Amrit World

Please discuss this Punjabi article: - http://www.ajitjalandhar.com/20060724/mags/dharam1.htm

'Das Nimana', now you have my sympanthy with you. You do not know what YOU have written in your previous posts. You called Amarinder Singh a better Sikh, now you changed your statement. You are a real politician. Every politician wants 'kursi', so does Badal. Nothing strange, dear. Yes, he married his son to a famous Congress family, but why don't you tell the forum that he brought his son-in-law into Shiromani Akali Dal? Many people called him congress agent and it is on the record. It does not matter if he was a congress agent or not. He is now part of history. For those, who want to know, not one, but many writers wrote that he was a congress agent. Read, 'Bhindranwale: Myth And Reality'. :T: I do not fall in this age group. :T: Even Simranjit Singh Mann and Daljit Singh Bittu do not represent Sikh youth. :T: There are youth wings of many political parties in Punjab. Only a few are associated with Mann and Bittu, others are either with Youth wing Badal or Youth Congress. :T: You called him better Sikh, now you changed your statement. Dalits are 36% of Punjab. See where their votes go. You are now exposed, 'Das Nimana'. It was spokesman, which highlighted Gurbaksh Singh Kala Afghana. It was spokesman which backed him. Only a 'Kala-afghanist' can support Spokesman. You support him, so you are obvious a 'Kala-afghanist'. No? If no, tell how? :T: Spokesman is being used to promote 'Congressism'. Anti-Sikh, anti-Punjabi-Sikh, anti-Sikh-youth, Kala-Afghanist, pro-congress, pro-Spokesman are same. A person, who calls Amrinder Singh a better Sikh, does not know what the Sikhi is. Before going on with your Congress-election-campaign, please read your own posts. It is clear that you cannot reply to the points in my previous posts. At least, do you condradict yourself. Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit'

Before making any further statement, dear Mahtab Singh Ji, you should visit Sikh missions in UP and Maharashtra etc. Go to 'Vanjaaras' anywhere in Maharashtra, UP, Rajasthan etc. See how people of Bharat want to accept the Sikhism. I have had the chance to meet some of them. There are thousands of Sikhs in Bharat, who are not from Punjabi origin. Try to meet them. Try to meet many Sindhis in Gujrat and Maharashtra. India is NanakPanthistan.

Early books written by Sikhs do not mention any woman taking 'Khande Kee Pahul'. 'Sri Gur Sobha' was written by Guru Gobind Singh's court poet 'SainaPati'. He does not mention any woman taking 'Khande Kee Pahul'. Same is with Bhai Kuyer Singh, who wrote 'Gur Bilas'.

