Jump to content

Sukhvirk1976

Members
  • Posts

    878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Sukhvirk1976

  1. You just talk nonsense. I see a commonality amongst most big mouth bigots, attack attack attack but as soon as someone demonstrates there hypocrisy and points out how shallow there knowledge is. If you were going to quote the hukumnama or even knew first hand how did you get it so wrong... Your a Fraud, the genie is out the bottle
  2. Lol. You can't even substantiate anything you have said.. You have falsely referenced a hukumnama and attributed something to Guru gobind Singh Ji, dashmesh pita.. Shame on you.. Your worse than ram rai The wording of your reference is totally wrong which demonstrates the respect you have for the words of Guru sahibs. Better to post as a woman than as a half baked fake.. You shook? I tell you what let's go back to basics.. Since you are a authority on things can you please provide me with a reference number of the hukumnama you are talking about and a link to it.. Forgive me for assuming that you probably have never done your own research
  3. Muslim names.. Hahaha From someone who is self named "genie" from the Arabic story of 1001 nights.. Jinn How ridiculous lol
  4. Hahaha You're the one who made the claim.. Show me where you get your assertion from.. Don't worry I don't expect you will because you can't, because you're lazy and can't think or understand the importance of being concise (shudh). Jog on
  5. You obviously have no respect for the tropes and values you so hide behind.. If you did you wouldn't make such lazy comments
  6. Hahaha.. can you even quote a commandment? Come on let's see how far your intellect takes you.. Isn't it ironic that you call yourself 'genie'? Shall I pretend I'm Aladdin lol
  7. it would help if you constructed a coherent question.. Are someone mocked 'one of the 52' (interesting mix between numerals and words) commandments (are you talking about hukumnana? ) stating "a Sikh daughter should only be giving to another Sikh" what exactly is a Sikh (if you are going to quote hukumnana then atleast try and be 'Shudh') ? If you gonna step up raise your game
  8. Good question? It seems like It's far easier to sit and condemn people who have no material relevance to our lives.. Rage against a non-existent threat.. Rather in the imagined defense of the quam people undermine and degenerate the beliefs they think they are supposed to be upholding. Ironic isn't it
  9. I happen to agree with very much of what you have said.. However I don't agree with the assertion that the behavior of the marauding, expansionists means that the political manifestations of Islamic dogmatism is in any way intrinsic to Islam.. Surely that is what guru gobind Singh Ji reminds aurangzeb of in zafarnama
  10. Hang on a minute.. This comment is ridiculous on a number of levels.. 1. The islamists who you apparently rage against are not the same as people who are Islamic and proud of the scientific achievements that came under and flourished within the intellectual pursuits that Islamic theology fostered. 2. Islamic scholars pursued sciences because in the early days of Islam the pursuit of truth was a noble ideal 3. Islamists in the modern context within which you are employing the term reject the scientific pursuits and achievements of historical Arab intellectuals 4. Your whole sentence is also wrong because they did not develop existing traditions of Arab and Persian scholars but actually, they were largely influenced by Greek philosophy such as Socrates, Aristotle etc.. Your prejudice demonstrates your lack of willing to get to the facts or even scratch beneath the surface.
  11. The fascists are out in force.. as is clearly demonstrated by this thread when you become reductive in your thoughts the only way to go is to become even more reductive.. Become even more obsessed with nonsensical arguments.. We should give sewadaars protractors to determine whether a dastaar is acceptable... Whilst we are at it lets check whether the shade of the dastaar is acceptable.. In the hands of the bigots who even think this is a issue the message of Guru Nanak Dev Ji will be lost forever
  12. @jkvlondon Moreover what I find particularly interesting is that no where in bani or any writings of sikh scholars Muhamed is spoken of as a rapist.. Why would guru nanak dev ji travel to mecca, (if you believe that sakhi) if he thought Muhamed was a rapist, why would guru arjun Dev Ji invite a follower of a rapist Mian Mir to lay the foundation at Harmandir Sahib, why would guru gobind Singh Ji keep relations with Pir Baba bhuddu shah if he followed such people? Can you please address this issue?
  13. You very easily reaffirmed your thoughts on the first part of the question but what about the second? How do you resolve in your logic Mian Mir etc.. Don't worry I don't expect a response, it would require khoj
  14. What a ridiculous nonsensical statement.. Of absolutely no value and adding nothing to the discussion.. The ignorance of some people makes them see enemies everywhere.. Firstly the soldiers and police operating in panjab included many who were Sikh.. Kps Gill Secondly tytler and sajjan didn't kill thousands of Sikhs, rather they facilited, oversaw and directed the pogroms in which mobs killed Sikhs in Delhi. Thirdly what is your point? Even many of the militants themselves have spoken about going to Pakistan and training, bomb making etc.. It's not even controversial, I'm not even criticising it from the perspective of revolutionary activism.. Do you have a alternative narrative of how those people developed specialised knowledge Seriously how incoherent can someone be
  15. Well I think most khalistani militants were always very frank about the fact that they went over the border to train.. It's hardly a secret.. Where did and who did train and arm,.?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use