GurjantGnostic

3 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

What do you make of the below text from internet?

mushrooms can serve as agents for promoting equitable economic growth in society. Since the lignocellulose wastes are available in every corner of the world, they can be properly used in the cultivation of mushrooms, and therefore could pilot a so-called white agricultural revolution in less developed countries and in the world at large. Mushrooms demonstrate a great impact on agriculture and the environment, and they have great potential for generating a great socio-economic impact in human welfare on local, national, and global levels.

When you know which edible species to eat, and have safety to farm absolutely. They're just a bad foraging food, because of numerous species and potential consequences. 

25 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

My mistake. I forgot animals.

Sewapanthis shud take care of animals too.

Baba pala singh gauuan wale used to take care of dogs, fish etc. apart from cows.

And we too are animals so we get way more bang for our buck. 

16 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Are you on crack? These are the kind of practices that give pro-Colonialists ammunition for their "civilising" activities in the East.

Morals? Ethics? Are you an animal?

Long hair don't care. By the time they're on my table their opinion is sort ..of..obsolete. 

But I'm a mixed race devil soo...I mean it'd be Jhatka and all that. 

3 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Dear veer

Are mushrooms good for humanity and environment?

Also can you tell, how to mention someone's ID name on this forum?

Yes, but nost of them kill you and have no nutritional benefit. It's the rare species of mushroom you can eat for food. They are really a medicine, or variety of medicines but it takes real expertise to identify them. 

For the mention you put the @ with their name right after it. And it'll let you select then. 

1 minute ago, shastarSingh said:

Itihaas link?

Not on hand. Sarovars for sure, I thought river too.  Gotta Ishnaan and Rehras Sahib, but lemme see if I can find something before sleep. 

31 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Sewapanthis r very important part of Khalsa panth.

Without them, it will be tough to implement Degh Tegh Fateh.

We need as many vetrenarians as possible. 

In Ithias we have farming Faujs and militant nomadic hunting, herding Faujs....to secure the farms. 

In Ithias there are historic examples of Jhatka for those that befoul water. 

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

Sikhs believe in DEGH TEGH FATEH.

Degh means food, clothing, medicines etc for all.

If we don't save our water, forests, agriculture, animals etc.

How will we hv langar, milk etc.

How will we do shikaar and get best wild meat?

How will we make natural medicines from plants if we cut plants and trees?

Amen bro. American indians tribes were divided into clans. Each clan was dedicated to understanding, learning from, and preserving a certain soecies or element for 7 generations. 

The clan representatives, from the tribes would collaborate with their counterparts in other tribes, so that all tribes were in the business of monitering and preserving the key resources and species.

And if we don't do the same, especially regarding the water table we in a very bad spot. 

5 minutes ago, 5aaban said:

Eastern Europe and Russia

In his book, The Gulag Archipelago, Soviet writer Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described cases of cannibalism in 20th-century Soviet Union. Of the famine in Povolzhie (1921–1922) he wrote: "That horrible famine was up to cannibalism, up to consuming children by their own parents — the famine, which Russia had never known even in Time of Troubles [in 1601–1603]".

North Korea

Reports of widespread cannibalism began to emerge from North Korea during the famine of the 1990sand subsequent ongoing starvation. Kim Jong-il was reported to have ordered a crackdown on cannibalism in 1996, but Chinese travelers reported in 1998 that cannibalism had occurred.

Both these serve as example why you agreesively cannibalize the enemy sooner, and keep it reserved for enemy combatants and blatant criminals only. 

And if you aren't already at war some how ..well you are now. 

1 minute ago, 5aaban said:

Many instances of cannibalism by necessity were recorded during World War II. For example, during the 872-day Siege of Leningrad, reports of cannibalism began to appear in the winter of 1941–1942, after all birds, rats, and pets were eaten by survivors. 

My dog is eating imperial with me. We're starting well before my dog gets hungry. 

Water is ten times more necessary than food. 

Before your body atrophies you should eliminate an enemy contingent or die trying. 

Earth worms. You dig up, or hunt at night by candle or flashlight. You soak them, and then cook, or roast them, and can grind it into powder. All insects are safe to eat. 

Also birds, easy to down with a stick. 

Dont eat the head, brain eapecially,  gives you mad human disease among other things, also is heavily narcotic and psychadelic, be careful the liver could kill you, would only want to nibble or avoid that and the rest is game and it should be cooked for as long as possible to avoid disease. 

Only the enemy dead and evil people are on the menu. Anyone breaks that rule, they get Jhatkad. Those killed for that are not on the menu to prevent accusations being levied to eat people. 

4 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

I didn't get your post???

I'm saying I regularly joke about cannibalism, and I'm fully prepared to eat people. So the babies can have whatever real food we have. And most people should be aware that with population density being what it is, any number of disruptions could lead to death by thirst, followed by hunger and cannibalism and finally starvation of a massive part of the populace. 

