pavitarsk

..

You mean a proper Amrittary Sikh, surely? No point in becoming a Sikh if you haven't embraced the Teachings of the Sikh Gurus.

A Sikh is a person who either wears a turban, drinks and eats meat like no ones business or 'it' can be without a turban and does not drink or eat meat!

.

Good heavens!! This is a very impressive list of people you 'like' and 'don't like' even though they are not all politicians or even British!! What about Putin, Shinzo Abe, Desmond Tuttu, Geoffrey Chaucer and Charles Dickens? Where do they fit in, in your 'like and don't like' list? It would be interesting to know the answer, clever clogs!

It was totally out of order to speak to you this way. Sorry, won't happen again.

You are completely out of your mind. How are you going to achieve this without complete unanimity from every section of the Panth?

......

Sikhojaago, is not refuting this. She/he is laying huge emphasis on the discipline shaaster Vidya provides.

Globalisation has benefitted some countries not all.

The animals are regularly given antibiotics and hormones which still must be there when they are slaughtered for meat eaters.

Really, since when?

Globalisation of the world is not recent, why did no one complain earlier?

I went on one of the links you provided, came back to respond but notice you have deleted the remaining ones. I am not sure why?

Discipline goes hand in hand with shastra vidiya. It is important for all sikhs who have taken the Amrit to learn shastra vidiya in my opinion.

Then why are they teaching school children about Aliens, if it is that scary? I was watching The Alien Agenda by Simon Parkes 2015 on YouTube. After 28 minutes or more he is very clearly telling people what they are teaching young children regarding this! Surely, it can't be all that scary, can it? I am not going to post the link for the sake of keeping peace here on this forum. But, if anyone is interested they can just Google it by typing The Alien Agenda, Simon Parkes 2015(conspiracies). In fact, it can also be found in the same link posted by the OP.

. Even if they did, no one will take them seriously.

Very informative work of art.

m

...... No, I don't know which painting you are referring to. Besides, how do you know he was listening to classical music? Did the painting have a date and signature of the artist at the bottom? Can you describe the style, ambience, colours, mood, light, movement and general impression of this famous work of art a bit more? Was this painting trying to communicate a message of some kind to its viewers? What kind of feelings, if any, did the painting evoke within you? Was the Nihang Singh old, young, slim or fat? Did he look mysterious or enigmatic in any way? Did he appear charismatic in his countenance? Was it a very leafy, tall, fruit-bearing tree or was it just an ordinary tree? Did the tree look august in its appearance, as though it had been standing there for years and years? Was he sitting with a radio next to him with headphones on which made you think he was listening to classical music? Can you remember the make of the radio and the headphones so we can ascertain the exact date of this famous work? Let's assume for one minute that he was in fact listening to classical music, then the question arises, who was he listening to? Was he listening to Bach, Chopin, Vivaldi or just Mozart? Did the painting give you any hint as to the time of the day or not? Was this Nihang Singh sitting alone, did he have company or was he surrounded by many people but all strangers? Did he have a far away look in his eyes, as though he is day-dreaming? Were you able to see any birds' nests anywhere on the branches of this tree? If so,, what kind of birds were flying around, can you remember? Does the painting depict clear blue sky, sky with rainbow, sky with small grey clouds or just plain boring sky painted in one brush stroke with the sun missing altogether? I am totally puzzled as to which painting you are referring to? I wonder if it really exists?

I would have done so had I been there in 1947. I have nothing against highly respected Dr Ambekar. He was a well liked highly educated man with plenty of wisdom. He was a visionary.

The right time to ask for a separate state for the Sikhs was in 1947!

I know. Thanks anyway.

There is no fun in being colonized or conquered. In previous centuries nations were colonized with the help of armies, present day colonization is different. Nowadays, media plays a vital role when conquering peoples' minds and how they live. Conquering people's minds into submission or subjugation has far reaching and highly damaging results. For instance, people are mimicking the west without questioning or reasoning. They are losing their ethnic/national identities in trying to fit in with global/one identity, which is a sole creation of New World Order. Soon there will be one religion too to fit in with the NWO.

This is not true for every single Sikh man, might be for some. White people already know this, no need to keep repeating it.