Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BoleSoNihal

  1. The beadbhi of Sri Guru Granth Sahib in Southall was first exposed by the Sikh Channel. Individuals showed a number of videos on YouTube which showed the condition of the so called biirdh saroops which were not biirdh. Subsequently, the Sikh media including the Sikh Channel failed to provide coverage. The perpetrators have gone unpunished and in fact rewarded with a saropa (how much does a saropa cost?). Is it any wonder that attacks on Sikh attacks are occurring? People against Sikhs will think if Sikhs can accept beadbhi to Sri Guru Granth Sahib then they will accept anything. Dr Gurnam Si
  2. When an animal is relentlessly pursued and cornered it can either submit or fight back. Animals are animals and choose to fight back and what's what appears to be the response of those behind the beadbhi and those supporting them. To run through what has happened - 1)The Guru Nanak Darbar Committee is the organisation (with a warehouse owner) behind the collection/ beadbhi of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Saroops dating back many years (they were previously warned and they agreed not to do this in future). 2)Recently, the issue has been discovered to be re-occurring at a warehouse with the invol
  3. Mahakaal96, You have raised asked some interesting questions. A group of Singhs and the Sikh channel (who first covered the news live) provided evidence of beadbhi, can you do likewise to support your comments? If you raise the matter by starting a new post, I would certainly read it. This issue seems simple enough, has a beadbhi occurred? In light of the evidence (and numerous independant statements), yes. So, what's next? Despite efforts to resolve the matter particularly from Khalsa Diwan Afganisatan and the Afgani community, progress has stalled. Subsquently, there has been no public stat
  4. Mahakaal96, this particular topic is asking about the point of the Sikh media but you raised some interesting questions which I've commented on in the beadbhi post. In contrast, Gurnam Singh made an arrogant emotional response; How does he know this? why is it always about comparing money with some people? Seems like Dr Gurnam Singh does not value the Sangat's £5 per month contribution... and prefers big rich donors. What a humble attitude, does Gurnam Singh or the Sikh Channel have delusions of grandeur? State the evidence, wait a minute didn't Dr Gurnam Singh say 'Sikh Channel has
  5. Well done Dr Gurnam Singh, finally a statement from Sikh Channel. A defensive statement that makes a personal attack and avoids the questions... Whats the point of Sikh media if Sikh media can't cover issues like beadbhi of Sri Guru Granth Sahib? Firstly, I'm not seeking to expose anything, I asked a simple question and have no involvement with this matter. I read the news like everyone else. As for this statement, no true Sikh, Singh or Son of Guru Gobind Singh would say this. And yes, you need forgiveness for stating this. skaur8888 Yes, you are right. Sikh Channel is doing good. But
  6. Brit Hits was a television channel broadcast via the Sky Digital satellite platform to the United Kingdom on channel 215, previously on channel 385. The channel, which was launched on 8 December 2008, was formerly known as Legal TV and Red TV. Brit Hits targeted an audience between 16 and 45 years old, focusing most of its broadcast on new up-and-coming British acts, as well as older British artists. In February 2009, Brit Hits was simulcasting Psychic TV, and also contained other non-related music programmes. It no longer showed music. Brit Hits closed on 13 April 2009 and was replaced by
  7. After reading Bhaji Taranpreet Singhs post, I thought I'd watch the programme on MATV due on from 7-8pm. Having never heard of MATV I looked through the TV channels to see what MATV was about. At approx 6.15pm, when I switched over to MATV I was surprised to see a programme about Hindu astrology. I thought it was the wrong channel so I switched to another channel. After checking a while later I switched back to MATV at 6.45pm and the same programme about Hindu astrology was on but I let the channel run. My son who was nearby asked why we were watching a Hindu channel. I had to explain that Si
  8. Wow, the stink of corruption, hypocrisy and double standards! This will spread very quickly unless Sikh channel comment. Can Sikh channel confirm or deny they have received donations from associated people?