If you dont have water and land rights and a Fauj to hold it you best consider how you want your human cooked. 

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

Crops might fail if temperature keeps on rising.

Over population

Soil getting weaker and weaker.

So if there is acute food shortage in the future, can people become cannibals?

GurjantGnostic veer?

MisterrSingh veer?

I'm on record regarding my thoughts on cannibalism. How you want your imperial cooked? The lentils are for the children. 

I've literally discussed this now for the third time in two days. Lol. 

Avoid the head, watch how much of the liver you eat and cook it all to hell. 

Also consider earth worms and the insects, and birds. 

11 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

How?

Sorry didn't see that. Was watching tv with a friend. 

38 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Can you tell about bamboo uses?

It can be divided into fine fibers for clothing, seperated and laminated into boards and utensils of many shapes, it grows amazingly fast, it's a natural tube. Bamboo clothes are halfway between silk and cotton. 

You can eat it. 

Even in the raw form is a fantastic building and tool making material. 

Hemp and bamboo for everything. 

6 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

 

I don't want to embarrass amritdharis by joining their group. They deserve better than me.

I am already a huge embarrassment to the Sikh community (> 90% of the posters on sikhsangat have said so at one point or another). I don't want to make it worse by becoming an embarrassment to the amritdhari Sikh community.

I feel that. 

2 hours ago, Jai Tegang! said:

All fair points. But isn't this true of all ethno/religious groups? The vast majority of men of any religion are only observant in the orthodox sense if there is a heavy-handed religious authority that wields actual power over them. Left to their own choices, the number of "true followers" is never in majority. Maybe there are only a few hundred "true Sikhs"  if we apply more stringent  criteria, but where does that take us as a group? You can keep applying rules to prune down our numbers to no end. First it'll be kesadhari only. Then it can come down to only Amritdharis are Sikhs. Lets take it one more step and say only those Amritdharis who have weapons training and keep atleast 5 weapons at all times are Sikhs. Then we can jump into the spiritual realm and start pruning out those who don't get up early enough. Pretty soon the definition is going to end up at only a well trained brahmgyani khalsa is a Sikh. 

Amen bro. That's why the order of closeness, or innerness, not elevation, is Real Amritdhari at the core. Keshdharis, then Sehajdhari, then Mona, then family members and allies. 

Satguru Ji's system is perfect. We're just <banned word filter activated> it up with "collonial" systems. 

It's like a military or a gang's chain of command structure, combined with truly representative governance and meritocracy. It's what they wish they could be. 

5 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I agree bro. What @shastarSingh is feeling is true scientifically, is true from a world perspective. But we are a long time not living in Satyug where the world is united. Treta Yugh is in fact defined in part by the fact that at that time righteousness was at a national level. Then by Dwapar Yugh we have righteousness or empathy through identity at the family level. Now we are fully selfish. And so not for many Yughs could we get everyone to conserve their births. 

Even in Treta Yugh all nations might agree, but some so that the others would slow down, and they would betray the contract and continue the increase. 

and so here in Kalyug we must see to a birthrate that grows. And also convert and adopt. 

As we need many Khalsa for Khalsa Raj. 

Tldr in Kalyug, as weird as it might seem, we have a responsibility to try and keep pace or outbreed everyone else and also convert. Even if that presses us closer to inevitable crunches where we simply must take power to save the planet. 

Also. It's corruption, waste, greed and wealth disparity, and methods of farming etc that artifically make us hit the current population ceiling. 

This planet will one day be a garden oasis again,  heavily left to nature, augmented and stewarded by high technology. In a confluence of renewable. 

Individual houses will all be ecological and independently powered, and have their own utility systems. 

If we don't destroy the planet, and starve by the billions and die of thirst first. 

1 hour ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

Exactly. 100% correct.

The only people who want to see Sikhs die childless or unmarried and decline with lower than replacement TFR are non-Sikhs who despise Sikhs at the core (albeit that they might try and pretend to pass themselves off as Sikhs in order to more aggressively spread their poisonous anti-Sikh ideology).

Often these types will also try to promote a toxic casteist ideology at the same time as they cannot tolerate unity among Sikhs that the Ik Nagri Ik Gurdwara ideology is spreading with the target of only one united Gurdwara per pind (or locality in the West) within the next 5 years.

I agree bro. What @shastarSingh is feeling is true scientifically, is true from a world perspective. But we are a long time not living in Satyug where the world is united. Treta Yugh is in fact defined in part by the fact that at that time righteousness was at a national level. Then by Dwapar Yugh we have righteousness or empathy through identity at the family level. Now we are fully selfish. And so not for many Yughs could we get everyone to conserve their births. 

Even in Treta Yugh all nations might agree, but some so that the others would slow down, and they would betray the contract and continue the increase. 

and so here in Kalyug we must see to a birthrate that grows. And also convert and adopt. 

As we need many Khalsa for Khalsa Raj.