justasking

1 minute ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I didn't undertsand the video fully. Whoever made it absolutely sucks at editing, presenting information, pretty much everything. I mean sinister undertones are obvious, but that's a really weak effort. 

I mean is the ai cheap that made it or the person just retarded?

 

 

basicaly listing common hindu names then they show canadian shaheed Singhs followed by a list of hindus who perished in flight 182 basically putting salt on the  wounds of said hindus  

might be bad taste but hindus r doing same thing

11 hours ago, TigerForce1 said:

Cowardice has many shapes and forms when it come down to the topic of ‘Khalistan’.  

Some say the whole world should be Khalistan not just Punjab.

Some say Khalistan should be made in Pakistan Punjab before Indian Punjab.

Some say everyone must become Khalsa before we talk about Khalistan.

Some say Khalistan should only be the demand of people within Punjab.

Some say Referendum will not achieve Khalistan.

Some choose to ignore the subject and stay silent like the majority on this forum.

All are mostly signs of cowardice!  Your wasting your time about this subject on this forum, as the majority of posters here are people who are disconnected from the real world. 

 

 

Khalistan will include indian states of Punjab, Himachal pradesh, Haryana after this is achieved focus should be on caputring lahore, and expanding into kashmir, 

1 minute ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Grewals and other Jatt clans were ex-rajputs who become Jatts.

Yea im in canada and i have seen marriage with Grewal and Minhas and Sandhu and Parihar

6 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

so basically aroras are a type of khatri 

sorry but im getting curious bout my own lineage here, chohan/chauhans are rajputs or jatts? 

and is there a difference between sodh and sodhi, I heard katha of vadde mahapurkh on sri guru ram dass ji maharaj prakash utsav and they referred to their lineage as sodh vansh instead of sodhi 

Chohan are Rajput, but some Punjabi rajputs have become assimilated into Jatts  like Virk, and call themselves Jatt well others remain calling themselves Rajputs. In Doaba the status and the lifestyle is the same with minor cultural differences.

Ultimatley it depends on your family if they consider themselves Jatt or Rajput

6 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

I thought aroras were literally khatri? 

aroras are a sub branch of khatri i thnk like kamboj is subranch of Jatts

13 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

are rajputs considered to be khatris? 

8 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

They are part of the same varna, but usually it's Rajputs > Khatris > Arora.

I dont think Punajbi rajputs r relate to khatris I know some janjuas and parmars and they look closer to Jatts than khatris and they also r mostly rural community my family comes from hoshairpur and we have a rajput pind pretty close to us 

16 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I think for a group that’s open to marrying their cousin so that they don’t have to marry outsiders, the idea of marrying a Jew is crazy. 

maybe they r crypto jews

2 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

yes thats true and they are very assimilationist types too. I dont consider myself khatri lol. You are right about intermarriages. I think most sikhs who intermarry with hindus are khatris only. When i used to read about kharkus and the khalistan movement i was always surprised by the shraddha they had for sikhi and i never saw that type of spirit in the city sikhs. I guess its because most city sikhs are non jatts. Most of the shaheeds were jatts too i think.

Just now, proudkaur21 said:

its better there are less khatri sikhs. khatris are very weak in sikhi and i think if majority of sikhs were khatri we would all be assimilated in india by today. Although we find faults with jatts, they have always been at the forefront of sikhi and i cannot ignore that.

its like this these days they are like this but not in the past all our Gurus came from this community we have to reignite that fire of Sikhi within them

any one from doaba area care to shed light on Sikh Saini community and Sikh rajpoot community, they are rural are they more similar to khatris or Jatts

14 minutes ago, proactive said:

We had our version of Hindtva long before the Hindus even came up with theirs. It was called PANTHIC SOCH. Unfortunately nowadays Panthic soch means being complicit in the demographic and love jihad against our own people. People like Ravi Singh and others of his ilk masquerading as Panthic are the ones who over the last 20 years have degraded Panthic soch into liberalism. 

in order for us to make this thing work we gotta get rid of all these liberal types, hindu suck ups, and then start all over again clean, we can't get rid of one without getting rid the other to make this work for our ppl

1 hour ago, proactive said:

I know this will not be a popular opinion but as Sikhs we should at least be grateful that the BJP is in power rather than the Congress. These Congress s.cum would  empower their Muslim vote bank like nothing we have seen. I just wish the BJP would deport the illegal Bangladeshis and Rohingyas out of India. At least this would cut the Muslim population of Punjab. 

bro id be lying if i said i didn't agree with some sentimens of BJP when it comes to muslims and christian conversion rates the thing is we need our own SIkh version of hindutvas 

both groups make social media accounts tryin to besti our sisters so why care about theirs, let them handle it themselves 

yes for me also

On 12/31/2021 at 11:19 PM, 5aaban said:

The image of Muslim females on this forum is far too "innocent". Many Muslimahs these days engage in haram activities behind their families backs, even when wearing a Hijab. These are quickly swept under the carpet by their communities. 

lets be real stereotypes exist for a reason. the stereotype of Muslim women is they wont respond to ppl men chasing them,and even if they do their families will kill you. others see Punjabi women are known to be approachable and potential for dating and they dont have to worry about her brothers uncles coming for them.

Only way for SIkhi to handle these ppl is that we have to shame them and we also have to call them non Sikhs for doing these things

22 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

when sikhs were getting attacked during the 70s,80s and 90s and killed mercilessly, all these christian hindus and muslims got together and did horrible things to us. Why should we care? They have many countries they can take refuge in when <banned word filter activated> hits the fan.What will we do?

absolutely agree we shouldn't actively get involved, but we should use these atrocities to highlight hindutva violence on minorities  and present them to the world stage and use it to benefit us. Don't get me wrong however i feel that if a Sikh does come across a christian or muslim being attacked if the Sikh can hide them he or she should. When these hindus come for our community all of us abroad will have to take action and pressure govts i think Sangat world wide should start gathering money for this scenario 

On 12/26/2021 at 2:29 PM, dallysingh101 said:

I think that's just normal jut cultural behaviour, so maybe that's why many 'Sikh' juts wouldn't think much of it? That's why they let these things slide. 

You can kidnap and rape their womenfolk, but a short while later, for political purposes, it's all water under the bridge. No true izzat.  

arent most jammu kashmiri and azad kashmiri ppl of Rajput and sudhan backgrounds rather then of jutt