This thread is an example, who anti-punjabi-sikh people do 'Thuk Ke Chattna'. 'Das Nimana', if Mintu does not represent Sikhs of Punjab, same is with you. We do not know even your real identity. How can you represent all the people you support? You, as any pro-punjabi-sikh can guess, are against Sikh youths. You know whenever Congress comes in power, Sikh youth suffer. It happened even during Capt. Amarinder Singh's rule, who you think a better Sikh than Badal. You still have not replied my points on Amarinder Singh and you dare to say that anti-punjabi-sikh people on this forum have replied all of my points. Before going further with your anti-punjabi-sikh agenda, please at least try to respond my points. :T: Yes, I agree that you have no answers. I never said in this thread that Badal is a true Sikh. Show me where I said. He is a politician and a big politician than Simranjit Singh Maan. I have provided data. Not I, but facts speak. It is Manmohan Singh's govt, which came forward to help victims of Delhi riots. If you were in Punjab and not blind, you would have read every newspaper giving lots of news and photos where DCs and SDMs gave cheques to the victim. Speak your mind please. Are you hurt that Manmohan Singh helped poor victims of Delhi riots becasue they are not pro-Pakistani or pro-Khalistani? :T: And dear 'Das Nimana', you quoted and believed 'Spokesman'. Oh Bholeya, Hun Billi Thailey Vicchon Baahar Aa Gyee. You are a 'Spokesman' child. Do not befool yourself. Mintu did not call ANY Sikh anti-Punjabi-Sikh. Can you not read carefully. Every Sikh in Punjab knows that Sikhs abroad love us. Those who are anti-Punjabi-Sikh are Pakistani agents in disguise. If you were in Punjab, you could have seen Sikhs abroad doing election 'parchaar' for Badal's party. A person reading newspapers knows why Simranjit Singh Maan was defeated during 'Lok Sabha' elections. They were not from Punjab, but from USA, who successfully launched campaign against Simranjit Singh Maan. They even gave advertisements in newspapers. Did you not read them? Don't you know what allegations these Sikhs from US made againt Maan? You know, but you will not tell. Yes, allegations are there against Badal. Allegations are there Maan. Allegations are there against Amarinder Singh. Should we follow 'Facts' or your 'Shardha' for Maan and Amarinder Singh? 'Das Nimana', were you born as a Sikh? No, you were born as a Punjabi, if we believe that at least one of your statement is true that you live in Punjab. So, you are first Punjabi, then you are Sikh, if so. A person is Punjabi from the point he takes birth in Punjab. He becomes Sikhs on a later stage, if he desires so. So for as Brahmanvad is concered, as a poster raised this point in this thread, again it is an individual's choice what he chooses. If he/she likes Brahmanvaad, he has the right to do. It does not mean you start killing unarmed Hindu bas pessengers. Yes, Brahmanvaad is an issue, but there is even bigger issue. That is 'Mullavaad' or 'Kathhmullavaad', which says, "Follow us otherwise we will shoot you dead". This kind of 'Mullavaad' is a big danger to Sikhs living in Punjab. It is a good sign that Sikhs living in Punjab have started to reject these 'Mullavaadi' people in Sikh disguise. After all, Punjabi Sikhs are brave. They faced Sikander. They faced Lakhpat Rai. They faced Aurangzeb. They faced Frukhsiyre. They faced British. They faced Indira Gandhi. They faced terrorits. They are now facing 'Mullavadi' people in Sikh disguise. Where are Sikander, Lakhpat Rai, Aurangzeb, Frukhsiyer, British, Indira Gandhi in Punjab? Punjabi Sikhs are still there in Punjab. Similarly, 'Mullavaadi' anti-Punjabi-Sikh peope surely will be defeated and Punjabi Sikhs will live forever. Regards.

Dear 'Babbar Khalistani' :T: , Dear Das Nimana, Both of you have not replied the points in my previous posts. It is because you have no answers. First of all, address my points. Beating about the bush does not work in a 'Discussion'. It is a discussion forum. It is not that you continue to say what you want, and do not reply to the points given against your views. It is the people of Punjab, who elect their leader, not other people living out of Punjab. It is the Sikh people of Punjab who elect their leaders for the SGPC, the lagislative assembly and the parliament. Sikhs abroad have nothing to do with it. It is absolutely internal matter of Sikhs living in Punjab. One says, 'Sikhs in Punjab are blind'. Then he wants people believe that he is not slandering Sikhs in Punjab. Okay, if you think so, let the readers decide if you are slandering or not. As a Sikh living in Punjab, I know it does not matter at all if a few 'faceless internet warriors' criticize Sikhs in Punjab. I think only one example is enough to prove that people like 'Das Nimana' make false statements. He says 'Dalit rally' by Badal was 'flop', but fact is there in newspapers: http://www.ajitjalandhar.com/20060724/main2.htm#k4 :T: We still need to guess who 'Das Nimana' is? Go to http://www.eci.gov.in/, and try to understand why Badal's party could not come in power. Also see how many votes Simranjit Singh Maan's party got. Congress got 35.81%, Badal's party got 31.08% and Maan's party got 4.65% of votes polled. Now any one can see that if Maan's party had not there, and votes polled in his favour were polled in Badal's party favour, Badal would have been the present CM of Punjab. One can understand that Maan's party helped the Congress come in the power. If you still think us blind, it is okay. Even the BSP, which is considered a 'Dalit' party got more votes than Maan's party. :T: Now say that 'Dalits' of Punjab are blind. :T: Sikhs living in Punjab can SEE who is helping whom. (Check data of last elections). People living in Punjab can SEE that voting for Maan's party means helping the Congress. The facts in my previous posts are still unanswered. They are unanswered, because they are the facts. Long live Sikhs in Punjab, Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit'

