S4NGH

There is only one religion. The Tisarpanth. All that have come before it have not succeeded in establishing dharam. The abrahamic religions and the dharmic religions contain fragments of the truth but not the complete, whole truth. Only Sikhi has that.Yes theres only one god but why must there only be one religion? It can be argued both ways. There can be many paths to one destination. No one knows gods game/play/plan. The qur'an speaks of both jews and christians as people of the book, as custodians of scripture. The qur'an says that there are faithful amongst the jews and the christians and that the good they do will not be rejected of them (3:113-115 AYA). Why does god (the supposable auther of the qur'an) hold jews and christians in such high regard if they follow false religions? If anything it shows that they have their own role to play in the wider scheme of things. There is only one god and there is only one religion. That religion is truth. - Khatam an-Nabiyyin: Mohammed the Seal of the Prophets. < that is what muslims go by when they say no other prophet will be sent by god and therefore no new religions etc. Thats all fine and dandy and we dont reject the claim that mohammed was the seal of the prophets. "La ilaha illallah" all day long! BUT, Guru Sahib was/is no prophet. He is Satguru. Guru Sahib is Akal Purkh. You keep your kes for the purpose that they serve you. Not because its written that way and therefore we must blindly follow. Same goes for dastar. There is no ritual. It would be a ritual if they served no purpose. Its like an army has its uniform. The uniform provides protection from certain conditions etc and unifies the soldiers, makes them distinguishable etc. In a similar sense we have our own uniform with many of its own benefits. That isnt a ritual. Its not like we believe that the malmal has supernatural powers which protect us from evil nazar ALSO, keeping kes, donning a dastar and shastar is our Pitas Hukum. We are his children and therefore we obey his hukum. End of really. I personally wouldnt go back. Sometimes its nice to let a fool think he's won

Argh penji dont encourage him!!

You posted that vid again...sheikhyourbooty, you need professional help. Lots of it

So apparently the juice of raw cannabis leaves has crazy health benefits. And the same goes for cannabis oil

Why do you post that same vid in every single comment you make? Issues. I didnt try to deflect anything. How can you deny that sufis are not a part of islam?! Omdz brick wall. How can you be so stupid

ACTUALLY he isnt indian at all. His quite simply a Sikh. Thats our ethnic group https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandla_v_Dowell-Lee

Sheikhyobooty, why dont you just talk directly to me?! Hilarious. Or respond to my post. Simple. Why are you avoiding it? The reason I cant simply answer the challenge is because i really cba watching that vid or reading any of your copy-and-past BS. So once you post something authentic in your own words, ill read it and respond appropriately Also, do you even know what apologist means? Ive yet to say anything to defend anything/anyone

Uh huh islam doesnt need defending. Nor am i making any attempt to defend it lol im just refuting your copy-and-paste bs. islam and the islamic state/taliban are two different things. IS/taliban are a group of people who claim to adhere to islam. Thats like the radhaswamis/ namdharis claiming to be the reformed version of sikhi or the true, real sikhi. Obviously theyre not. But thats my word against theirs. Also, why do the vast majority of muslims not recognise the caliphate led by ISIS? Heres a tiny article that may interest you: http://rt.com/news/190468-muslim-scholars-islamic-state/ If islam is this crazed out terrorist religion and the prophet of islam was a peado and whatever else you allege him to be, why didnt Guru Sahib mention any of this? Surely Guru Sahib wouldve wanted people to realise the "true" face of islam and its prophet? Guru Sahib went all the way to makkah yet didnt bother mentioning any of your points...

