ChardikalaUK

On 4/9/2022 at 3:30 AM, SinghPunjabSingh said:

Brilliant insightful post. You are always 100% on point when it comes to understanding the Slavemaster religions.

The other aspect is that the Muslims often marry between the ages of 18-20 or certainly by age 21.

In contrast Sikhs are often getting married by around age 40 in some cases nowadays or not marrying.

So the Muslims are getting 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = 81 descendants hypothetically in a 100 years (at a marriage age of 25 for example) = 81 descendants over a 100 years to allocate towards building their grooming and Halal empires.

In contrast let's be generous and says Sikhs are managing 2 x 2 x 2  descendants in 100 years (33years marriage age) = 8 descendants from 8 great grandparents. So the Muslim Slavemaster ideology to outbreed Kaffirs in order to make them a powerless minority is very devious, successful and highly dangerous to humanity indeed!

Thanks Paji.

Look at Kerela in India, demographics are changing very fast there. At the beginning of the 20th century Hindus were 70% of the population and now they're just 56%. Muslims are 26% of the population but account for 41% of all births today. It is on target to be a muslim majority state in the future. This is the state that has the highest literacy rate in India but even that hasn't stopped muslim overbreeding.

If they don't outbreed you, they throw you out when they become a majority like in Kashmir.

Here in the UK the fertility rate for muslim women is 3 whereas for non muslims it is 1.8. 

Even Colonel Gaddaffi said that Europe will become muslim not through war but through the womb.

The worrying thing is the overbreeding doesn't stop even when they get educated and have good jobs. Most of the suls I work with in IT have 3 kids. Most Sikhs have 2. At this rate a Sikh man would have 4 grandchildren and a sul 9. That's how quickly demographics change.

In a lowly populated state like Punjab this is very dangerous.

The westerners are such pushovers to allow this.

2 hours ago, Saba said:

We are all children of the same Lord no matter what colour, land or religion we profess to live by. 
 

Yes but people take advantage of our generosity, it can't all be one way traffic.

Are there any examples of Islamic charities helping needy Sikhs? Nope! So why are we he'll bent on helping them. Likewise with Hindus.

31 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

@proudkaur21 @dallysingh101

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cb0DQ8xgJ5J/

Happy Sikh Heritage Month to Canada from your's truly Gurdeep! 

They're dancing like they just 5hat themselves. What a bunch of jokers we've become.

Indian origin faiths don't have the cunningness, hatred and aggression to deal with Abrahamic faith's especially Islam.

Malaysia and Indonesia were once Hindu/Buddhists and now they are overwhelmingly Muslim. Islam wants to conquer, they see secularism as a weakness to expose and when Muslims become a majority they impose sharia which forbids the populace from leaving Islam. So it's a one way win win situation for them. You can never have a Liberal attitude towards them or it will come back to bite you.

1 hour ago, californiasardar1 said:

 

Some problems with Sikhs:

1) We live in the past. Do Pakistanis get all nostalgic and obsessive about Amritsar and Jalandhar?

2) We put being Punjabi ahead of being Sikh. Punjabi Muslims are Muslim first, Pakistani second, Punjabi third. Punjabi Hindus are Hindu first, Indian second, Punjabi third. Sikhs are Punjabi first.

I was going to make your first point in my previous post. Lahore, Lyallpur etc mean diddly squat to me. I don't want to visit them nor do I care about what happens there. One of my grandfathers was even born on that side, he went back to visit his village once and that was it, he wasn't obsessed about it like some pathetic apne are.

We are obsessed with Punjab and Punjabiat because we have no country of our own.

I've seen your thread about Shaadi.com, I remember in my single days I went to one of their speed dating events and one girl said as long as her partner is Punjabi she would be happy, whether he was Sikh or Hindu. 

6 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

It is what it is. Gotta move on.

Well said, and I hope Punjabi singers and actors end this obsession with Lahore too.

That's all well and good but as I've said many times, in the modern age Demographics matter. If Sikhs+Hindus formed more than 50% of the population of Lahore then it would have gone to India but they didn't so that's that. Even in Amritsar Sikh + Hindus barely had a majority over muslims.

Furthermore in Pre Partition there were more muslims in East Punjab than there were Sikhs and Hindus in West Punjab. More of them had to migrate than we did.

I don't get this obsession with Lahore.

I'll say it again - Partition was brutal but in the long run it was good for us. I rate Jinnah for having the foresight in seeing that Muslims and non Muslims won't get along and that's been proven again and again.

9 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Hitman bro. That whole job's paid for. Including local papers and officials. That was lic to kill. 

You've been watching too many Bourne films.

1 hour ago, BhForce said:

Bro, what % are the Sunnis of Bahrain? The population is Shia.

Secondly, there's nothing to say that the Mullahs would have had the same power without state support.

The Punjabis who became Muslims by force could have been told you don't have to follow the Mullahs anymore. Just reverting to folk religions would have been fine.

Sunni vs Shia is very different to muslim vs non muslim. With all of the Islamic terrorism these days there is no doubt that an undivided Punjab would be a bloodbath.

We just needed a land where we were the overwhelming majority. It makes me laugh when apne think the break up of the greater East Punjab which included Haryana and parts of Himachal was a bad thing. It finally gave us a state where we were the majority, made Punjabi and Gurmukhi the official language. Even then we've messed that up and are now barely a majority. We aren't even a majority in the major cities of Punjab. Amritsar, Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Patiala all have more Hindus than Sikhs, I find that a joke!

I would hate to live in a sul majority greater Punjab with curly writing everywhere.

Demographics matter.

2 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

 

Nope infact i think the best thing that happened was Muslims staying in India because hindus would have backstabbed us anyways whether muslims stayed or not but now with 230+ million muslims and the religious rift increasing day by day in India there can be a perfect opportunity for sikhs to gain something from all this when chaos breaks out if only apne use their brain. Look if Muslims weren't there in India i think these Hindus would have done much worse stuff to us. Right now there are sikhs and muslims in the way of making their hindu rasthra. And i dont think they will succeed in doing so without some civil unrest breaking out. Muslims are being hated right now like sikhs were around 1984.

If its such a good idea having the muslims in India why did we eliminate them from Punjab? They are now coming to Punjab in large numbers, mosques are opening everywhere. Open your eyes.

Sorry but I have zero sympathy for these women. They actively seek out western men. At least women from India aren't like that. 

The Hindus really messed up big time in 1947. That was their time to remove all Muslims from India (like we did in Punjab) and claim their Ram temple in Ayodhya but they and their leaders bottled it big time. It is because of their failings that muslims from UP and Bihar have come to Punjab.

The Badal's, KPS Gill, Zail Singh were all Keshdhari Sikhs and turned out to be the biggest traitors to the kaum.

I've seen a huge increase in guns being present in Punjabi music videos. We're on a downwards spiral 

Its our own fault for not developing our original homeland. We just run to white countries.