  9. "Person disrespecting Sri Guru Granth Sahib shot by Sikh in police custody at Sahnewal"... http://www.sikhsiyasat.net/2012/08/31/person-disrespecting-sri-guru-granth-sahib-killed-by-sikh-in-police-custody-at-sahnewal/
  10. "High priests demand murder charges for showing disrespect to Granth Sahib"... http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-09-27/chandigarh/30208086_1_high-priests-anand-marriage-act-avtar-singh-makkar
  11. This what is says on; Sikh Channels website; Sikh Channel provides diverse, informative and interesting television which is accessible to the masses providing them with extensive knowledge about the Sikh faith and the current issues and affairs related to it. Sikh Channel also provides a wide variety of spiritual programmes including Kirtan (religious hymns), Katha (religious discourse), in addition to news, documentaries, chat shows and children’s programmes. Viewers are constantly invited to participate and present their own views; making Sikh Channel a great platform for thought, contemp
  12. The Sikh Channel (who are fully aware of this) opened a new studio nearby with an Akhand Path on 29th Sept 2013. Did they use the Torah, Bible, Koran, Puranas, Upanishads or Vedas for the Path? No, they used Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. They got down on their hands and knees and bowed their heads to the FLOOR in front of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. The guests made some amazing comments and speeches, all very nice. Waheguru must have enjoyed the show and the irony... The irony, if they used a Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji from Gurdwara Singh Sabha in Havelock Road, for blessings. Then they might have
  13. STOP YOUR DONATIONS - Ask the Sikh Media (TV, Radio, News Channels) why they are not covering beadbhi on Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji in Southall? Whats more important news than Sri Guru Granth Sahib? What are Sikhs without Sri Guru Granth Sahib? Read this post below, http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/72691-beadbhi-in-london/ The hypocrisy the Sikh media is showing is amazing. Even more amazing is that a Hindu channel MATV has stepped in to help with a LIVE program at 7-8pm on 30/09/2013! So, debate. Whats the point of Sikh media if Sikh media can't cover issues like beadbhi of Sri
  14. Very nicely put, but there's not much chance of getting Masands online. You can find plenty of Masands (Deceivers) counting the golak money though... Shame on Akaal, Sangat and Sikh Channel for not providing coverage and following up on this issue. MATV, a Hindu channel spent 1 hour of a LIVE show discussing what happened. Whatever people think about attacks on Sikh, it goes to show there are some good Hindu's who seem to respect Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji more than our own community and media!!! Just when you think you can't be surprised anymore, Waheguru provides a reminder. Hindu medi
  15. Does anyone know how much Sri Guru Granth Sahibs are being sold for on the black market? (no disrespect to Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji)
  16. Have anyone actually heard from the Guru Nanak Darbar Committee or the people that done this since the news first broke? It seems the Khalsa Diwan Afganistan are taking the right steps to resolve this but they didn't commit the Beadbhi and there has been no information to suggest anything has changed. News is slowing spreading by word of mouth and (rightly or wrongly) this will no doubt further damage the image of the Afgan community (its not as if Guru Nanak Darbar Committee hasn't been given enough time to fix this). The Sikh Channel seem strangely silent...
  17. AJ111 which hindu faction are you from? Who's "we"? Which part of "Raj Karega Khalsa" do you not understand? "Remember how Sikhs lived with arrogant pride"... really? "As respected Dr. Gurnam has said the idea of Khalistan is not practical or achievable." Where did he say this?
  18. AJ111 how ignorant you are... do you actually think politicians 'deserve' fame and respect? Manmohan Singh is NOT the most respected and famous Sikh in the world. Besides Sikh Guru's there are many, many more Sikhs that are more famous and respected... I would question whether Manmohan Singh is actually a Sikh? When/ where did he take amrit? does he carry the articles of faith? does he do simran/ nitnem/ path? Also, what sangat is he part of? He is a 'politician' that has personally done little to aid the Sikhs and is a congress puppet. Further, he has been unable to use his considerable po
  19. Wonderful story, wonder what happened to Maskeen afterwards? Is there a source for this Sakhi?
  20. It comes as no surprise to many that the Afgan Sikh community is behind this shame. If you allow Beadbhi of Guru Granth Sahib, then people will ask what kind of a religion do Sikhs have? If Sikhs can do this to themselves, what's stopping other people to be equally if not more disrespectful? If musulman or hindus did this, there would have been international news? Is this incident not a case of double standards? It doesn't look good for the Afgan Sikh community as a lot of other Southall Sikhs already believe they are ruthless greedy fraudsters that are only maya orientated. (Maybe, this i
  21. I hope masand's will not watch this and get any bright idea's... :stupidme:
  22. Dr Gurnam Singh, you have made some good points. (even if I disagree with most) If Sikhs awake and begin to carry out even half of what you have (very nicely) stated, then Badal Dal will be no more. However, I feel if Manjit Singh does have good intentions he will soon be removed. Others may dissect your comments in a less forgiving way... The "I'd rather be a hindustani than khalistani" point hurt... So which part of "hindu" or "hindustani" is Manjit Singh? "The non-Muslim people of the South Asian subcontinent called Hindu had no precise word for their religions. They were, as they are, d
  23. http://www.rediff.com/news/report/case-filed-against-manmohan-singh-as-individual-not-as-prime-minister/20130926.htm US court issues summons against the prime minister for crimes against Sikhs ahead of his arrival to meet US President Barack Obama. The Sikhs for Justice, a New York-based organisation, has filed a civil case against Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who arrives in the United States today, 'for his role in crimes against humanity perpetrated upon the Sikh community in India' at the US District Court for the District of Columbia, which issued a summons to appear before it within
  24. I've had some open conversations with western friends. They cannot understand how Sikhs can be so hypocritical ie. spending so much, having weird rituals, marrying in front of something holy, then partying, eating meat and drinking alcohol like no tomorrow. They do not understand what is or what is not part of Sikhism. Some have mentioned whether as a result of what they have seen, the same happens in Gurdwaras. Most think the hypocrisy is the same in their own religion... Some have mentioned that muslim's would not dare eat pork, hindus would not eat beef so why do the majority of Sikhs (inc
  25. Bhai Manjit Singh made some interesting points, notably choosing to be Hindustani rather than Khalistani and standing firmly by the Akali Dal alliance with BJP. The explanations for his and the Akali Dal position were not convincing. Bhai Manjit Singh's comments were seen as an anathema and we could feel the anger of the audience. I looked at the current 'Constitution of Shiromani Akali Dal' (English version) and in 12 pages, found the word 'Sikh' only once. The word 'Guru' was not mentioned. The words 'Akali Dal' were mentioned 70 times! You can view the document here http://eci.nic.in/eci_m
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use