified by awarding them more resources and power. The damaged children in these home environments will then either be encouraged or automatically gravitate towards their evil religious ideology to make sense of their surroundings. These f4ckers create the environment for jihad, and then feed their own people into the meat grinder to perpetuate the same circumstances for more jihad! How long can this continue?

The only thing I can think of why their overbreeding is allowed is for vote banks or so to create fear in the native Brits.

No sane government would let them in.

3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

When we look at the reduced muslim birth rate after education, we are looking at 6 children to 3 or 4 children.

When our parents had siblings, they were big families with 5-6 brothers and sisters. But they decided to have 2-3 children and that is without being educated. 

The next generation after that with education have 1-2 children. 

What does this tell you?

Muslim religion is more collectivist in that group think is more important. The educated Muslim female will do what is for the greater good of their deen and their ummah.

Us Sikhs are more individualist than Muslims, our educated Sikh women will not do the same for our quam.

The problem is that their overbreeding leads to poverty. I read last week that 18% of Britain lives in poverty but amongst suls it is 50%. They are retarded with their mindset. It will only bring them more hardships.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/half-of-uk-muslims-will-struggle-to-provide-enough-food-to-break-fast-during-ramadan-charity-says-12580111