<br />Utter rubbish, a proper Kenya pagh is more stable than these India wale "jatt" paghs, they were worn in both world wars when the singhs in the British army didn't wear helmets so they are definetly Imcomparible to hats! Granted nowadays there is a version which is basically a hat because it's starched which is a joke but true Kenya pagh is fine<br /><br /><br />Thats strange. All my male relatives on both my mothers and fathers side, including grandfathers, great-grandfathers and great great grandfathers were in the British Army...all over the world,in places such as Hong Kong, Burma, Fiji etc...and every last one of them wore what you describe as 'jatt' style paghs. <img src='http://www.sikhsangat.com/public/style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' /> <br />Are you sure you're not confusing the proud Sikh soldiers that fought freely and bravely around the world...with the semi-indentured sikh labourers that were signed up and shipped to build the railways in east Africa ? Me thinks you are. <img src='http://www.sikhsangat.com/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /><br /><br /><br /><br />Intresting...I came across some intresting viewpoints, what do you lot think of this concept...not my own views just seeing what general consensus is..before I did some reading, I never quire considered this viewpoint....
Now were the Skhs who fought for the British army really what you call free and brave....or what some people would call traitors !
Speak to some Nihangs, they say most of the real Singhs died fighting against the British in the Anglo-Sikh wars and then in the freedom fighting movement afterwards...they consider the ones who joined the British army as traitors fighting for the enemy..