Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'darshan singh'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type



Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start



Website URL



Found 3 results

  1. I find it quite interesting that extremist missionaries always used to say that that there is no such post as "Jathedar of Akal Takhat". Yet after Ex-Jathedar Ragi Darshan Singh joined up with the extremist missionaries by denouncing the Dasam Granth Sahib, they did an interesting thing: They would describe him as "Sabka (ex) Jathedar, Akal Takhat, Singh Sahib Darshan Singh". Yet to refer to the sitting Jathedars, they would say "so-called Jathedars". That's quite strange. If you think a post is made up, why would you describe someone as a former holder of that imaginary post? Now let me introduce the Emperor of the United States. Joshua Norton was a drifter who in 1859 declared himself to be Emperor of the United States. If you've read the US Constitution, or even if you haven't, you should know that there is emphatically no such post. Joshua Norton was a nutcase. How much sense would it make to introduce him as a former (or current) Emperor of the United States, in the manner that ex-Presidents of the US are presented? It wouldn't make any sense whatsoever. So now, to the point: Why do missionaries describe Ragi Darshan Singh as ex-Jathedar when (according to them), the post of Akal Takhat Jathedar is as imaginary as that of Emperor of the US? The answer, friends, is will to power. They will say anything and everything to gain power, and once they do, they will change all the rules to consolidate power, just as in every Communist revolution. Once they get power, they will forget that they ever said there is no Jathedari of Akal Takhat, rather, they will use that power to ex-communicate any Sikh that believes in God, Guru, and Sikhism.
  2. A Singh from Calgary, Canada is doing a great seva by using color as a way to tell Gurbani readers where vishram comes in Gurbani. Trouble maker, self appointed, pig, Harnaam Singh Dhumma has used his poltical ties with Sri Akal Takht Sahib Jathedar to stop this seva. This seva is really needed today. The Singh is from Taksal and has used Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji recorded katha of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji to put in vishrams in Gurbani with using two different colors. No altering of any kind has been taken place by this Singh. Dhumma is only stopping this seva because he is not making money off of it. Sant baba Kartar Singh ji and Sant baba Gurbachan Singh ji Khalsa have never been against vishrams and have used vishrams themselves. This issue needs to go out in the public and Baba Darshan Singh ji needs to be supported. Dhumma is a cancer in the Khalsa Panth. Here are to links to news articles on this matter. In the second link there is a video of Baba Darshan Singh ji explaining the whole ordeal. Those who call themselves students or associates of Taksal need to look into this matter and take a stand on the truth. https://www.sikh24.com/2015/05/01/akal-takht-sahib-orders-bhai-darshan-singh-malewal-to-stop-publication-of-sainchis/#.VW1l-NJViko http://www.sikh24.com/2015/06/02/baba-darshan-singh-replies-to-akal-takht-ban-on-pothis/#.VW1litJViko
  3. This is just some of the articles/videos. Who has this much time on their hands? Who gets paid to write all of this? Where is the funding and staff/employment coming from? Who is the RSS? Hmmmmm....... If RSS exists.....it has to be these missionaries/kala-afghanis/guru granth da khalsa panth people. These guys are absolutely pathetic. That's all they do. Put others down and create trouble/controversies/divisions. Save all of this,,,,as they are notorious for taking things down and acting as if they did nothing in the first place.
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use