Written by Imam Afroz Ali The question of music is a complex one and there are valid differences of opinion surrounding it. As a quick introductory statement, we as Muslims must realise that understand the Fiqh (Legal Ruling) of any matter is not as simple as quoting a Qur'anic verse or pointing to a Hadeeth. In fact, the Companions, and definitely the two generations following them (Tabi'een and Tabi' Tabi'een) refrained from quoting from the Sunnah or the Qur'an without proper analysis of many many issues, e.g., linguistic proofs, context of revelation as well as a narration of the Prophet (upon whom be peace and blessings of Allah), absolute and qualified narrations, universality and particularity of verses and narrations, etc. These are deeply developed sciences. The points below are the summaries of rulings based on such a thorough understanding of the Shari'ah, rather than those who simply claim to quote a verse or a Hadith as proof. Further, it is also important to note that music and singing are essentially two different things, not mutually exlusive but certainly not dependent of each other. In other words, one does not have to have music to sing, but at the same time they are both musical matters. In regards to the question itself, the matter can be broken down into the following categories of assessment, each holding its own ruling and differences of opinion. We will start from those matters unanimously agreed upon to be prohibited. 1. The kinds of singing which are unequivocally prohibited are those which contain the celebration of the material world and includes sexual connotation and that which is also inappropriate in speaking, e.g., swearing, sexually expletive language, and the like. In Fiqh this is usually referred to as Tarab. Almost all Hollywood (and Bollywood...) songs will fit in here. 2. The kinds of singing which are also unequivocally prohibited, are those that remove a person away from the worship and appropriate presence with Allah, e.g., leading a person to be involved with cross-gender mixing, lazing around (rather than taking a short break to relax from exhaustion. In such cases, as we will see below, there is permission to listen to musical matters that glorify Allah and praise the Prophet), ignoring one's rights and responsibilities, and the like. 3. Those kinds of singing which are unequivocally permitted are those which glorify Allah and praise the Prophet. Much can be said about this, but it will be a whole book! So in summary, this is usually taken to be permissible as a respite rather than the norm of "iPod in the ear 24/7". It is also permissible to have such appropriate singing of happiness (rather than directly about Allah and His Messenger) that soothe the heart in a Halal manner for festivals and weddings. These kinds of singing are usually referred to as inshad and sama'. 4. Those kinds of singing which are general, and are neither prohibited nor specifically about goodness and happiness (but may be e.g., about politics or environment, etc), the majority of Scholars hold that it is permissible only in its context rather than a habit to listen and enjoy. If it is habituated and leads an individual to ignore their rights and responsibilities, then it is not permitted. Almost all Hollywood and Bollywood songs fit in here. Now to music: 1. The kind of music referred to as malahi are abhorred and prohibited. This kind of music is simply for entertainment for dance, frivolous enjoyment and the like. 2. Those kinds of music from the duff and similar drums (under the category of ma'azif) are unequivocally permissible. Of course, the songs attached to it must be permissible as outlined above. Further the use of the drums are unequivocally permissible for festivals and weddings and joyous times. 3. The critical difference of opinion is regarding different kinds of musical instruments; it is incorrect to suggest that all musical instruments are held to be prohibited in Islam. The fact is that the major prohibition of music is because at the time of the Prophet, they very often were used in the context of malahi - (1) above, hence easily claimed that it is prohibited in all circumstances. But this is not the case. As such (and the same for singing with or without music): i) If the music is part of glorifying Allah and His Messenger, this is held to be permissible by the majority of Scholars; ii) If the music is for entertainment and pastime, it is prohibited; iii) If the music is for soothing and serenity of the mind which helps one to remember Allah, as long as it does not remove one from obeying Allah or one's rights and responsibilities, there is a significant difference of opinion, and is best to minimise such involvement if not avoided. If you saw someone listening to such a musical matter, do not place judgment on them nor force your opinion on others regarding this category. In conclusion, avoid all singing, music, gatherings of entertainment, except for gatherings of melodious remembrance of Allah and His Messenger. And, be cautious if singing and music which are of spiritually happiness (not material) and also leads one to remember Allah and only listen sparingly if one could not avoid it at all.

Sufis consider themselves to be the original true proponents of this pure original form of Islam. Sufism is opposed by Wahhabi and Salafist Muslims. Classical Sufi scholars have defined Sufism as "a science whose objective is the reparation of the heart and turning it away from all else but God". Ranjeet, dont listen to sheikhyobooty. Theres no authenticity in his posts. He copies and pastes the usual christian missionary BS. And your a big copy-and-paster. Nothing authentic in your posts mate how many times have you posted the above vids? Joke

Islam

Take it as a massive up urs mates

Why do i need to tell YOU what i think about islam? Whos this "US" you keep referring to?!

Youre fanning the flames mate and you know it. The act of innocence though ha Hows that a question? Us?! Haha

My muslim masters? LOL please. Come up with something authentic rather than that baseless rubbish you continuously post every chance you get to spew your hatred. What isis and taliban do in their spare time is of little concern to me mate.

Likewise Which questions are you referring to "bro"?

It was a joke buddy

Yeah i dont really feel the need to give any info to your islamophobic bullshiiiit mate. Aint there no christian forum you can take it to? What are you even doin here

Yup haha very What who is up against?!

O Canada! Our home and native land. True patriots blah blah blah we stole you from the red indians and we're actually from europe so your not really our native laaand. Something about tim hortons. Hon hon hon la canadien baguette. Hope that makes you feel a bit more welcome here dear canadian brethren Canadian national anthem ^^^

The 30odd brits were literally sent to the slaughter house. Isis arent the only terrorists

never mind preet. As i said, lets stick to topic

Ok sri sri preet ji

NO! Jeez luise dude. The main goal of marriage is NOT to reproduce. Please dont make me repeat that again. Thanks.Read my previous responses for an answer to "what is the need to get married if you've met your goal of acquiring a santan?". I didnt ask when do you come across the sadhsangat. I asked, where do you come across such a sadhsangat with which you can share all your intimate issues etc. <please dont answer that. Lets stick to topic

Chitargupt is not the raja of hell. I dont understand that logic of yours. Please point out which are your questions since there is not a single question mark visible lol. if you ask a question, i will be sure to answer it ive yet to change the topic