Jump to content

dallysingh101

Members
  • Content Count

    4,704
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    67

dallysingh101 last won the day on July 7 2020

dallysingh101 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,857 Excellent

2 Followers

About dallysingh101

  • Rank
    Ajai Su Rabh Naa BohaRiou Daykh Banday Kai Bhaag

Recent Profile Visitors

5,469 profile views
  1. Too many apnay are mental! They'll stab another Sikh in the back or treat him/her like second rate shyte over jaat-paat, but give their jindh-jaan to gairSikh organisations?? Ones that clearly have a dubious history with the panth too? How retarded is that? https://www.sikhawareness.com/topic/18952-falcon-rw-captain-4th-sikh-infantry-punjab-frontier-force-handbook-on-sikhs-for-the-use-of-regimental-officers-printed-at-the-pioneer-press-allahabad-india-1896/ Tell me if the link isn't working, and we'll find another source. This is interesting reading (if read with a probing, independent, intelligent eye). It shows you just how closely the angreejees studied Panjab and apnay to manipulate them for their own agenda. Written about 4/5 decades after the dubious 'annexation' of the Sikh kingdom.
  2. I'm just outright flabbergasted at just how slow and retarded many apnay are in political terms when it come to angreezjees. It's infantile and so cringe!! These people have seen certain sections of the panth as dimwitted for a while now. It's time certain people put their vanities and pride aside and really comprehend how they are perceived and how this effects how we are treated (or mugged off as they say in London). All the boll0cks of promoting contributions in the 'world wars' (which were really just a kick off with Germans), just help make us look more slow and subordinate. Anyway here's what they thought of certain apna, as recorded in a manual used by anglos to recruit into their colonial army (there's more comments about being 'docile' elsewhere in the manual). The quote is a hundred and 20 odd years old, but I still think that characterisation is the one many english people have in their heads. I think they perceive certain people as slow and lulloo. That's why they do so much to us, without a second thought, they think we are too slow, docile and dumb to even clock it, let alone react. And it goes on to this day, with the way they have essentially covered up decades of grooming of Sikh girls, whilst acknowledging this happens to white girls. Certain apnay need to wake the f**k up, and stop promoting narratives that perpetuate the docile, loyal Sikh sepoy characterisation. Change is due and coming. And it might not be smooth.
  3. Even some 'high hanging fruit' can act s1uttish given the right circumstances. Argument/discord with husband. Getting back at him. Feeling 'misunderstood' (that's a common one with women......), feeling lonely. The excitement of 'exotic' forbidden fruit etc. etc. But I do believe what you wrote above is pretty central to much of the 5laggy behaviour you see out there.
  4. dallysingh101

