Mahakaal Singh

not all moneh are like that however most amritdharis are, and your talking about moneh being perverted, the gianis are the worst sexually deprived guys in the gurudwara, when they sit together they talk about all kinds of <admin-profanity filter activated> and in every sentance use the word <admin-cut>. and your saying that these fat guys are role models? and im also talking from experience Mod note: children use this forum so watch your language in future.

firstly photos arent true they are the artists conception, secondly my oh my do you live on this planet? singhs and singhania in gurudware are the most pompous gits on earth, the singhania feel that moneh shoulnt and cant prepare langar and the singhs feel that its ok to take money off moneh when it comes to building garahiya and the golak yet a monah has no right in how the gurudwara is run or no right to go up on stage and speak.

maharaj had both moneh prepare his food and amritdharis. You are the one with the misconception that maharaj doesnt love those who havent taken amrit. Maharaj says that one who is full of hankaar is no sikh of mine. You are the type of person who is being discussed in this thread a pompous amritdhari. Bhagat ravidaas and many other bhagats were moneh, yet thge recieved a great padvi of their inclusion into Adh Guru Granth. Amrit is for those who are willing to participate in gods army, not all people are up for that hence why guru maharaj asks for your head when you take amrit because ultimatly by joining akaal fauj who are submitting to death. You and many other hankaaris who feel that they will get some extra attention form maharaj are in a very big misconception.

so thats what you want to portray as true sikhs the mone and the sehajdharis, fairenough no probs with sehajdharis but you mone the face of sikhi hah! dont make me laugh I said nothing but being a true sikh. I am telling the truth about how these amritdharis who act superior go around saying that non-amritdhari are not sikhs, but yet, they got no courage to fight back when needed. Even some of them wouldn't shake your hand unless you are one of them. Anyway, I got no love for amritdharis and keshdharis. look moneh and sehjdharis and amritdharis are all equal in the eyes of God, i admit there are some pompous amritdharis who feel superior than moneh, because before i became a singh i was given mos gried by amritdharis because i was a) a mona and b) did kirtan. However i didnt go round saying amritdharis are bad Mod edit - quit with the swearing! Guru ji loves keshdharis and amritdharis but dispises amritdharis /keshdharis who are pompous and full of hankaar. remember we are all apart of the khalsa, even if we are non amritdharis because we all form a brotherhood by universally being sikh however we are only a part of Akaal Fauj if we give out head to our guru

shere punjab hah more like gidars of punjaab, nasty young unclean chavi mone who stand infront of pubs holding a pint in their haands bopping up and down shouting like phudus "punjabi" "singh is king" at a vaisakhi mela with khanda flags in their other hands and bright orange khanda armbands chacking all the girls out and causing pange with the pakis and sule But yet, these are the same "nasty young unclean chavi mone" who did mad seva for the sikh community back in the 90's. I got more respect for monay than these so called "Gursikhs". what seva, please enlighten me

so thats what you want to portray as true sikhs the mone and the sehajdharis, fairenough no probs with sehajdharis but you mone the face of sikhi hah! dont make me laugh

shere punjab hah more like gidars of punjaab, nasty young unclean chavi mone who stand infront of pubs holding a pint in their haands bopping up and down shouting like *Mod Edit "punjabi" "singh is king" at a vaisakhi mela with khanda flags in their other hands and bright orange khanda armbands chacking all the girls out and causing pange with the pakis and sule *please refrain from using swear words

wear a dumalla and you'll never know what caste you are

i wonder if i have ever met the easter bunny

when an amritdhari wears any shastar it automatically becomes a kirpan. because the yeilder will only use that shastar for self defence and the protection of others i.e. kirp- to do kirpa and an- anak for ones self defence. so may it be double edged, triple edged a khanda what ever it becomes a kirpan if he yeilder is amrit dhari. because realistically there are no shastars called kirpans, there are teghs and shamshirs which we think are kirpans but as explained before kirpan is a generalised description for any weapon i cant clearly see whats this in a plate in ur avator MAHAKAL SINGH :umm: now i can see it clearly :cool: OMG thts disgusting!! That is not gurmat!!!!!!! are you a guru, no. then you have no gurmat

its also apart of shri dasam guru granth sahibs shastar naam malaa

if its sharp yes if it isnt then hell no

why are you talking crap eh shant birti de hai ... ess layi tension na saab da rah alag alag ... sant anek matti ke .... msn te message mill rahe ???? nahi yaar mide nahi

why are you talking crap

pranaam shastara nu!

there is a small minority of hindus, who i dont even class as true hindus such as the rss but there are bigger threats, threats which are within our panth such as issues on raagmala and guru dasam granth which has divided the panth within itself. personally i blame akaal takht for not approaching the issue directly and resolving these issues once and for all!

ok then here it is. for the past couple of days all that rammu has done is spread propaganda against hindus and i am quite sick of it as they arent the sole reason why our panth is going into the drain. there are bigger issues than hindus rammu himself is a hindu so i think he needs to see a shrink and get his "issues" with hindus sorted. sikh teaches the spread of love not hatred

when an amritdhari wears any shastar it automatically becomes a kirpan. because the yeilder will only use that shastar for self defence and the protection of others i.e. kirp- to do kirpa and an- anak for ones self defence. so may it be double edged, triple edged a khanda what ever it becomes a kirpan if he yeilder is amrit dhari. because realistically there are no shastars called kirpans, there are teghs and shamshirs which we think are kirpans but as explained before kirpan is a generalised description for any weapon

oi rammu your missing one The Rammu Jacka$$ Party

hellooooooooooooooooooooooooo in this case the sardar was very clever

loooooooooooooooooooooooooool!

which one lol

taurine is 2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, its actually good for us in small quantities. It can be synthesized or extracted from plants, bacteria or animals. Our bodies contain amino acids this is also an amino acid. you reading too much into it man. ill give you an idea, if your ever unsure about anything due to your beliefs stick to mohta di daal and roti with just plain simple water. in this day and age every food has ingredients which are derived from bacteria or animals, you simply cant avoid it unless you live in a cave. and for the love of god its a body lotion, why do you people go so extreme? dont you take medicines, they contain gelatin and alcohol. As long as you dont take alcohol for selfish purposes then its not sin. Just like marijuana, you can get a high on it but then you can also use it to treat cancer, or take it as sukhaa shaheedi degh :cool:

just like akj's feel that if you dont do saahs girhaas your not doing waheguru jaap properly (like ye right) guru maharaj is saying that if bani in KIRTAN isnt read to the correct raag then your not doing bani properly, its like singing a shabad about the happiness of life at a funeral! bani in kirtan without it in raag isnt appropriate

we would be just as bad as muslims with their sharriya laws, lord please kill fundamentalism and extremism! Mahakaal Singh Ji, a little off topic...but I am just curious as to why u have a picture of some devi devta up. All the Gurus from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind SIngh clearly state they hold absolutely no faith or trust in any devi devta...so what is the use of displaying such pictures especially on a SIkh Sangat Forum? Don't get me wrong, I'm not upset at you and I am not trying to be anti-hindu/anti bahman or anything like that. I would ask the exact same question if you or anyone else had put up a picture of Jesus Christ, Moses, or any one else. I'm just curious :-) WJKK WJKF its actually got a lot to do with sikhi, read up on the udhaar of prehlaad bhagat