MisterrSingh

Yes, I'd like to echo the above suggestion that your objection might be interpreted as envy on your part. Tread carefully. 

What are the origins of the fefty? I'm guessing the military.

1 hour ago, InderjitS said:

They visit Sikh sites, learn the lingo, then post daft scenarios and use responses in Dawah preaching or quote direct from here on their own sad forums to lure naive janta to Islam.

If we used the same tactics of mocking them by using their religious terminology and ways, they'd throw one of their infamous hissy fits. 

4 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

not living in hukam in a major way , so not really ready to follow the Guru ... just the truth bro

True. That doesn't mean there's something inside of them that doesn't crave the Guru. How they manage to get there is anybody's guess. 

2 hours ago, Kira said:

I'm not being harsh lol, im speaking from history.

That's fine. You're an excellent contributor to this forum, and I respect your opinions. You know I'm not one for advocating degeneracy and the kind of nonsense that passes for modern life in certain circles, but sometimes we forget that behind the ideologies and the loud voices, there are people like you and I who are just trying to make sense of it all, and maybe I'm being naive, but I'd like to think a bit of understanding and compassion for people goes a long way. I'm not suggesting we start conducting Anand Karaj ceremonies for trans people, lol. 

4 minutes ago, Kira said:

neither. They wouldn't be allowed to take Amrit. 

That's harsh, bro.

15 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I wonder if Trudeau gets offended if he met Mandeep Singh because it's got word 'man' in it. Should be called Peopledeep. 

Womandeep, or for the gender uncertain, Xirdeep.

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

He'll make a better PM than Trudeau. 

At least he won't be interrupting women who use the word mankind and replace it with peoplekind. 

Then pretend he was joking in order to save face. ?

1 hour ago, BhForce said:

While it's one thing for a child of less than 1/2 year to merely wear a shirt/kurta, I would not want to see a 3 year old's <banned word filter activated> dangling around in the Gurdwara Sahib. So I think that such a child's nakedness should be covered with a kachera.

The OP should be able to get some sewn up the next time she visits Amritsar. There's a Sikh tailor near the Langar entrance of Darbar Sahib.

I genuinely thought the kids were 2, 3, and 5 months, lmao. I went back and reread the original post, and it makes sense now, because unless she was growing the poor kids in plant pots, there's no way they could be that young!

That's fine; my mum dressed me in bana when I was 5. I had a tiny dastaar, mini kirpaan, chola, etc., on special religious occasions. Still, I would sound a warning that very young children shouldn't be wielded as religious accessories designed to virtue signal one's religious adherence. They aren't an extension of their parents' religiosity. Knowing our mindset as a community, we are prone to prioritising the external over the internal, and in that respect I'd argue since the child isn't fully aware of why they're being dressed up in that way, there's no spiritual benefit in doing so, because it's not a conscious choice on their part. However, if we're talking about "training" children to become accustomed to our ways and traditions, then starting them out early is a good thing. 

1 hour ago, Guest Busia Anda said:

You are either too stupid or dishonest, hard to tell....but I'm leaning on stupid. LOL! Its like the retard in class laughing at everybody else not knowing he is the joke. LOL!!!!!

You're that American Punjabi cuck who worships goreh, aren't you? Your name escapes me. Your prodigious use of LOL and undeniable air of mental retardation gave you away. Why don't you post with your regular account? We can get better acquainted. ?

2 hours ago, InderjitS said:

I think he's trying to make  the point of why at such a young age...they will have be worn on top of nappies/diapers, might look cute but hardly practical.

It's one way to get very young children to resent their religion and their traditions from the get-go. What form of cognition does a child of a few months possess that he or she could possibly be judged to be adhering to the particulars of their faith in that way? At that age it's akin to dressing up little dolls and showing them off to family and friends. I understand the need to start them off early, particularly in these irreligious times, but start with naam before anything else.

54 minutes ago, Guest Busia Anda said:

Without the common man voting these people into power none of it can happen. Stop being dishonest, very 'unSikhi' like. LOL! 

So you're back to agreeing with me that the man on the street is enabling these individuals into power, lol? Befqoof. You don't know your chittar from your elbow. Bandhar.

1 hour ago, Guest Busia Anda said:

And who have the Sikhs been voting for all this time? It's very convenient to blame Whites for all the ills of the country.

Who are the racists? What acts of racism have they done? Please tell us.

The white leadership. The politicians and the well-connected. There's a huge difference between the everyday man and woman and the people in charge.

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Dude. Those are all white washed diasporadic european jews. Real jews look nothing like that. 

Yes, they're what's commonly termed as the Ashkenazi Jews, who have Central European roots and congruous genetic features fairly similar to Anglo Saxons. There's another subgroup termed as Sephardic Jews, who resemble the Spanish and Portuguese. 