    Cancer

    Sorry for your situation. I'm going to suggest something now that I know will be controversial: but if options are being exhausted, you might want to look into Rick Simpson oil. It's a cannabis derived compound. I know that it doesn't work for everyone, but it does seem to have worked for some people. So it's no miracle cure but an option in a tight situation.
  5. I think they'll try all the covert stuff before they try an outright open attack like in 84. It'll be the perceived leaders that are targeted. Apnay need to wake up too. I spoke to a mixed race relative to get another, more subjective perspective on the protests - he said it outright: Globally with covid and the economic implications, no one would give a crap if the police out there went genocidal. Not that anyone ever gave a toss even in the past. Our lot need to wake up to this reality. Whatever is happening - we are in it on our own. All the years of protesting about 84 to the UN and various foreign governments (especially the UK) didn't help us. We got to get that in our head. Boris didn't know this was going on based on his confused response to Dhesi's question in Parliament.
  6. I think a lot of women also seem to have innate narcissistic tendencies. It might be that like is attracted to like? But that aside: I've met a good few guys who've been sleeping around with hordes of women over decades. And it isn't what you might imagine. Some of them are butt ugly, broke and not exactly in tip top shape. A lot of it seems down to talking abilities and projecting confidence. Also, knowing when a women is 'horny'. I think their sociopathy helps them hone onto what the women want - and then dump them with no second thought and move onto the next. The women are so dumb (or horny?), that after a few years they come back for more! lol
  7. From what I've seen, there are loads of guys like this. They usually have strong narcissistic personalities.
  8. Just for the the record, there was another dog in this group who came from amongst us too. Forgot his name, but he remained a mona.
  9. How did Ganda Singh make a mistake? He just clarified the issue. It may have been people who misunderstood Sainapati's text who've confused the issue. He's shaheedi was in Chitaur - not Chamkaur. As Guru and the Singhs kept moving South through different villages, the Jatha arrived at the town of Chitaur. This town had a very big and magnificent fort, which was built by the Rajpoots but was now occupied by some Mughal soldiers. You can read the contemporary account of his shaheedi in text 7 here: https://www.vidhia.com/Historical%2C Political%2C Philosophical and Informational/Sikh_History_From_Persian_Sources_-_JS_Grewal_Irfan_Habib.pdf It hasn't just been discovered now. People have known about it for a long time. If anything, there may have been some casteist conspiracy to occlude this figure from Sikh history.
  10. You can read a translation of the contemporary Persian account this adopted son of Guru ji's shaheedi whilst attempting to storm a fort in Habib and Grewal's Persian Sources of Sikh History.
  11. Here's Ganda Singh's footnote from Gursobha. Translations mine (an old one): On pg 33 it says: ਅਸਲ ਵਿਚ ਜਿਸ ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਾ ਜ਼ਿਕਰ ਸੈਨਾਪਤਿ ਨੇ ਚਮਕੌਰ ਦੇ ਜੁਧ ਵਿਚ ਕਰਦੇ ਹੋਏ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਵੈਰੀ ਦੇ ਕਟਕ ਨੂੰ ਮਾਰਦਾ ਕੱਟਦਾ ਮੈਦਾਨ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਪਾਰ ਨਿਕਲ ਗਿਆ, ਉਹ ਸਾਹਿਬਜ਼ਾਦਾ ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਨਹੀਂ ਸੀ। ਉਹ ਇਕ ਹੋਰ ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੋ ਬਸੀ ਪਠਾਣਾ ਦੇ ਭਾਈ ਨਥੂ (ਨਥੀਆ) ਤਰਖਾਣ ਦਾ ਪੁੱਤਰ ਸੀ। ਇਸ ਦੀ ਮਾਂ ਭਿੱਖੀ ਮਾਤਾ ਜੀਤੋ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਸੇਵਾ ਵਿਚ ਆਨੰਦਪੁਰ ਰਹਿੰਦੀ ਸੀ। ਉਸ ਨੇ ਊਸ ਨੂੰ ਗੁਰ ਚਰਨਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਭੇਟ ਕੀਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਉਥੇ ਹੀ ਪਲਿਆ ਅਤੇ ਵੱਡਾ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ। ਇਹ ਸਾਹਿਬਜ਼ਾਦਾ ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਾ ਹਾਣੀ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਇਕ ਵਾਰੀ ਇਸ ਨੇ ਸਾਹਿਬਜ਼ਾਦਾ ਨੂੰ ਘੁਲਣ ਵਿਚ ਢਾ ਲਿਆ ਸੀ, ਜਿਸ ਪੁਰ ਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਫੁਰਮਾਇਆ ਸੀ ਇਹ ਭੀ ਮੇਰਾ ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਹੀ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਦੂਜਾ ਜ਼ੋਰਾਵਾਰ ਕਰਕੇ ਪਰਸਿੱਧ ਹੋ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ। ਇਹ ਹੀ ਕਾਰਣ ਭੁਲੇਕੇ ਦਾ ਹੈ। In reality, the Zorawar Singh mentioned by Sainapati in his account of the Chamkaur battle as hacking and killing his way through the enemy cordon through to escape to the other side, was not the Sahibzada Zorawar Singh [i.e. Guru Gobind’s biological son]. He was another Zorawar Singh, who was the son of a carpenter named Bhai Nathu (Natheea) of Bassi Pathana. His mother used to reside in Anandpur in the service of the charitable Mata Jeeto [Guru ji’s mother?]. She offered him to the feet of the Guru and he was raised and grew up there [in Anandpur]. He was the same age as Sahibzada Zorowar Singh and once knocked him down in a wrestling match, upon which Guru ji declared that ‘He is also my Zorawar Singh’, and he became well known as the other Zorawar. This is the reason for the mistake. This link has some video katha about Zorowar Singh Paalit: https://www.sikhawareness.com/topic/14984-dasam-patshah-de-paalit-puttar/?tab=comments#comment-129981
  12. Hiya. It'd be nice if you could tell us where we might be able to get hold of the English translations of Umdat-Ut-Tawarikh.
  13. I should add: I've noticed that 'The Independent' newspaper routinely and (maybe not so?) subtly engages in obfuscation of the pak-pedo-grooming issue by muddying the water like they have in the above link. They seem to be pushing some agenda to shift focus away from the issue by making out as if it is a minor one in the wider issue of pedophilia in the UK. Or trying to downplay the matter by suggesting that 'extremists' are likely to exploit it - which is false - it's not addressing it that will cause serious issues.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use