proudkaur21

17 hours ago, Kau89r8 said:

@proudkaur21

This is what happens when they are majority.

14 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Lowkey We can make Canada into our own land. But yes I understand what you are saying. I’m implying that US, Canada, Australia aren’t blatantly pro Islam and anti Sikh like the UK is

 

also the Islamification of Western Europe is disgusting 

Will the higher up elites want sikhs to have power in canada? Do you think so?

5 minutes ago, Jassu said:

We kind of had to run away from our land. I think Sikhs overseas are actually more in tune with Sikhi than Sikhs in india at this point. A lot of pro Sikhi thoughts and sovereignty sentiment among overseas Sikhs. If all Sikhs stayed in Punjab, there’s literally no guarantee we would’ve turned out any different than current Sikhs in Punjab. Your argument would be really good if Sikhs in india were actually something to admire lmao

Sikhs everywhere have forsaken their gurus. And now we have just been reduced to almost slaves.

12 minutes ago, Jassu said:

So what did we as Sikhs do to deserve this karma. We didn’t colonise anybody. We can’t even colonise ourselves. Yet we’re going to be erased from history books due to our own choices and insidious combined efforts of other 

Sikhs as a panth have completely forsaken our gurus. I mean just look at the pious anand Karaj ceremony and what has it been turned into. Majority of sikhs cut their hair. We have completely fallen off the path. 99% of the sikhs go against the hukams of the guru. Majority sikhs partake in beadbi and rather than accepting their mistake try to change the hukams. Majority sikhs don't even believe in the concept of soverignity as espoused by our gurus. So we have turned into slaves. Even guru ji said that rehat pyaari mujhko sikh pyara nahi. Like I said we do so much beadbi of our gurus. 

1 minute ago, Jassu said:

Also I doubt whites actually wanted Muslims into their lands. It’s happened tho due to leaders and now Muslims are ironically making ‘white lands’ into Iraq 2.0.

Why should we care about their lands lol they did pretty bad things too. It's their own karam. We are also facing our own karam too. Leaving our land and running away then crying why we are loosing our homeland. It is what it is.

1 minute ago, Jassu said:

Lowkey We can make Canada into our own land. But yes I understand what you are saying. I’m implying that US, Canada, Australia aren’t blatantly pro Islam and anti Sikh like the UK is

 

also the Islamification of Western Europe is disgusting 

They colonized Americas and destroyed native Americans. Now europe will be Islamic I guess. The cycle of life.

5 minutes ago, Jassu said:

I think the future of western europe and UK is extremely bleak. I’m considering moving to North America or Australia tbh

What will happen when whites dont want us there anymore? Why dont we think about our land?

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I think that's too simplistic an assessment.

With the kind of administration (in terms of ideology) currently leading India, an intelligent and farsighted Sikh leadership would've made it a priority to get as much done in our favour by playing the game by further isolating the globalist-aligned Congressis. We acknowledge the growing Muslim problem in Punjab, and we should've worked with the faction that also wants a solution to it. Then, depending on circumstances, we back off and see where the water flows, and push forward our specific interests that DON'T align with the big Hindu monolith. That's how smart leadership works, not shouting jakare at random intervals.

Because as I've said previously, if Congress is a no-go (which I agree with) and BJP is off limits, the how the frig is anything going to get done? What's our leverage and bargaining power where we have so much ego and pride?

There are only certain types of sikhs who can get power in that system. Like I said the people at the top decide what happens. Why do you think the gurus advocated for soverignity. I know how you are talking about how India is becoming great . Like I said give it a few years and and everything will be out in the open. 99% of these deshbhakts will run away from the country given the choice. Like I said give it a few years the bhaande of the entire country will be out in the open .

Since 1947 there has been systematic blurring of lines between hindus and sikhs for assimilation  because as we know Hindus literally believe in anything and worship anything so when sikhs marry them it is in fact a huge loss for sikhs and not much for them. This constant sikhs and hindus are same blah blah is what let to this high out marriage rate. It's our own fault for not teaching the importance of sikhi to kids since they are young. 99% of kids born from such marriages will never be khalsa ever which is why these lines have been systematically blurred. If you cant kill them through genocide completely just assimilate them slowly.

