Kira
-
Posts
1,521 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Posts posted by Kira
-
-
I want to become a MOD now
everyone's volunteering and my need for peer approval demands i do so too.
0 -
3 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:
Way to ignore the evidence.
So you're saying sikhsangat is a youth website?
My birth year is posted on the site. Maybe you and GuestSingh can go dig it up.
I have all the endurance in the world to hold fast while you two flail around.
Keep up the good work guys.
how old are you?
0 -
30 minutes ago, S4NGH said:
Work, on you're. Spelling Grammar: Punctuation. pleaze. Lord have mercy.
@MrDoaba may be able to shed some light on your concerns. What do you make of this hindunisation?
May Saraswati bless OP with great divine Knowledge and may Ganesha bless him with the literary might of Brahma.
1 -
32 minutes ago, InderjitS said:
...clean?
no just filthy. Stop sl8tshaming my fellow RSS agent :((
2 -
you people are filthy.
2 -
Just now, MisterrSingh said:
That's fine. You're an excellent contributor to this forum, and I respect your opinions. You know I'm not one for advocating degeneracy and the kind of nonsense that passes for modern life in certain circles, but sometimes we forget that behind the ideologies and the loud voices, there are people like you and I who are just trying to make sense of it all, and maybe I'm being naive, but I'd like to think a bit of understanding and compassion for people goes a long way. I'm not suggesting we start conducting Anand Karan ceremonies for trans people, lol.
that's transphobia there mate, the internet police are coming. I have no problem with trans or even gay folk, they're human beings and deserve the same compassion we give our loved ones.
1 -
- Popular Post
QuoteIf someone has cancer, then does that mean that God made a mistake? of course not. Everything is a part of human, even being LGBTQ. If someone is committed to Sikhi, and truly wants to give their head to the Guru, why should their sexuality stop them? Science is showing that sometimes your sexuality isnt your "choice", and a lot of programs meant to "cure" LGBTQ people have failed.
Sexuality is different from Transgender-ism, Gay folk aren't trying to tell people God made a mistake with their body. Comparing Cancer to gender mismatch is like comparing a knife wound to an orange. Cancer can be treated, Cancer patients don't tell people that God made a mistake. They accept it and move on. Transgenders tell people God made a mistake with their gender, they're not willing to accept their body, how can you even argue that feelings such as that are in line with Gurmat.
QuoteAs I have asked before. can you please cite any Gurbani. or Rehat? You already gave a historical example.
That is from Rehit, These checks were always conducts by the highest Mahapurkhs. You can look through Gurbani about accept yourself for how you are, even if you're disfigured. What's so unique about transgenders that they can't accept that their gender is the one God gave them.
QuoteHow is it? there are actual chemicals involved and this is a complex issue. Assuming it is a mental disorder, does that mean we dont allow mental people to receive Khand Di Phaul? in 1699 did the Guru say no mental people allowed to give their head?
It was always classified as a mental disorder, only recently when the PC police arrived that people started taking that out. Trasngenderism is caused by an imbalance in the brain, the Khalsa is the saroop of the Guru. Of course they would make sure the ones who enter into it are able to uphold it without any problems.
QuoteHistorically Sikhs didnt do a lot of stuff, like allow women into the Panj Pyare, or even in a lot of cases, women into the Khalsa Army and gave them a separate initiation process called "Kirpan Di Phaul".
In alot of cases? Don't exaggerate. Women aren't allowed into the Panj for a valid reason, Mahapurkhs like Sant Jarnail Singh Ji all said women aren't allowed in, Woman already give birth (physical) while men give spiritual birth. There's equality. Just like God gave women a method of birth and involvement in the panth, God also gave men a role too.
The Hijra were always around since the time of the Gurus, yet no record of one being inaugurated into the Panth. To argue that a social issue that was around back then is somehow a "modern" development is an insult to the all seeing eye of the Guru.
Don't get me wrong, If they want to join that's fine. But they can't call themselves transgender or start telling people God made a mistake. They'll be given the surname Singh if biologically male and Kaur if otherwise a female.
4 -
- Popular Post
21 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:That's harsh, bro.
I'm not being harsh lol, im speaking from history.
4 minutes ago, TheeTurbanator said:I was hoping for a proper discussion with reference to Gurbani, Rehat, and History. It’s not good enough to give shallow one line answers on such complex issues. I didn’t come here to get simple answers I can get from my local Gurdwara baba, I came here for intellectually stimulating and productive conversations.
There's a rigorous process to who gets amrit, in the ye olden days they used to do alot of looking into the person. If the person was a muslim the Nihangs used to make them eat pork to fully to prove they weren't muslim anymore (spies and such). Things like transgenderism (gender dysphoria) would be and is a mental disorder. Can you imagine a dude, dressing up as a Singhni? We're meant to accept Hukam, not tell people God made a mistake in giving us this gender.
5 -
- Popular Post
neither. They wouldn't be allowed to take Amrit.
6 -
well Jagmeets doing better than me. He has his flaws, but good luck to him.
1 -
7 minutes ago, DailyMail said:
What a pointless thread. Utter nonsense.
