Jump to content

proactive

Members
  • Posts

    2,688
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    66

Posts posted by proactive

  1. The funny thing is that not only the Badals, Captain, Congress and BJP lose the election, they must have given out crores of cash to people to bribe them to vote for them. Many people took the money and still voted for AAP.  The only party that didn't give out cash or bribes was Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar), so the 385,000 people who voted for that party can hold their heads up high. 

  2. 15 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

    Majithia never stands from amritsar. He stood from Amritsar and made his wife stand from majithia area.

    Captain also used his links in Amritsar to lower down sidhu's vote percentage.

    There is always a factor of sabotaging in elections in India. Parties will pay people who have the same names as their opponents to stand as independents so that some of the confused supporters of the opposing party will vote for the independent in error. If a former MLA who was useless does not get selected to stand by his party and someone else nominated then that person will get his supporters to vote against his own party to prevent the election of the new candidate.

    The way the wave for change was, it is a moot point whether Captain or Majithia's political games had much affect on Navjot Sidhu's loss. 

  3. 9 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:

     

    Are you aware that at the time of the partition, Sikhs did not form a majority in any geographic region of a substantial size?

    Sikhs were a majority in two tehsils under British administration: Moga and Tarn Taran. That's it.

    Additionally, Sikhs were a majority in the tiny princely state of Faridkot.

    The problem in 1947 was that there was a labour government in Britain at that time which had no respect for property rights, had Churchill been returned to power in 1945, the chances are that Sikh property ownership which was 27% of Punjab would have got us a partition line further west than it finally ended up. 

    The UN gave over 55% of Palestine to the Jews in 1948 even though they only owned 7% of the land, these land allocation were based on the theory that the land should go to those who could develop it. 

  4. 1 minute ago, shastarSingh said:

    Veer bjp won in UP.

    Did western UP jaats vote for bjp?

    Very sad if they did....

    It is difficult to dislodge the BJP once they get their claws into any state. It doesn't matter if some UP Jaats voted for BJP or not, people vote for any number of reasons, and anyway the UP Jaats are very small population compared to the rest of UP and they can only affect a few seats.

  5. 4 minutes ago, BhForce said:

    What are you talking about? The Russian army is fighting and killing Ukrainian soldiers, not every civilian they can get their hands on.

    The invasion of Ukraine by Russia is not like the invasion of parts of America by English/colonists. The goal is not to genocide /move the population and then take over the land. 

    Putin's goal is to force Ukraine not to join NATO.

    Of course, that's not my goal, because I'm not the President of Russia.

    The sheeple are falling for the propaganda that Putin is the bad guy and Zelensky is the good guy. The fact is both sides are being stubborn. Putin should not have gone in and by going in he has played into Zelensky's hands. Putin has been the master manipulator for the last 20 years. He managed to save his client Asad in Syria against both the concerted efforts of the west and ISIS, he managed to gain Crimea and kept the Donbass out of Ukrainian hands. He should have bided his time, taken out the comedian Salisbury style. By going in, he has to either take over Ukraine and risk a Vietnam type situation or take control of only the Russian majority areas but then the west will still keep the sanctions in place. The Ukrainians sense that they have the upper hand by their use of clever propaganda and even the Ukrainian negotiator was interviewed and she said that Ukraine wants complete capitulation of Russia! 

    The best Putin can hope for is that the west and Ukraine agree to a referendum in the Russian majority areas if they want to join Russia, he has lost the game to prevent Ukraine not joining NATO, even nations that were neutral like Sweden are now clamouring to join NATO. 

  6. 1 minute ago, dallysingh101 said:

    UK is facing bigger economic shock than 1973 oil crisis that could leave families £1,750 worse off as energy prices soar and ban on Russian imports is set to pile on more pressure

    • An economic shock worse than the 1973 oil crisis could hit Britain this summer as fuel prices march upwards
    • Rocketing inflation and rising oil prices could hit Britons in their pockets as food prices also rise fast
    • Tory MPs have warned over the Government's policy response to the crisis, amid fears inflation could hit 8

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10595965/UK-facing-bigger-economic-shock-1973-oil-crisis-MPs-warn.html

    The DM is well known for being pure click bait, the recent hospital attack their headline was that 3000 babies were under the rubble! They changes it after even the comments from their readers started to question it. Now it look like a few people were killed. All media is pretty much propaganda nowadays. If it does come about that we are in for an economic shock then it will have been self inflicted. BS green levies on energy bills, trying to gain brownie points with the climate change lobby by going net zero. Building cycle lanes for lyra clad goons while car users are victimised and used as a cash cow. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use