I'm pretty sure their kind are on this board too keeping an eye on us. For some reason they are obsessed with us and cant let us do our own thing. They always have to insert themselves into everything we do. Karma works in mysterious ways. Been causing troubles for Sikhs since 1947 through treachery dont forget that there are 250 million Muslims on your land now. They say God works in mysterious ways.

1 minute ago, Jassu said:

Literally the main reason why Khalistan is a stagnant idea and underground to the point of obscurity is because fellow Sikhs don’t want it. Pathetic

They have become used to slavery and think they dont deserve anything better. They have been devoid of their history and more interested in watching shitty bollywood movies.

Just now, Jassu said:

I think Sikhs themselves don’t want Sikh sovereignty and Sikhi to prosper. Look at some of our fellow Sikhs. What a joke. Do you think Muslims or Hindus think or speak like how some of our ‘Sikhs’ do? So many Sikhs willing to bring us down in order to uplift others.

like i said years of Hindu colonization and brainwashing through media. Colonization is not only when it's white skinned dudes whipping you and calling you black dog. Sikhs were very happy about the function at Red fort yesterday but like I said our people are not clever like jews just rabid fools who cannot think long term or see through the chaalein of these other groups. They wasted sangat's money on such display whereas we are struggling as a panth economically. Every single Sikh leader in Hindu India is a sell out and coward. But its okay if they want to live under ram rajya it's their choice.

8 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

You could say the only reason India is secular is because it is a majority Hindu.

Once it becomes non Hindu, secularism gets thrown away.

This type of system happens in a democracy, where there vote bank and numbers count.

What could happen to save India from Islamisation is to throw away the democratic structure and enforce a more autocratic system where vote bank politics and breeding become irrelevant. 

 

It is not secular because of Hindus lolll. They are just weak and can only attack in groups like cowards. Look now that they found they have a ruling party who is anti muslim and has given them hopes of hindu rashtra their nature is out on full display without any fear. Who said islamisation was better?

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Is it a cross-party, apolitical policy that transcends partisan lines, i.e. something that remains in place no matter who is voted in? 

Yes. They all hate the idea of Sikh sovereignty and Sikhi prospering.

1 minute ago, MisterrSingh said:

That's exactly the problem that will face our own potential land if secular sants like Ravi Singh ever involve themselves in issues of Sikh self-determination! This is why I raised the subject. Do you think they just happen to insert themselves into these influential positions by luck? The "payoff" comes decades later once they've established themselves decades earlier. It's not accidental. 

We have almost 900 years of recorded brutal history of Islamic invasions. Myanmar did the most based thing by kicking them out. They were being targeted everywhere by libtards but said its best to contain the rabid dog now. Libtards be like Buddha didn't teach this blah blah . The monks said f you, no thanks. Can our libtards learn something from them?

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Amusing to hear this when there's upcoming non-Congress Indian intellectuals who are arguing the same about their own Hindu temples not being free.

There's apparently certain laws embedded in Indian legislation that prioritise secularism at the expense of the integrity and autonomy of Hindu religious practices, i.e. the immediate surrounding land on which Hindu temples are built in India isn't owned by the outfit that runs the day-to-day matters of the temple. That's why you get Muslims able to buy beef processing factories on that same land in order to pi55 off these Hindus. And we all know that in a country where secularism is publicly espoused while being home to millions of a specific sand-dwelling religion and its followers, secularism will lead to Islamisation if left unchecked. Eventually, that beef factory will become a mosque. That's the plan.

Open your eyes to the nuance. Don't get your ideas on India and politics from uncles sipping on tea, sharing conspiracy theories from the 80s and 90s in the gurdwara langar hall.

Okay so you are saying Indian agencies dont spy on us Sikhs in different countries? And you are making the same mistake of Indian Sikhs who think they are free.

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Secularism in India does not mean the same thing that we know it as the west

There is a reason in India Secular is called Sickular. 

In the west, Secularism means separation of religion and state. In India it means separation of Hindu and state.

The Indian secularists are the dhimmis. 

 

What sickularism are you talking about? That hindu guy mowed down 5 farmers and he is still not in jail. That sadhvi pragya thakur had hands in causing bomb blast and even accepted it and she is not in jail. Hindus can cause riots and are not put in jail. Are you saying the secularism in India is enjoyed by Muslims only? Maybe it was in the start under that nehru and all but this entire country's system has always been anti sikh from the start.

9 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

How would you get rid of people who refuse to go? 