Don't you love Conspiracy nuts? Under the pretext of "questioning" everything they turn anything into a universal war between gay frogs and inter-dimensional space robots that feed on the blood of new born babies.
0 -
42 minutes ago, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:
Times change. In times gone by they would have put someone that created a ridiculous thread like this one and anyone that engaged on it in the freak show as a freak where the children could pay 50p.... to look at the freak. These days, they give them 200 views and a thumbs up on the internet. Times change.
like that?
0 -
48 minutes ago, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:
Can I ask a serious question ?
You're all non-white yes? Most of you live in Britain yes ? You're aware that non-racist whites and black and asian britons have been having the time of their life the last 3 days making jokes at the expense of, and laughing at the racists / white supremists right ? You're aware this thing has killed the british racist's argument so cold stone dead that they've been in hiding for the last few too upset to make public comments yes ? Just 2 questions I wanna ask you all then :
1) Do any of you have a sense of humour ?
2) Do any of you have enough going on upstairs to understand what this all means to the conversation about the construction and deconstruction of race and identity ?
I'm sorry I had to ask.....because whilst the whole of the UK has been having the right conversation about this...sprinkled with the right amount of humour, you lot seem to be a bunch of humourless nuns and monks intent on talking about strange things less important.
no..humour is haraam.
2 -
2 minutes ago, Guest michigan said:
Exactly. I asked myself this too......
but your missing an important point. If it was faked then were they actually killed?
If they were in on it and the whole event was staged then we have been fooled for decades..........
but if they had no idea and were really killed on that day then they would be shaheeds since they died due to their religion. But no one has asked these questions.
We need to look into this further rather than dismiss these things out of hand. I'm gonna do some research.
0 -
5 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:
This guy looks like he has a hamburger, a bottle of wine and a fat cigar every night. Lol.
Too many pakoras and samosa at langar time I think.
0 -
8 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:
Jesus as we know of him is from the Eastern Mediterranean, like the Phoenicians /Canaanite. It would be highly unlikely he would be black.
I never said he was black, I said there's sources that say he changed form, so he could've been anything.
0 -
15 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:
In Canada? That's a shame. I thought there'd be at least a few who are fighting the good fight.
meant the UK bro. Things are messy here at best.
1 -
48 minutes ago, InderjitS said:
some years ago I watched a programme where Ethiopian Christians claimed he was a native. the debate will rage on forever, but looking at articles most concede he was somewhere in between white/black.
interesting you mention this Bro. There was an account discovered in Egypt a while back, a really early one (about 100-200 years after Christ) where they mention Jesus has the ability to change shape, infact he did this a-lot. That was (according to the text) why Judas kissed Jesus to check it actually was him.
0 -
I mean i dont really see how people are shocked by this. The first humans were of the darker shade...but somehow the first Brits were white? mind blown.
1 -
6 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:
Thank you by the way for being so honest and being brave enough to share your prejudices.. It's a quality most people are scared to do! Respect
more hot air as usual. I applause you on being the typical hypocritical stance. Prejudiced for calling you on the very post you tried to quote? hilarious. You're just throwing on buzzwords to appear morally superior, which really does show where you stand.
0 -
19 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:
I'm glad prominent Sikh representation in the Canadian government is annoying the Indian regime. It's amusing to see the Indian government constantly raise concerns and undermine foreign Sikhs to whichever western government it deals with at the time, almost suggesting that one key condition of Indian cooperation hinges on how well the western government in question undermines its Sikh population under the flimsy pretence of preventing "extremism." Unfortunately, Indian economic influence means they are, and will be, heard to a certain degree.
It's so obvious how the Indian apparatus wants the Sikh diaspora to be toothless, voiceless, and powerless. Seeing Canadian Sikhs in somewhat influential and visible roles in Canadian politics must be so galling for India. British Sikhs would do well to follow their example when it comes to political engagement and involvement.
Good luck there, the ones in power are either completely retarded or simply in it for their own means.
0 -
14 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:
I love you anyway! So tired of running round the houses.. May I humbly point you towards Mool mantar, japji sahib and consider nirankaar..
Funny...because you needed a reminder about a while ago what a verse from Japji Sahib meant, where you tried peddling your usual nonsense and got put down. Don't quote Gurbani if you can't even read or understand it, you mentioned History, yet you bring up Scripture. You really aren't the brightest are you?
2 -
3 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:
So many words so little substance
The fact that you never reference them is substance enough. You're nothing more than hot air.
2 -
1 hour ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:
You don't need to apologise to me mate.. Waking up each morning and living with your need to create falsehoods about sikhi and sikh history is something you need to be sorry about.. It's all love bro one day when you are unable to dance around and avoid facts you'll be apologising to your own consciousness for denying rationalism
You've never even touched a Sikh historical text dated pre-20th century..that's a bit rich coming from you. Then again its always one rule for you and another for everyone else.
2
Hindunised Sikhs
in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Posted
If we believe the Nihungs that this was none other than the Guru Mata herself Mata Sahib Devan Ji then may I be the first to say...Mother was a Queen.