dharamyudh

Ekta

Woops I mixed them up. Baba Kharak Singhs bro, thought you were talking about the Budha Dal one.

Ekta.

Ekta.

Vaheguru.

Ekta.

Ekta

Ekta.

Bro do you read? When did I imply that he made Indira pay for the damage. You do the damage, you should be the one who pays for it. This is what they did. Simple as.

Ekta.

I'm done with this argument man, this is just going to go around in circles. All I'm going to say is that if we expect Panthic unity to ever happen, we gotta stop disrespecting other jathas Mukhis/Jathedars and Mahapurakhs in general. Just creates a cycle of non-sense and nindya, something I don't want to engage in. You wanna engage in nindya go ahead.

Perspective of Bhai Jagraj Singh

Ekta.

Ekta.

Go look at yourself before you start questioning Singhs like Baba Santa Singh Ji 96 Crori or any other Mahapurakh of the Panth. Literally sit on a forum and do Nindya of GurSikhs.

@proactiveYou wanna talk about Singhs like they have any right to. I respect all Singhs who have done seva and bhagati for the panth be it Taksal, Nihang, AKJ, Nirmalas, Udasis, and any samparada of the garden of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj.

See I'll never understand you lot. Respectfully, don't speak on it. We're obviously not going to agree on anything. What have you done to question any Mahapurakh? Keep doing nindya, you're only soiling your own clothes at the end.

Being a Mahapurakh and sevadaar of the panth of course.

Oral tradition that comes directly from Baba Sahib Singh Kaladhari themselves but alright buddy.

If you cared to read, I said the post SPEAKS about the event of Baba Sahib Singh Ji Kaladhari. I'm not telling you to use it as a reference. It is a perspective which speaks to this thread. You should go message the guy so you can both have a discourse on both perspectives. Maybe he can give you his references and so on so forth.

Also by all means you can go and message Kshatriya Khalsa about it as well. I'm just going off what I gathered from the Nihang perspective man.

Uh.. I mean that is considered history no? I'm just offering an explanation for how he may have got the information. Believe what you wanna believe.

I'd look to put out that the story of Baba Sahib Singh Ji Kaladhari 96 Crori getting removed from Sri Akal Takht Sahib is in the Nihang oral tradition. Akali Baba Santa Singh Ji 96 Crori became a Singh under Akali Baba Chet Singh Ji 96 Crori and succeeded him. Akali Baba Chet Singh Ji 96 Crori themselves succeeded Baba Sahib Singh Ji Kaladhari. That's how he most likely got his information. This post speaks on the event https://www.instagram.com/p/CQyGYOGscF5/

That doesn't matter. The name is Sanskrit, it doesn't belong to either group. We're all from the same culture which stems from Sanskrit so names are bound to overlap.

What? First of all get your facts right. Just because modern Hindus use these names doesn't mean it isn't apart of our culture. What consitutes a pure Panjabi name? Panjabi names are derived from both Sanskrit and Farsi. It seems you don't want to associate with Hindus. I hope you realize the original meaning of Hindu was an individual who lived past the Indus river and practiced a dharmic religion. The modern meaning of Hindu has nothing to do with the puratan meaning. These are names that are part of the overall dharmic spiritual culture. Look at all the Gurus names except for SatGuru Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Sahib Ji Maharaj. Each Guru Maharaj had Sanskrit names. You can even look at some of the Sahibzaade of the SatGurus such as Lakhmi Das and Sri Chand Just look throughout our history we had Singhs named: Akali Baba Hanuman Singh Ji 96 Crori. Akali Baba Prahlad Singh Singh Ji 96 Crori. Two modern examples I can think of are: Bhai Avtar Singh Ji Brahma Nihang Bhai Durga Singh Ji Arifke There are PLENTLY more.