This is actually a pertinent question in europe, because if things do get more right wing, some people  might face a similar circumstance in future. 

Plus it's not like intimidating people into leaving wasn't tried in the UK just a few decades ago. I saw it with my own eyes. 

They should have just not let Muslims enter. Now they are done for. Same mistake low iq Sikh liberals have been making. I guess western euors didn't have a taste of Islam yet unlike Southern Euros. They are dying to see what it feels like to live under sharia so let it be. We should worry about our own land.

On 4/18/2022 at 6:35 PM, SinghPunjabSingh said:

2. Most mixed race people are overwhelmingly not racist and understand from their own parentage as to why racism is an artificial man-made construct.

 

 

 

This is not true. Alot of half white mixed people are highly racist and think they are better than their poc half even though they might seem to be all about poc rights and what not.

16 hours ago, Jassu said:

@SinghPunjabSingh

I don’t care about kaleh goreh or whatever. I really doubt this website even gets traffic from black dudes trying to join Sikhi. Like I mentioned before that kalleh usually join Islam. This website gets traffic from OTHER SIKHS for and foremost and not the liberal types. If they saw what you’re saying they’d be disappointed by the fate of our quom. Literally you’re embarrassing Sikhs. It seems you’re willing to write entire novels and essays for people who don’t give a sh!t about us. I guess this is all sikhi is good for now. Putting our people down and uplifting others lmao.

And yes I liked the white dude bc he was interested in Sikhi and joining Sikhi. I was seeking advice you seem hypocritical 

They will join Islam despite knowing how the Arabs praise their prophet for having white skin lol. You can find hadith quotes about this. So its okay to join such a religion but then us Sikhs are bad and racist so we get attacked by them. Okay!

17 hours ago, Jassu said:

@SinghPunjabSingh

I don’t care about kaleh goreh or whatever. I really doubt this website even gets traffic from black dudes trying to join Sikhi. Like I mentioned before that kalleh usually join Islam. This website gets traffic from OTHER SIKHS for and foremost and not the liberal types. If they saw what you’re saying they’d be disappointed by the fate of our quom. Literally you’re embarrassing Sikhs. It seems you’re willing to write entire novels and essays for people who don’t give a sh!t about us. I guess this is all sikhi is good for now. Putting our people down and uplifting others lmao.

And yes I liked the white dude bc he was interested in Sikhi and joining Sikhi. I was seeking advice you seem hypocritical 

jassu i agree with you. I don't agree with hating anyone without a reason but why should we all feel the most sympathy for one particular group when many groups in history have suffered much worse. Like if you see what the communist did in eastern europe and then muslims in south asia, the balkan regions of Europe and then these christians all over the world. Many groups have suffered. I dont like when people impose the slavery dynamics of the USA to the entire world and then we have to act like they are the most subjugated people and have sympathy for them always so even if we are the victim in some cases we have to not speak because they are most subjugated group. I dont understand this thinking? Like as if there is some victim competition.

Also we Sikhs died but did not give up our religion whereas the subjugated black people in Africa are now Christian and constantly trying to convert us even. Now is it our fault that they accepted their enemies religion? They know their history and still follow the religion so now its on them. You cant always make a group be a victim always.

They also marry whites in record numbers. I dont like how we are told that we hold white supremacist views when they are the ones who marry mingle and follow the culture of white people the most.  We hold all groups accountable here be it white black or even our own who suffer from self hate and constantly worship whites. So why is it wrong to point out that alot of black people also suffer from white supremacist views and self hate?

1 hour ago, Kau89r8 said:

Badals right..? To be more specific 

Yes and No...because they'd been caught in Germany years ago spying on Sikhs and arrested ....also most Gurudwaras have pics of Sant Ji and Shaeedes and years ago they'd come with their news channels and be like 'omg Khalistani in UK Gurudwaras' but they stopped because they know they have no control over Sikhs in the West and their views..however i know in Canada yrs ago they put pic of  pammer and others who were under terrorists in Canada and that caught alot of heat ..this is down to mostly lack of intellects leadership in our panth...we need Deep Sidhu intellects leadership

But if they get caught spying then you can take legal action 

These countries trade with India. I dont know if they would collude with the Indian govt against us. Like can we guarantee it would not happen? Just see jaggi. I dont trust anyone anymore. Money makes the world go round.