Sukhvirk1976
-
Posts
878 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by Sukhvirk1976
-
Why born as sikh though? I don't believe anyone is
-
I think you have just answered your own question.. Modern anand karaj didn't exist before 1699 but it did exist
-
Why fortunate?
-
Why are you fixating on being a part of a religion? Says a lot really
-
You see I feel pretty much exactly like that about your pontifications. So at least we share something.. You have a habit of making statements and then hide behind vitriol.. It's very easy to lash out and rage much more difficult to actually substantiate through discourse any of your points. As I have said before I never expected you to provide any evidence to support your outbursts.. Although one day you may burst your own bubble..
-
Yes and that distinct identity was to transcend identity..
-
Did your parents do naam karan and vidya sanskaar for you? This is totally nonsensical because it would exclude people who have taken Amrit but whose parents hadn't done the first 2.?
-
Just to point out a simple historical fact.. Anand karaj existed before Amrit sanchar so that can't be true
-
Checkmate? Lol
-
Checkmate? Are you genuinely calling me a islamaphobe? Lol
-
I wouldn't have labelled you that. I thought you were being quite honest that you have moments of darkness.. I don't think you should frame your feelings like that brother ?
-
Wow
-
Fair play at least you acknowledge it ??
-
I agree those with the loudest voices, shouting people down and not encouraging dialogue, discussion, are the ones to worry about!
-
Care to qualify that opinion? .. Which is 'your' opinion.
-
Fair enough. I always have referred to it as quran sharif.. I'm not sure i would call any religious scripture that speaks of the divine as gandh
-
Why do you find it antagonistic?
-
I'm not I just think it would be prudent to qualify it
-
Yes I agree but langar as a institution is multi layered. Sitting in pangat with people of all backgrounds and doing sewa is a humbling act and if one doesn't partake in that and experience equality won't understand the message.. It was primarily aimed at higher caste Hindus and Muslim nobility who would not sit and eat with those believed to be lower than them..
-
I know it sounds counterintuitive but from guru nanak times taking langar in pangat was a prerequisite to guru Darshan and one could do the first without the other.. Personally I wouldn't but that is the convention
-
That’s a bit lame.. Usually proffering evidence to support a proposition.. I don't know of any evidence maybe you could point me in the right direction? Or was it just a throwaway comment without any basis?
-
Other faiths don't share the principles of sikhi which is to be inclusive of other religious philosophies
-
People can have langar without visiting darbar.. In fact traditionally taking langar in pangat with Sangat comes before entering darbar of guru sahib.. Not the other way round
-
I don't understand your point? If someone is drunk they shouldn't be allowed in to the gurdwara.. That is what I said..
-
It's a obvious question with out any substantiation it's just here say?