Dear 'Das Nimana', You were the person, who wrote to me, "Oye Saun Ja !". Now you are saying, "you people are sleeping." Dear 'Das Nimana', before you continue with your such posts, reply to the points raised in my previous posts. I know you have no answer. At least do try. Or, simply accept that you know nothing. I have raised a few questions, each of which has only one answer. Thus, my points are straightforward. If you do not know difference between 'Dalit Sikh' and 'Dalit Punjabi', it is not my fault, dear. Was this rally orgainised for 'Dalit Sikhs' or 'Dalit Punjabis'? Yes, Sikhism does not promote caste system, but caste is a part of Sikh politics. There are seats researved for particular castes in the SGPC. Badal did not start researvation in the SGPC. Did you ever see voter form ofthe SGPC? There is seprate column for a few castes. Badal did not start this system. Castes are there in Sikhs. You praise Simranjit Singh Maan. What is the word 'Mann'? You follow people who write their subcaste in their names. You have NO right to talk about caste system. So, you do not know about them either. Do you want me to name Khalistanis who wrote their subcaste in their names? :T: \ He changes his statements accordingly. Not so different to you. He said he would not enter parliament without sword. He went there without sword. Anandpur Sahib Resolution does not demand for Khalistan. 'Babbar Khalistani' says Sikhs in Punjab are blind. If he is right, then please find a non-Sikh, who can read Anandpur Sahib Da Mataa for you. :T: It does not matter if I support it or not. It has nothing to do with this discussion. :T: If someone's views are different to me, it means his sister was raped? Thousands of my sisters were raped across the world. Sikh women raped by Pakistanis in 1947 were my sisters. Hindu women raped by terrorists in Kashmir and Punjab were my sisters. Sikh women raped in Punjab and Delhi were my sisters. Mattu was my sister who was raped in Delhi. Katia was my sister who was raped in Punjab. I am a Sikh, so every single woman, who is not my wife, is my sister. That is why my views are so clear. If anyone's sister was raped by a Hindu, it does not give him the right to be a terrorist and kill every Hindu. Do not be so foolish on a discussion forum. See how you mentioned 'sister' and see how I mentioned 'sisters'. This is the difference between you and a Sikh. I care, that is why I am replying to your foolish points. I want you to be a Sikh. To be a Sikh, you have to remove hatred from your heart. You have to remove dirty thoughts from your brain, if any. New generation? I was born in 1972. How old are you? Dear 'Bazurago', you have been brainwashed by 'Mulla-vaadi' people. If you think I am sleeping, then why did you send me PM to say, "Oye Saun Ja" (go to sleep)? And you think you did not fell prey to them? They are successful. See 'Babbar Khalistani' calls you blind (because you claim that you live in Punjab). Go to so-called 'Sikh' forums, where they openly say bad words for their Sikh brothers living in Punjab. Don't you think such websites are working for the RSS? As you do not know about Sikhs living in Punjab, you do not know about milittants, you do not know about Anandpur Sahib resolution; you do not know about the RSS either. When you are slandering Gursikhs of Punjab on this discussion forum, the 'Prachaarak' of RSS is working in your villages. You do not care about them. But you have enough time to slander GurSikhs of Punjab. Not only Sikhs, even thousands of Hindus, Muslims, Dalits etc were killed since 1947. Even in Punjab, many many Maoists were killed in fake encounters. Do you raise your voice for them? No. Because they were trying to liberate Dalits of Punjab. I have written on fake police encounters in Punjab, anti-Sikh riots in Delhi etc. That too in 1993. (http://www.amritworld.com/gallery/book_release.html). Tell me what you have done since then. To be continue......... Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit' (Dear 'Das Nimana', do not make another meaningless post, until you reply all the points raised by me, please).

