Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About akhandeurope

  • Rank
    Amrit Peeaa Satgur Deeaa || Avar Naa Jaanaa Dooaa Theeaa ||
  1. Dear Consc - Normally Gursikhs who believe in raag mala do so because a human (gursikh/sant) told them to rather then doing real research. We know what is bani or not but I'm afriad I really disagree with anyone who prints/writes a saroop without rag mala. You may think why if this isn't gurbani? The fact is the panth has issued clear hukum - you don't have to read rag mala (akal takth didn't read it in early days until someone decided to change marada without consulting panth) but noone should dare print/write a saroop without rag mala beacuse this issue is unsolved. Bhai Sahib Randhir Singh
  2. Is this another one of n30s indirect insults at akj which sikhsangat claimed was against it's policy? One shouldn't be so venemous at heart even if they become better at hiding it over the years. Anyway on this topic - Sant Gurbachan Singh of DDT didn't have typical hindu influenced views on sikhi like other sampradaee gyanis. So if some taksalis prefer to take gurmat stance in footsteps of Sant Gurbachan Singh it's unfair to label them new age taksalis and then blame other groups for correct gurmat vichaar when it hurts your heavily vedantic, many paths are good, all lead to waheguru, non g
  3. The main point is to those who call themselves "taksali" but choose to disrespect bhai sahib, then please read these bachans by Sant Gurbachan Singh and realise your mistake and refrain from making the same mistake in future.
  4. This seems to be a response from an over zelous mod whos had a bad day, or a typical anti akj response. Either I didn't learn the rules of English language correctly, or English isn't your first language. I think I should clear this up for you and the online members, so don't think I'm trying to take the mick. If someone is rightly upset at the actions of a few in the akj and call them some foolish akj people, that is not an attack on akj, just complaining about a few whos actions are against gurmat but decide to call themselves "akj". Same way saying nowadays there are some foolish "people"
  5. But some foolish say Sant ji was pooran brahmgyani but then go against his writings. Calling someone brhamgyani then going against their views, bachans is mere words in the ends. Even though bhai sahib hasn't specifically praised Sant Gurbachan Singh in his wiritings akj singhs still show respect to Sant ji, because gursikhs know its unwise to show disrespect to any highly kmayee wala gursikh of any jatha. Sant ji was very strong in his veiws on things like rag mala but still chose to praise bhai sahib so highly!? This shows Bhai Sahib Randhir Singh was truly someone really special with alot
  6. No need to ask anyone about krishan. Read gyaan khand pauri of japji sahib and you'll see clearly that krishna and the countless other krishnas reside in gyaan khand. Another point, krishna has been praised and downright condemened and insulted showing that krishna must have been a powerful being with avastha, but certainly not anywhere near pooran avastha or highest destinaton of sachkhand.
  7. You cannot use gurbani to prove importance of sarbloh just as you cannot use gurbani to prove importance of 5 kakaars. Yes bibek in gurbani is really about bibek budhi, although dietry bibek is one aspect of total bibek. However gurbani does give clues to not eat from non devotess (non gursikhs) look into updesh from gurbani on gurmantar heenus individuals (those without gurmantar).
  8. About not knowing about Mani Singh's earlier life, I don't know anything about childhood but in early days he was in the akhand kirtani jatha known as Resham Singh. Then at some point bhai sahib believed he needed to go down the path of doing parchaar in UK. He was a very strict sarbloh bebeki and I believe he kept this rehit strictly even after changing himself to Sant Mani Singh. We should try and learn guns from gursikhs. This gursikh seemed to have love and compassion and certainly did his naam/bani.
  9. akhandeurope


    Mut pulo rai, that's the point I'm trying to make that even though there are all these differences still all apart from you and your particular sangat believe guru sahib gave charan amrit. Amrit through shabad? this is inner avastha, why don't some realise that there is outer sikhi and inner sikhi, both are required. By the way to get shabad one first has to become a sikh of the saadhguru, through initiation. There is physical amrit to drink which enters you into sikhi, there's also inner amrit. There is also amrit pervading everywhere. Who knows how many levels and countless gifts there ther
  10. akhandeurope


    This is blatent ninda to say Guru ji didn't give charan pahul. It doesn't need to be mentioned in gurbani, because gurbani is mainly focused on internal and uniting jeev with akal. You've obviously been brainwashed, I figured out which group and person you follow, and you confirmed this by PM. I think it's only fair that I leave it upto you if you wish to share this with the rest of cyber sangat. Look at akj and other sampradas, so many differences, but they all - these jathas, taksaals, smarada ALL believe guru sahib gave charan pahul, only one easily brainwashed would believe otherwise if t
  11. Mat pulo rai, I think you're greatly mistaken if you think that shabadh you quoted shows your avastha. Just merely tasting sweetness in your tounge isn't gurmat russ. The real har amrit russ is when a gurmukh constantly drinks in it and this amrit flows throughout the body. This only comes with aathpehar abhiyaas. With each breath absorbed in automatic simran the amrit flows and the russ increases as avastha goes up. When one truly gets russ, all other pleasures of maya, whether it's food, tv, sleep etc seem very lowly in comparison to anand of amrit. Anyways if you're doing 3.5 hours simran
  12. haha...the sardar filming the video handed the situation perfectly with just the right amount of patronising to put this racist gori in her place. The singh filming should be awarded a siropa by the panth. Dhan sikhi!
  13. I am a worm compared to gursikhs like Sant Jagjit Singh. The main thing in gurmat is to do naam/bani kmayee, so you could say Sant Jagjit Singh is living in the gurmat way, as he does his bhagti. However if you read my post again you will see that I meant his "views" or "vichaar" and others like him are not inline with gurmat and I showed just one particular point on this. However if I did upset anyone then I am sorry.
  14. My brother N30S1ngh, Sant Jagjit Singh vichaar are very far from gurmat, like many other sants. If I could do sangat with Sant ji I would consider myself vadbhagi and enjoy my time doing paath with him etc I've heard he does good amout of kmayee and has good personal qualities. However I would have to ignore his main views like you should do so also. Typical chelas will rather believe their sants over gurbani causing them to become beymukh. I read a trasncript of a q and a with sant ji and there are many things I didn't agree on. Now the thing is you and I can provide many tuks and intrepret
  15. It is best to read Bhai Randhir Singh's small book "sachkhand darshan" which talks about all 5 khands with proof from gurbani. Those in lower spirtuality make wrong statments like sachkhand is also on this earth. Imagine if akal purkah was like a sun. The light rays (prakaash) of sun goes to all planets in the solar system and these rays travel several millions of miles. But the physical sun is still millions of miles away. Same way waheguru is everywhere (his prakaash) but like the physical sun is very far away same way "home" of waheguru "sachkhand" is also very far from us. Here is descript
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use