Goli Da Vair Sada

OOOOOOOOO VERY INTERESTING YOU ARE SO SMART BRO :TH: lol, i love it kuljeet veer ji. i thought i was the only 1 annoyed by rupinder the apologist. hes always tryin to explain and justify anti sikhs actions. can i get a thumbs up for rupinder? :TH:

wats ur point? i dont understand? r u sayin that sikhs shud not confronted them for wat they do there and let them go on wiv wat they do? also dont judge all singh by ur own standarads, sum chardikala singh will do the job dont worry bou that. ofcourse bruv, the internet is always ready for shaheedia. anyway i am just putting my opinion accross on this as this has become big news. clever how this overweight saadh will now become a big celeb in India, in my opinion the singhs are being played again and reacting just the way the sacha sauada saadh and the other instigators probably wanted us to. :TH: nice 1, judging ppl by ur own standaras again. :TH: gud job, well done :TH: i dont see y my view is that important, its obviously not what the majority think. sorry to anyone i have offended in my personal comments. ur right bruv and im sorry, u do hav a right to an opinion and i shudnt hav been so confrontational. i jus get annoyed wen our own sikhs make the panth sound weak. initially thats the impression i got, reading bak through the posts i realise i may hav read to much into wat u ment.

wats ur point? i dont understand? r u sayin that sikhs shud not confronted them for wat they do there and let them go on wiv wat they do? also dont judge all singh by ur own standarads, sum chardikala singh will do the job dont worry bou that. ofcourse bruv, the internet is always ready for shaheedia. anyway i am just putting my opinion accross on this as this has become big news. clever how this overweight saadh will now become a big celeb in India, in my opinion the singhs are being played again and reacting just the way the sacha sauada saadh and the other instigators probably wanted us to. :TH: nice 1, judging ppl by ur own standaras again. :TH: gud job, well done :TH:

:devil: wats ur point? i dont understand? r u sayin that sikhs shud not confronted them for wat they do there and let them go on wiv wat they do? also dont judge all singh by ur own standarads, sum chardikala singh will do the job dont worry bou that.

wats ur point? i dont understand? r u sayin that sikhs shud not confronted them for wat they do there and let them go on wiv wat they do? also dont judge all singh by ur own standarads, sum chardikala singh will do the job dont worry bou that.

wat r we waiting for? guru gobind singh ji sed that 1 who is a singh ov his will engage an army alone. how many singhs does it take to send a tyrant to dharam raj? its time we started doing things off our own backs. who needs the leadership of man wen we have guru granth sahib ji? wen we r old wiv no teeth, little kes, unable to leave our beds and punjab is in a worser state then it is today we will wish we did sumthing. it would be perfect if all ideologies cud exist together in peace but that wud only be possible if we all believed the same or nufin at all. if we as a people r not willing to fight for our existance then we hav no right to exist at all. there comes a tym wen the bullet has to decide who is right and who is wrong. jo bole so nihal sat sri akaaalllllllllllllllllllllll

it wud be interesting to here prem and rupinder singh's views on this

in punjab the majority ov ppl dont even want khalistan. why? its cus they dont even kno wat it is to be sikh cus they hav lost there sikhi. no1 givs a crap cus they get taught a distorted version of sikhi. attack taht problem. remembering 1984 is good but if in the future there are no sikhs to remember it no1 will care. wat need to be attcked are those in punjab who will distort sikhi and they youth off punjab need to be shown wat sikhi is. murking off badal wudnt be a bad start, but more needs to be done. wats the point in having a land for the khalsa if there is no khalsa to occupy it. truthfully i think we need to setup sikh instituins from her to teach the youth wat sikhi is then the rest will follow. but its long.

fateh. it aint cus ur dastaar. tie that as tight as u want. it happens to a few friends i have and seems to be common. its cus ur tying ur topnot to tight. do make it o tight. it pulls the hair out. u see it happening wiv black women who do there cornrolls to tight. jus lossen it. it wont make the hair grow back but will stop it gettin worse.

sarbat khalsa declared khalistan in 1986, khalistan is occupied land./ india out

let me turn the question around. why do monay look down on amritharis? why why why why why dont pretend like it dont happen, they do it more then amritharis do.

More of the same bigotry, intolerance, aggressive slandering. Rupinder is NOT an <banned word filter activated>. He is a good man with an independent mind. He does not deserve to be abused and called names like that, just because someone disagrees with him. Especially in the context of Bhai Kanhaiya, whose message was that even those who fought against Sikhs to oppress them deserved compassion and help afterwards. Guru Fateh dont tell me u never heard about mehtab and sukha who chopped off massa rangher head? wat about sukha and jinda who shot genral vaidya? wat about bhai ranjit singh who shot nakli nirankari baba gurbachan? u pik and choose wat u feel. true u shud show love but sumtyms u gotta show force. Interesting! What I would really like to know is what is the threat to the Panth that Ravinder Powar poses? Is Ravinder Powar comparable to Massa Rangar or Indira Ghandi? How does Ravinder Powar's profile differ from say Mr Pardaan of X Gurdwara who allows alcohol, meat and parties within the Gurdwara premises? my point exactly, u dont know about the incident just as i dont kno. so why u commenting on it for. its all stiring at the end off the day. my only point is this. sikhi is not a pacisfist way of life. u shud always show love but sumtyms u have to use the sword. but u shud always excercise restraint.

More of the same bigotry, intolerance, aggressive slandering. Rupinder is NOT an <banned word filter activated>. He is a good man with an independent mind. He does not deserve to be abused and called names like that, just because someone disagrees with him. Especially in the context of Bhai Kanhaiya, whose message was that even those who fought against Sikhs to oppress them deserved compassion and help afterwards. Guru Fateh dont tell me u never heard about mehtab and sukha who chopped off massa rangher head? wat about sukha and jinda who shot genral vaidya? wat about bhai ranjit singh who shot nakli nirankari baba gurbachan? u pik and choose wat u feel. true u shud show love but sumtyms u gotta show force.

rupinder sorry for calling u an <banned word filter activated>. i shudnt hav done that. im not talking bout the handsworth incident, im talking in general now. sumtyms u need to show ppl love and sumtyms u need to giv them the sword. unless u know everything about the handsworth incident u shud not comment on it. i myself dont know so i dont comment on it. it seems to me that u are a blatant pacifist which is cool. but sikhi is not a pacifist religion. however it is 1 that shud show restraint.

the difference is those muslims he helped wernt evil ppl. they fought for wat they believed in. im not sayin the person that got stabbed in at the handsworth mela was evil im jus sayin that every situation is different. rupinder singh is an <banned word filter activated>, ppl on this forum shud kno this by now. hes a pacifist, he may as well be a buddist. (not that there is anything wrong wiv buddism. buddism is alot like sikhi. i say buddism cus they are similar to sikhs only pacists like rupinder singh *mod edited*) MOD NOTE : Please refrain from personal attacks