Dear 'Babbar Khalistani' :T: The discussion can go further only if you reply all the points raised in my previous posts. That is the way to discuss an issue. It is not that you continue to raise your points, and I reply. For that purpose, I have a forum, where only a few selected persons can visit: http://amritworld.com/forum/list.php?4 The facts in my statements are straightforward, dear 'Babbar Khalistani'. :T: And you have not replied to my points, so it proves that you have no answer. I am clearly referring to people, who are anti-Sikh and who slander Sikhs living in Punjab. You have called Sikhs in Punjab blind. It is clearly slander. There are thousands of GurSikhs living in Punjab and you call them blind. A person calling GurSikhs blind is nothing but a slanderer. PROVE my statements false, if you can. Otherwise accept the truth written in my posts. Even if you do not accept, truth is truth. Again a false statement by yourself. Badal was not in power in last 22 years. He was not even president of Akali Dal or the SGPC, or the CM of Punjab when trouble started in Punjab. You don't see? Really? You mean you are blind? A person, who can see, knows what Gurmat says, "Ninda Koi Na Sijheyo, Iyon Ved Ughattai". Find a GurSikh who can explain this line to you. Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit'

In my reply, I asked if the sender :T: knows difference between Anandpur Sahib Resolution and demand of Khalistan by Simranjit Singh Maan. :T: You should be very-very thankful that 'Dalit Chetna Rally' was a flop, as you believe. Oh Bharaava, Je Punjab da Dalit jaag Pya, Ta Soch what will happen to your 'community'? Dalits were awaken in Talhan. You know what happened then? :T: Well, this is why the sender of that PM :T: wrote to me, "Oye Saun Ja !" ? :T: Jaage Hoye Lokaan To Kaafi Dar Lagda Hai? :T: "Jaagauh Jaagauh Suteyo, Challeya Vanjaara" (Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji)

Dear 'Babbar Khalistani' :T: I am not defending Parkash Singh Badal. Read my posts carefully. I am just stating facts. Badal does not need any defence from me. People make posts against him, it does not harm him; and if someone defends him (as you call it), it does not give any defence to Badal. He does not care who writes against or in favour of him. Why should he care either? How many Punjabis visit discussion forums? You have called us blind, but I will not call Sikhs outside India blind; because most of them now know the ground reality of Punjab. I have very good well wishers outside India. They are GurSikhs. They are worried about Punjab, but they do not slander GurSikhs of Punjab or India. In fact, we are not blind. During recent years, we have learned too much. We can see things more clearly. We can see what is coming next. We can see who are the people who are not happy to see Sikhs in Punjab happy. We can see who are the people who just love to slander us. We can see what is going to happen to them. We can see why Indian govt does not ban anti-India and pro-Khalistani websites. We can see which team is working to remove the name of Sikhism in India. We can see who are the people who do not want Sikhism to be spread in other parts of India. We can see who are the people who are trying to create inferior complex among Sikhs in India. We can see that India is ours. We can see that non-Sikh Indian want to be Sikhs of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji. We can see who are the people who do not want so. We can see why they are trying to stop us. We can see why they are calling us blind. But, wait a minute. Perhaps you are right. We ARE blind. We are blind in love of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji-Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji. We are blind brother, we want to remain blind. We have see our Guru, what else should we see now. Brother 'Babbar Khalistani', call us whatever you like, but remember we cannot be abolished. Why? Because: - Khanda Jaa Kai Haath Maih, Kalgi Sohai Sees. So Hamri Rachheya Karai, Sri Kalgidhar Jagdish.

I have recieved a PM from a brother, who says he lives in Punjab. :T: I think I should write here one of my points. I am not a political activist. I am NOT associated with any any political party. As a researcher, I simply tell facts. For example, if I say Atal Bihari Vajpai is bigger leader than Parkash Singh Badal, it does not mean I am supporter of Atal Bihari Vajpai and against Parkash Singh Badal. I am just telling facts. Similarly, it is a fact that number of Badal's supporters is bigger then that of Simranjit Singh Maan. It is a fact. I do not wear blue turban, it does not make me 'Anti-Akali'; and I do wear mostly white turban, it does not make me a Congress man. I sometime wear saffron turban, it does not make me a supporter of 'Hindu nation'. :T: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear 'Babbar Khalistani' :T: If you are in Punjab, then vote for Simranjit Singh Maan. Elections are near. Try to bring him in power. :T: You know how many votes he needs to become CM of Punjab. Just slandering Badal will not work. :T: Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit' www.amritworld.com

