True, but when someone is arguing just for the sake of arguing, when someone isn't ready to listen, when someone isn't a jigyaasu but rather an irritant, when someone doesn't want to learn and just bicker, and to make it worse, when this someone uses insulting words and slanders a GurSikh (and thereby Sikhi) as a fraud making money off people, well, Dasmesh Pita has clearly stated in Zafarnama what is to be done
I think your forgetting the fact that Guru Nanak himself traveled to Mecca (Medina?) to engage in diologue with muslims. their is nothing in wrong with talking about religion, thier is nothing wrong with scrutiny, if you are so sure with your path then you can can deal with any type of criticism in a civilized manner.
Your use of Zafarnama as a pretext to attack people who dont agree with your views is completely contradictory to the proclamations creation.
The zafarnama was issued to relay the message to Aurangazeb that his army was defeated because he chose to act excessively, if you are trying to argue that this simple argument is a basis for an attack on a person who questions your religion, then I think you need to reread the zafarnama to understand what Gobind was trying to tell the mughal emperor.
Btw, last time I checked, thier is an entire sikh political body in Amritsar that is readily siphoning off the funds of the golden temple without the help of outsiders.