2 hours ago, Guest Busia Anda said:

Once white people become a minority, the country is going to change drastically. More then likely the UK will become a cross between Pakistan and some Middle Eastern nation. From there slowly but surely all the freedoms that you enjoy today, especially for the women, will be stripped away. It will happen on a gradual basis. The media and all other institutions will be controlled. Daily life will be extremely restricted. Things are going to change very drastically.

So to all the Sikhs living in the UK, might as well get prepared. 

The Labour Party will provide Britain with its first Prime Minister from a Muslim background as the Muslim population of Britain surges past the 10% mark in the coming decades. Dependent on various social situations, we will eventually see the Islamic equivalent of an anti-Semitism law. When that happens, just know that's the landmark moment that will herald the beginning of the squeeze on all non-Muslim minorities in Britain. Certain foolish, misguided whites will enable their own destruction, and drag down the rest of us with them. The seeds are being sown as of now. 

As amusing as it is to see the racists so agitated at this admittedly sound bit of science, it's a small piece of the puzzle in the larger scheme of things. I don't expect the kind of people who struggle to see what'll happen by the end of next week to be capable of recognising and extrapolating current developments decades into the future. 

11 minutes ago, Kira said:

Good luck there, the ones in power are either completely retarded or simply in it for their own means. 

In Canada? That's a shame. I thought there'd be at least a few who are fighting the good fight. 

3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

but don't you feel in Punjab it is more about the business transaction of marriage rather than the soul mission? yeah I know there are many hidden nastinesses discovered afterwards like the guys has a drug /alcohol problem  but Bollywood dramas reign supreme over there and slapperness over here.

Yes, I agree. Considering most of us on this site are religious to varying degrees, I think it's okay to suggest that what we're discussing can be pinned on a certain spiritual malaise that's affecting people, coupled with definite social issues that's also contributing to these problems. Whether these issues stem from something tangible that can be identified and rectified is debatable. 

Islam is the answer. Islam will succeed where others fear to tread. It will restore order and propriety to a decadent and degenerate culture that is determined to destroy itself. I'd feel sorry for the West only if it wasn't deserved. Any culture, race, or group that is blind to its inevitable destruction, and not only ignores the signs but eagerly heralds its own demise deserves nothing but contempt. Whether we drown with Westerners or not is a choice that is diminishing with every moment until there'll be no choice remaining at all. 

Nah, I'm kidding, divorce is all the rage in Punjab, too. Ain't no goreh there. ?

It's driven by business interests that have tapped into a market that's ripe for profit extraction. The ideological intent at the heart of these industries is debatable, and without evidence it's difficult to say either way. Basically, if there is an insidious agenda behind it all, it can be easily denied, and the accuser will end up resembling an unhinged loon. 

It does seem that the people behind these industries are acutely aware of the general characteristics of our collective psychology in a broad sense. Accordingly, their products are tailored to hit those marks and encourage us to "consume." Again, is it just basic capitalism or something more? Who knows.

16 minutes ago, NonExistant said:

Yeah i know its not accurate ?. Just wanted to make something that looked cool ?

Keep it up. Artistic expression is a wonderful outlet for all those little thoughts and feelings inside of us that wouldn't otherwise see the light of day. 

Technically, that's excellent. Good work. Historically, you probably don't need me to tell you it's far from accurate, lol.

21 hours ago, proactive said:

This scheme isn't really realistic. After decades of laxity you cannot suddenly expect everyone to conform. The way forward should be to allow Anand Karaj for now for those who are of a Sikh background and have not adopted any other religion. The Anand Karaj course is a good step and all couples having an Anand Karaj should be made to take this course. For making Amrit manditatory for Anand Karaj we should concentrate on the next generation- the kids who are now in their early years and make sure that there is strong parchar among them and create a strong Sangat for them. In time taking Amrit before Anand Karaj will become the norm for these kids and for the generations following them.  

Pandora's Box can never be closed, unless you go all ISIS on people, but that defeats the point of pursuing a spiritual path. Plus, the controversy and politics surrounding the enforcement of such AK guidelines, as suggested by OP, would be considered ultra-conservative at best, and extreme at worst. It would garner attention from the usual suspects for whom adherence to any form of identity, be it religious, national, etc., is considered to illiberal and antiquated, and you can guarantee the hit pieces flowing forth from even our own people in the western media would be framed on the lines of, "The Talibanisation of Sikhism." 

We are our own biggest enemies. There's no loyalty or affinity for Sikhi amongst the influential albeit non-orthodox sections of our people, moreso the so-called intellectuals who possess influence or a voice that can further our interests. We are all too eager to placate the "other" at the expense of our long-term goals. In contrast, we need only glance at Muslims to see the opposite in effect. It's actually quite startling how their prominent voices band together for their collective progression on the most important issues that face them, even when the supposedly insurmountable Sunni-Shia / 'progressive-slightly less progressive' divide separates them. It's funny when you see "opponents" gaming the media system and appearing to be in conflict, when in actuality they are on the same side. It's a long game being played, and they're playing it superbly.  Even their most liberal of adherents are burrowing away for their long-term interests in the west. But I digress.