Are you serious? Check the data of last assembly votes. His party was defeated because a big part of Hindus in Punjab did not vote for the BJP. Check the data dear 'Anti-Badal'. Well, I know you will not, becaues you do not want to face the truth. If you think, his party was defeated becuase he forgot 'Amritsar Declaration', then please tell why those, who di not forget 'Amritsar Declaration' were defeated? :T: If Sikhs in Punjab were against his party, then why his party won the SGPC elections, where only Sikh voters vote? :T: No dear, he is TRYING to break old records set before him. :T: You like him? Really? I live in Mohali, brother. And he purchased a 'Kothi' in my city. You know what was his name on the papers he signed? Do you know? I think you know. :T: Because even a child living in Punjab knows. :T: And you know how many seats he could win in Punjab? :T: And, dear, you like him. Dear you like him despite the fact that he created divisions in Panth. Oh dear, you like him, though other Takhts' heads during his time disliked. I can read it clearly, but try to read what is NOT written in it. I have no authority to declare who is true Sikh. Only Guru has the right. Anti-Badal people even killed people. So what? Still, he is big political leader in Punjab than Simranjit Singh Maan. Check the list of Punjab's MLA. Check the list of SGPC members. You forgot to mention lastest incident, where turbans of Badal's supporters were removed. Why are you so biased? Don't you know how many votes are needed to elect as many MLAs as Badal has in Punjab? Yes brother, 'Millions of people'. Please read The Mission Statement on my website. I am not associated with any political party. It is not difficult to get a ticket, but be sure, I will NEVER join any political institution. If you are in Punjab, then open your eyes. You will know. Why do you think he is much better Sikh than Badal? Do you think he does not take part in 'Havan'? Do you think he does not drink? Do you think he does not eat meat? Do you think he does not go to temples? Do you think he does not put 'Tilak' on his forehead? Do you think he does not dye his beard? What makes him better Sikh? Even if I believe you are not supporter of Congress, it goes in favour of Congress in elections, when Sikhs give vote against Badal's party. It is politics, dear brother. Go to my site's gallery section, and try to understand why Capt Amarinder Singh gives Siropas to anti-Badal Sikhs. :T: If they are genuine, they do not mind open meetings. If they are hiding something, they need 'Gupt' meetings. Simple. Dear, I am not hidden anywhere. You can check what I do in my real life. What about you? What is your real name? What is your real whereabout? Come to me. Meet me in my house. Do not worry. I will not tell any body online that you are anti-Sikh or pro-congress. Promise. Please remain against him if you want him in power again. I am sure it will help him. He would love people like you making posts online. Otherwise you would go open in punjab, which would definitely be harmful to his party. I suggest you to start a website against Badal, like anti-badal.com. You can start a blog either. It is free on bloggers.com You have no authority to change anyone's name. And how badal is Chandu's supporter? Is there any body on this planet, who is Chandu's supporter? People simply believe that Chandu never existed. It does not make them Chandu supporters. And, you will NEVER tell the forum that Badal brought them into the Akali Dal? :T: Okay, speak your mind.... Are you hurt that a traditional Congress family became Akali, only because of Badal? :T: Brother, if you are anti-Congress and still unmarried, then get married to a Congressi girl. Then, try to bring her to political party of your choice. :T: Thank you very much. Now we know your district. :T: The best way to serve Sikhi is to be a true preacher of Sikhism. So, be a 'Parchaarak' and remain in Punjab. If Badal goes, some other corrupt politician will take his place. Making childish posts on a forum, where only a few Sikhs from Punjab visit, makes no difference. It does not matter if every single Sikh of UK/US/Canada goes against Badal. The MLAs and members of the SGPC are elected by people of Punjab (Haryana Sikhs also take part in SGPC elections. One seat each from HP and Kashmir is there). And most of them do not come online, so go to them, go to public. Otherwise, you are wasting your own and others time. Do not forget that most visitors of Sikh forums are teenagers or young people. Tell them something positive. Tell them something they can do for the Panth. Tell them great Guru-history. Tell them deep meanings of Gurbani. Tell them Sikh culture. Tell them to love people. Tell them to respect parents. Do you think you behave like a 'Nimaana'? Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit'

