As is often the case, the discussion descends into simple generalisations with examples to suit one or another point of view.
Mentioning harmandir sahib as an example, is like using Mecca as an example of a mosque and St Peter's in the Vatican as an example of a church.
I am not disputing the importance of langar. I think it is an extremely important aspect of sikhism in what it symbolises and also what it means for sikhs in everyday life.
This discussion was started by someone criticising the fact that sangat (in many gurdwaras) are made to form a queue for langar.
My view (and of course, other views are available), is that this is a very trivial issue with respect to what langar is.
Two years ago people were discussing whether to have chairs in langar halls and now it is queuing. What will it be next?? Perhaps, whether their should be a quota for roti??
The substantive issue with langar is that it has gone from a simple meal that the community share to an extravagant feast....and for some people, it has now become the main reason why they attend.
and to Mr Bundha....a temple is a place of worship/house of God. Is that not what a gurdwara is??
MentalSingh - apology accepted.Thanks
and yes, if in a professional capacity I did work for a gurdwara, I would invoice them.