vjkaram

"would this be masculine : ਅਕਾਲ ਮੂਰਤੀ?" ਮੂਰਤੀ is still feminine. not expert on grammar but know this much. ਮੂਰਤੀ can never be masculine.

in mulmantar however akal moorat means moorat that is akal (not affected by kal). everywhere moorat is feminine.

"so is ਮੂਰਤਿ as part of Akal Moorat feminine?" yes. ਮੂਰਤਿ is feminine. ask anyone who speaks any north indian language as mother tongue. akal moorat means akal di moorat not akal da moorat.

"ਏਕੇ ਕਉ ਸਚੁ ਏਕਾ ਜਾਣੈ ਹਉਮੈ ਦੂਜਾ ਦੂਰਿ ਕੀਆ ॥ He knows the True Lord as the One and only; he sends his egotism and duality far away. ਸਗਲ ਭਵਣ ਕੀ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਏਕਾ ਮੁਖਿ ਤੇਰੈ ਟਕਸਾਲਾ ॥੧॥ Yours is the one and only form of the entire universe; Your mouth is the mint to fashion all. ||1|| are these feminine or masculine use?" in second verse, ਏਕਾ is feminine because ਮੂਰਤਿ is feminine and ਏਕਾ is related with it. in first case, ਏਕਾ is not used as an adjective and not used with any noun. its not an adjective of any noun - masculine or feminine. this verse is not relevant in this debate.

Krishan is wahiguru and Raam is Wahiguru and so they are equal to Guru Nanak????????. What a pathetic thinking! How can such people who call Raam and Krishan equal to Guru Nanak and further call them wahiguru, be called Sikhs. They are Hindus in guise of Sikhs. What has become of this site? where are all the Kundalia Bir Khalsa? Gurbani is saying that there are millions or Raams in the dhoor of wahiguru and Gurbani is saying that Raam is gone and Ravan is gone but these hindu minded sikhs are saying that raam and krishan are wahiguru.

who says that avtarvaad concept is accepted in gurmat and gurbani? the Mool Mantar clearly states that Akal Purakh is "Ajooni" which means he does not take Avtar. Gurbani says that may such mouth be set on fire that says that Thakur Akal Purakh takes avtar.

its sad that some Sikhs like N3O, Kam1825 et al are violating Gurbani verse that says that Satguru should be praised as great - sathigur vaddaa kar saalaaheeai jis vich vaddeeaa vaddiaaeeaa || by calling Guru Nanak and his forms as Avtars of similar level as Krishan and Ram, you guys are not praising Satguru as Vadda. And all this hindu stuff as Ansa Avtar and this Avtar and that Avtar is not mentioned anywhere in Gurbani. This stuff is based on hindu holy texts and don't apply to Sikhi. its sad that this site has become a platform of hinduizing the Sikh faith.

how come no one mentioned N30? he's gotta be a brahmgiani representing western sikhs. all brahmgianis can't be in india alone.

It was fine to protest against the Ragi's program but the violence that took place over there has done so much damage to the image of Sikhs in Toronto that it will take quite some time before people forget about it. Questions are now being raised over the Sikhs' right to wear Kirpan. What was the need to beat them up? Was it all worth it? There must be other means to counter the poisonous preachings of Ragi and Party. All Singhs who were there that day must think that they are responsible if their actions result in hundreds of thousands of Sikhs facing problems following their Rehit of wearing Kirpan. The 53 year old person who allegedly attacked with Kirpan should be ashamed of his behaviour. He acted very childishly and now we all are going to suffer for his childish actions. Please act responsibly Singho!!