Yes, it is very obvious. It is already written on walls. Try to read and if you can read, then try to understand. Read the title you gave to this thread. You say, "WHEN WILL SIKHS IN PUNJAB LEARN?" Simply, you are saying that Sikhs in Punjab have not learned till now. Is this not slandering? Yeah, I am. That is why I told that Sikhs in Punjab will be teaching good lessons. We, Sikhs in Punjab, can teach you only when we are in our senses. Because we are in our senses, so we will teach good lessons. Slandering? Means 'Ninda'? You forgot, "Ninda Bhali Kisee Kee Naahi, Manmukh Mugadh Karen"? Or you simply wanted to 'CRITICIZE' him? Still, you have NO right to call him 'Parkash CHAND Badal'. Criticism is not so easy to do. For this, you have to learn, as Sikhs of Punjab already have learned. I will not ask you, "Are you in your senses?" Any person in his senses knows why I will not. Well, if you think making such posts on SikhSangat.com will remove him and his son from the scene, then please continue to do so. I believe any supporter of Parkash Singh Badal would like you making posts on any such forums. Why? Because they know only a handful Sikhs in Punjab use internet. You can contact the Admin of SikhSangat.com and can confirm from them. They can tell you how many people from Punjab visit/post on this website. Dear 'Anti-Badal', I am a moderator on a Sikh forum. I have my own websites. I am associated with other websites as well. I know how many people from Punjab visit my sites. If you are in Punjab, then go to the public of Punjab. Go to villages of Punjab. Go to cities of Punjab. Go to newspapers in Punjab. And, tell them what you are saying on this website. Follow Simranjit Singh Maan. He does so. And if you are in Punjab, you must have known how many Sikhs follow him. Well, you know that it is not easy to remove Parkash SINGH Badal. At least, you cannot do this. :T: See, now you agree in your heart. No? Hai Ke nahi? Chalo chhaddo Paraanh. I live in Mohali. Where do you live? Can we meet? :T:

You are in Punjab and still you do not know what happened in Punjab since 1978? You are in Punjab and still you do not know what Sikhs in Punjab have learned? You are in Punjab and Sikhs abroad are your role models? You are in Punjab and still you slander Sikhs in Punjab? You are in Punjab and still you do not know why millions of people love Parkash Singh Badal? You are in Punjab and still you do not know why his party was defeated in last assembly elections? You are in Punjab and still you do not know why his party won the SGPC elections despite problems created by the Punjab Govt? You are in Punjab and still you do not know who are the people who are supporting and taking 'Siropao' from the Congress Chief Minister? You are in Punjab and still you do not know who hold 'Gupt' meetings with the RSS? If you need explanation, you can meet me. I am also in Punjab.

Do you mean 'Beer Ras'?

Sikhs in Punjab have already learned too much. In future, they will be teaching good lessons to those who slander GurSikhs in Punjab.

http://www.ajitjalandhar.com/20060718/ I am surprized to read this news. I had the experience to remain in Police custody :T: , but they never asked me to remove turban. I saw even a Nihang wearing Dumaala in Police as well as judicial custody. Forgot Nihang Ajit Singh Poohla? :nihungsmile: . He was in Dumaala when in Police as well as judicial custody. My father spent two years in jails during Punjabi Sooba Morcha. He was never asked to remove turban. But, yes, there was an incident, when my close friend was asked to remove his turban in Police station though there was no case registered against him. He is an Amritdhari Singh. For a minor issue, he was summoned to the Police station and was locked in a cell. When I reached there, he was in full turban. A Hindu police officer was on duty. He was trying to make other party reach on a compromise. Other party was an Amritdhari Singh. In fact, he was a so-called 'Charhdi Kala' Singh, because he wore his sword over his shirt. On the other hand, people in my circle wear sword under their shirts. Well, then a Sikh Police officer reached there and asked my friend to remove turban. My friend said that he would not remove his turban by his own hand. Then a relative removed his turban and my friend wore small turban or keski. The opposite party, also Amritdhari, insisted to remove turban of my friend. After a few minute, the Sikh Police officer left and the Hindu officer came to know about removal of turban. He came to my friend and asked him to wear turban again. My friend wore his turban again. Unfortunately, the Sikh Police officer came again and my friend was compelled to remove his turban. When Hindu Police officer knew this, he felt sorry for this. This is what I witnessed in a Police station of Punjab.

