Jump to content

Akalifauj

QC
  • Posts

    2,163
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by Akalifauj

  1. Dhadrianwale and panthpreet sinh set up the Sikh protestors when the police opened fire on the Sikh protesters. Dhadrianwale and panthpreet hopped in police vehicles and were taken to safety by the police. These two lead the Sikh protesters to be slaughtered. Dhadrianwale is a sheep.
  2. The reference they make to Gurbani is about every person is able to obtain Naam. In the previous ages certain people, which include people of different caste and gender were not allowed to touch or go into religious place or even read religious texts. The Gurbani provided in Damdami Taksal rehat is saying now people of every background can go into religious places and read the words of Vaheguru, which is Gurbani. Additionally, this line is from Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji, written before Punj Pyare were created. This means people of all backgrounds even before the Punj Pyare were created were able to obtain Naam from the Guru. Therefore, saying, a person does not need to be part of the Punj Pyare to receive Naam. So there is no discrimination against anyone regardless who they are from obtaining Naam. You are illiterate when it comes to reading Gurbani. When I say you have verbal diarrhea. It means you are writing from your limited intellect and not going by what Gurbani is saying. No where in the Gurbani the DamDami Taksal rehat maryada provides, does it say, now the people have the right to take on the role as the Guru. It clearly says you have full access to the Naam NOW!!!! Punj Pyare take on the role as the Guru and therefore this Gurbani line does not speak on who can be part of the Punj Pyare. ਚਹੁ ਜੁਗਾ ਕਾ ਹੁਣਿ ਨਿਬੇੜਾ ਨਰ ਮਨੁਖਾ ਨੋ ਏਕੁ ਨਿਧਾਨਾ ॥ "To resolve the dispute of the four ages men and women Have been given the one treasure of Naam." SGGSJ Ang 797 Take your time reading this and ask your husband to fully read into it before you respond to this post. Ask him to check what the Gurbani line is saying. Check with other people who are learned in Gurbani and check with Bhai Sahib Singh teeka. It won't harm you to check. I can't stop you from having verbal diarrhea, but it's a request to stop and think.
  3. I was not posting the picture, until a member decided to say I had a dirty mind to think anoop caur would do such a thing. I asked her to apology. She stuck to her original insult. Look at the timeline. Couple of hours pasted before I posted the picture of anoop caur tying her dastar with her top off. I posted that picture to say, I was not lying about what anoop caur is doing on social media sites. Plain and simple. If I was being malicious, in my first post I would have posted the pic. Whether anoop caur likes that picture being posted anywhere should have been her first concern when taking the picture. I say let that picture go throughout the Sikh sangat and the wider world, so she gets a taste of her own medicine. She wants to disgrace Sikhi with her "art". Well, it's karma now playing its role. I don't go out of my way posting that picture, but since she wants it hidden. Well, that's not going to happen. Discussions are civil till someone tells another you have a dirty mind. Plus me and her have resolved the issue of the name calling. You didn't need to get involved. However poster dolly was on a tirade, yet you never came out to correct his behaviour. Can you explain why? We are all brothers and sisters, you are not higher and neither am I higher than you. When asked for an explanation, it's best to give one as a brother or sister and not think you are higher than me and you don't need to provide one. Look above, I provided an explanation.
  4. She is outright misrepresenting sikhs. You are telling everyone to not present her wrong doings because it favors you as a homosexual who wants to indulge in your homosexual behavior. What is wrong will be said as wrong no matter who does it. She is openly not admitting her wrong doing. At least the guy drinking will admit he is wrong. She does not admit she is wrong. Can you not understand the root of the problem being this?
  5. Again stupidity to the highest level. Keep going the verbal diarrhea is working out for you and "it".
  6. "It" can't read punjabi, "it" can only blow air. Mahakaal is the same but opposite end. In a previous thread he claimed Buddha dal and hazur sahib gave kirpan Amrit to women and by doing so they are following Chaupa singh rehatname. When it was pointed out bhai chaupa singh rehatname do not mention giving women kirpan Amrit, he turned into a morph version of harkiran, the "it". By his own stupidity he took his own argument and gave the sangat here how flawed it is. Since chaupa singh does not say to do kirpan Amrit to women and Buddha dal and hazur sahib does, then these two groups are not following the so called first rehat of bhai chaupa singh. When pointed out bhai jeevan singh has written down the account of what happened on 1699, he ran away with his tail between his legs. An honest man wanting to get the full picture would look up bhai jeevan singh's account. But he hates women and only wants to use them as his toys. On the other side we have the "it" I say "it" because "it" refuses to accept their are genders in Sikhi. "It" goes by the name harkiran and "it" can't read punjabi yet claims to know what is gurmat. "It" will not answer the question of, if gender or physical characteristics such as deformity does not matter, then why cant men with cut limbs be part of punj pyare? "It" also refuses to explain sgpc rehat maryada not allowing transgender in punj pyare therefore they have not held up to the "feminist standard of "equality". Mahakaal and harkiran are the viruses in khalsa panth cut from the same cloth. They are uneducated and have verbal diarrhea.
  7. That is your culture.....you favor women walking around naked. Also you are not a woman.....did you forget, you said you are the soul only. Plus you don't have a husband because your husband would mean a male partner, but sense both of you don't recognize genders, gender roles can't be applied to your relationship. You (soul) and partner (soul) lied before Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji and claimed you are opposite genders. This makes your Anand Karaj invalid. Also you lied to Punj Pyare by taking the title kaur. Therefore your didn't take amrit. you are not married in the Sikh way or did not take amrit. You are an imposter. Your whole life is a lie.
  8. Your culture rather have women dance topless around poles and have men slip dollars in thongs. Your culture tells a women is a sex object and needs to have multiple sex partners over the weekend while they are drunk and/or on drugs.
  9. She is not promoting sikhi. But misrepresenting sikhs. She is perverted. She is using outrageous acts as a way to get attention. If she was graviting toward sikhi then she would not be half naked tying a dastar in a photo. She does not say that she made a mistake. She fully believes what she is doing as correct and according to sikhi.
  10. Thank you for apologizing. Anoop caur has a photo with her top off and she is tying a dastar. She may have deleted it off of her Instagram but many people still have the picture. Here it is
  11. That was not an apology. An apology is where a person recognizes they did a wrong thing and apologize for it (calling someone an insult as in this case) and it has no baring on the person who the insult was direct toward. Clearly you are the person with gandh on your mind and want to project it on others.
  12. You are not going to apologize for your insulting comment. I thought you wouldn't.
  13. with your limited searching skills, which you are using as an excuse now. You decided it was right to blame me as so; Where do you get the nerve to speak in this manner? I can run a train on you right now and even make you cry. Keep your mouth shut when you don't know anything. Got it!!! I have the photo and so does a lot of other people of her tying a dastar with her top off. She posted it on a social media site.
  14. How do you know those are the only two photos of her tying a dastar.....are you her manager?
  15. Who said I was talking about a silhouette? I was perfectly clear, it's a picture of her doing her dastar with her top off. Can't you read.
  16. She has a picture of herself tying a dastar naked. She is wearing no top. Her mind is perverted.
  17. Looking at the article Harjinder Singh Khalsa wrote to promote kundalini yoga as an aid to help a person concentrate on Gurbani. He never mentions once how 3HO take up certain hand positions (mudras). Here are some examples of 3HO practicing and promoting mudras. In this link they promote mudras and tell people what are the effects of doing certain mudras. https://www.3ho.org/kundalini-yoga/mudra Gyan Mudra as they call it, Stimulates knowledge, wisdom, receptivity, and calmness. But does it really? Listen to what Gurbani has to say on the topic of mudras. ਭਗਉਤੀ ਮੁਦ੍ਰਾ ਮਨੁ ਮੋਹਿਆ ਮਾਇਆ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ bhagautee mudhraa man mohiaa maaeiaa ||1|| rahaau || The sacred mudras - ritualistic hand gestures - are made, but the mind remains enticed by Maya. ||1||Pause|| ang 1348 performing mudras doesn't stimulate knowledge or wisdom, instead it drives a person further into maya as Gurbani says. What about receptivity and calmness? Well maya broken down means a person is in duality and full of doubts. Which means you are not receptive and surely not calm. So there you have it 3HOer's mudras are not going to help anyone become more attuned, concentrate, or help a person in anyway to connect to Shabad Guru in meditation. Next we make analyze breathing techniques or postures. Stay tuned for the next Guru given teachings on Kundalini yoga.
  18. You are not a woman, did you forget you said you are only a soul.
  19. You are trolling him because you don't like what he says. It's not because he talks too much. If he said the things you wanted him to say. Then it would be completely fine with you and you wouldn't care how much he talked. In fact you would be praising him and telling him to keep going. Since he doesn't, now you are saying he is preventing himself from growing spiritually. Clearly you have no spiritual advancement for trolling someone and it shows the level of anger built up in you.
  20. This is grehasti Jeevan: ਇਕਿ ਗ੍ਰਿਹ ਕੁਟੰਬ ਮਹਿ ਸਦਾ ਉਦਾਸੀ ॥ ਸਬਦਿ ਮੁਏ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮਿ ਨਿਵਾਸੀ ॥ ਅਨਦਿਨੁ ਸਦਾ ਰਹਹਿ ਰੰਗਿ ਰਾਤੇ ਭੈ ਭਾਇ ਭਗਤਿ ਚਿਤੁ ਲਾਈ ਹੇ ॥੭॥ Ang 1046
  21. Rehat is more dear to the Guru than a Sikh. Keep talking only the dead are listening. Satguru is the guide and boat. The gurmukh teaches how to paddle across by his guru given wisdom. The mind is evil and selfish. Satguru doesn't want speech, for Akal Purakh has spoken. The head is to be in the feet of the Guru, rolling in the dirt.
  22. The girl who wrote this piece is of very low character. No credible research would have been done. This is the case of I have messed up my life, so should others because I am miserable. Search her up, she exposes herself openly to the world. No shame in her.
  23. How can you follow gurbani when you can't read Gurbani in gurmukhi and which means you can't understand Gurbani. These are all lies. Sant ji in a video gives a reason to why women are not in punj pyare. The reason has nothing to do with women being pure or impure. You stated in a later post, your husband checks to see what is said in punjabi because you can't understand punjabi. Since you lied about what sant ji said, this mean your husband the punjabi interpreter also cant understand punjabi. My initial assessment of you being worse than a blind Hindu is spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use