There are five parameters that can allow blocking of websites or blogs in India. One is threat to sovereignty and second is threat to security of the country. Pro-Khalistan websites are neither any threat to sovereignty of India, nor are they threat to security of India. Dear brother, I am in India and this website is not available. I think it was already banned. The official website of Bajrang Dal, a radical Hindu origanisation was banned long before.

Yes, Rahul Yadav's website is banned. The important website banned is www.hinduhumanrights.com . The blog exposingtheleft.blogspot.com is included in the list.

I have a list of a few websites and blogs that are banned. Before making any statement in this regards, one should know that a few redical Hindu websites are included in this list.

Thousands of people are cured by Yogaasans and Yog-kriyas told by Swami Ramdev and others. I know many people personally, who are cured. I have been practising YogKriyas for years and no doubt these are wonderful. Ramdev is though known for his Yoga exercises, he heads 'Divya Yog Mandir Trust' ( http://www.divyayoga.com/main.htm ), which also uses Ayurveda to their patients, under the guidance of Acharya Bal Krishan. Though, it is said that Brahmgyani Patanjli ji was not founder of Yoga, he was definitely a great Guru of 'Raaj Yog'. His 'YogSutra' is a great book on Yoga. Every Yogi finds his roots in Patanjli's Yoga. Because Patanjli was a Brahman and follower of Vedic tradition, his work (YogaSutra) is considered a Brahmanical literature. Many Hindu scholars have written 'Bhashya' on Sri Patanjli's YogaSutra. Still, no one can explain it perfectly. After all, it was written by Patanjli. Ayurveda is 'Up-Veda' and thus it is a part of Brahmanical literature. Ayurveda is a great medical system and now it is getting popularity even in Englistan and other countries. Oh yes, you can use Yoga and Ayurveda for your hair. It is so simple and easy. Go to any Ayurvedacharya or Yoga teacher (I am not talking about Yogi Bhajan's yoga teachers). It depends on your age and cause of hair lose.

Dear brother Pritam Singh Ji, where did you read that Sikhs in Punjab's jails are not allowed to wear turbans?

'Das Nimana' wrote: - There is only one Sikhism. The ideology given by Gandhi is being taught as 'Gandhian Studies' in many institutions across the world. It is taught up to PhD level. Sikhism of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji says, "Naanak Phikkai Boliyai, Tan Man Phikka Hoye". Sikhs follow Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and do not use any 'Phikka' word, as some people used on that blog. Regards, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit'

(1) First of all, he wrote about Sindhi Hindus...... Adwani, Lalwani etc are Sindhi Hindus' surnames. (2) Then, he wrote about Malyalis. Nair, Menon are Hindu Brahmans' Gotras. (3) He then wrote : - What are the degrees of egoism in Tamil Nadu? I, Iyer, Iyengar. Iyengers are Tamil Brahmans. (4) Then he makes comments about Khalistan. (5) He goes further and makes fun of A.P. (Andhra Pradesh, a state of India). ( 6) He makes comments about India's nation song 'Jan Gan Man'...... (7) He wrote, "What do you call a bong who talks a lot, sometimes without making sense? Mr. Chatter Jee." Chatterjee is a surname of Hindu Bengalis. (8) See these comments, "What do you call a bong who takes bribe? Mr. Goosh" Ghosh is a surname of Bengali Hindus. So, if you think he is anti-Sikh because he made comments on Khalistan, then you will have to accept that he is anti Hindu, anti-Andhra and anti-India. Agrawal is a surname of Vaishya community. In Hindi or Punjabi, they are mostly known as Baniyas. Agrasen (as in its url) was a mythological (many believes him a historical) figure of Vaishyas, who was once King of Agroha in India. So, he is niether Brahman, nor Jatt. He is vaishya. And if he is anti-Sikh (as a few of you think), he is then anti-Hindu also. A few comments by visitors against Hindus on that blog are very bad. A Sikh cannot use such a bad language.

It was Agni 3. Before this, Agni 1 and Agni 2 were successful and have been given to the Army. India is not the first case, where such rockets failed. It will not take much time, when you will see Agni 3 lauched successfully.