sher-e-panjab

the reason i asked this question was because many ppl understand that due to hindu fundamentalists sikhs were attacked to avenge the death of indira. and thats how all the western countries see it however if the sikhs were just attacked upon for no reason, as many ppl say would have happened whether she was killed or not, this would have got india in a real bad position which they would not be able to control as the world would have seen that sikhs are being targetted for no reason at all

look back at the history im sure you will find many occasions, one that quickly springs to mind is when the muslims betrayed guru gobind singh ji, when they swore on quran that they will not attack the singhs as they leave. all they did was advise us, why would u listen to jinnah who was the cause of the partition, bcoz of whom many sacred shrines have been separated from punjab, bcoz of whom many sikhs died in the riots during partition yea that shows real bravery, 'we cant get to them bcoz they are protected', there is always a way IF u try, if we could get the likes of indira, lala jagat naryan, bachna, beanta, vadiya and more, y not these ppl.

yea bro sure, keep tellin urself that, pakistan would much rather harbour a few sikhs than be on the good side of UK n USA which are the 2 leading countries hmm i wonder why theyre bringing all these weapons with them, it surely isnt to the punish the dushts involved in the darbar sahib attack and delhi riots. i mean when was the last time heard any of the dushts being punised. y are the likes of sajjan kumar, tytler, brar, kps gill and much more walking free. why havent the khalitanis targetted these ppl. as for khalistan, there is no unity amongst the khalistani groups so who is going to fight for it, not long ago panjwar n wadhwa babbar had a fight at nankhana sahib, the ISYF is in 2 factions, the btf split up into 2 groups ages ago n more groups form n break up. if anything these groups should be joining each other and then fight for khalistan

in actual FACT it there were many sikhs who were for the british and there were many sikh sellouts. SO TELL ME Y THE <admin-profanity filter activated> ARE THEY HIDING IN PAKISTAN Y NOT BE OUT IN THE OPEN AND BE INVOLVED, ILL TELL U Y COZ THE MOVEMENT IS DEAD!! THEYRE JUS LIVIN IT UP WHILST INNOCENT ARE BEING SENT TO DIE FOR 'THE PANTH' SANT JI NEVER HIS HE WAS ALWAYS IN THE PUBLIC DOING PRACHAR AND TALKING ABOUT THE GOVT. jus cause the militants are hiding in pakistan and pakistan is indias enemy dont think they are safe there. if countries like the USA n UK put pressure on the countries to become more friendly and improve relations then guess what? first thing they will work on is to stop terrorism, therefore wadhwa babbar (on india most wanted list) as well as panjwar, rhode and bittu will soon be sold out to the indian govt.

had indira gandhi not been killed would the delhi riots still have happened, jus like to know what ppl think

theres actually 2 different versions of hawayein that are being distibuted, so u may have seen a different one from rest but i think it to a certain extent does have some truth ie. there WHERE so called khalistanis affiliated with ISI goin round robbing ppl, killing innocent ppl etc as shown in the film. and it also showed the good khalistanis who were out to kill those who were involved in the delhi riots

predator u r so gullible, ppl like u think pakistan is helping us, no theyre not, theyre creating more problems sending the khalistanis to attack india so that they get what they want without having to send their own ppl. as are the majority of sikhs in india. as for pakistan helping us, no country does anything without wanting something in return and what would pakistan like better than there to be a civil war in india

if ur theme is anti-war y do u want to make a play about sikhs in the war

i thought the prog was rather boring the joke about the french, english n punjabi language was hilarious tho

yea sure, theres 2 whiskeys being distilled in the same area but with different names :wub:

.the whiskey is called amrut, not amrit

Punjabi Blood does it again :wub:

thats not the 'indian view' its the truth, think to yourself wot does pakistan gain by helping us, why would they help us if they want nothing in return. yes but we were promised many things by gandhi n nehru, but who would u have trusted, gandhi who as many ppl thought 'got india independant' or jinnah who wanted to divide the country, who took half of punjab away from india and many historical places

i was watchin the olympics, womens volleyball (yes i was bored) n there was jatha of white singhs cheering for kazhikstan n the cameraman kept focusin on them whenever the team scored a point, that was good, 3 rows of :wub: )))) :nihungsmile: :e:

the programme was total rubbish, it was only 10-15mis based on 'grooming' rest was on other issues at the end of the day its the gorias own fault, saliya dont think of wot they doin then bring the whole communities name down

this is ridicilous, so what iif its called amrit, it in no way tries to go out of its way to offend sikhs does it, its not as if it has a singh on the bottle promoting it

does there have to be a reason for a sister to show love towards her brother. :| i dont think u understand wot rakhria is for, by wearing a rakhri it doesnt mean u need to take of your kara, its only for 1 day wot does a rakhri have to do with this

im pretty sure it was guru nanak dev ji's sister that tied a rakhri on him, and thats were itall started for 'us'

its on saintsoldiers: http://saintsoldiers.waheguroo.com/ss/audi...nth%20Niara.mp3

sikhi im not saying that we should hide away in a cave, u wrote: 'Either way you will died might as well take a few with you.' who are these few u want to take with u, innocent ppl who dont even have a clue y theyre going b killed? when u said fight for khalistan i just assumed u meant pick up an ak47 as thats what first comes 2 mind when u said 'fight'. its better to raise awareness and have more support than becoming one man armies n spreading terror. 'when everything fails pick up the ak47' well wot has been done, nothing has failed because we havent done anything so the there are still lots of options before we can go round with the ak47s. in fact its mostly western sikhs who want khalistan, if those in india really wanted it at least something may have happened by now, i mean even back in the 80s. what has been the khalistan movements biggest achievement?

yea sikhi thats a great suggestion!!! lets shed some more blood!!! :| :|

whats your point tho, we are not in the old days so it doesnt matter anymore, in u saying that i could say y do ppl come i cars, 'back in the days' cars were only for the rich, 'why do ppl bring cameras etc back in the days.....' whats wrong with that,, theyre still outside they dont enter the gurdwara with the horse, the dholis n bajay walay do they r> meaing what exactly??

kandola whats your point!!! u think jus because ppl come on a horse to get married thats y they end up getting divorced, so what if ppl have dholis, vajja valey, it happens outside they dont take it into the gurdwara n start playing do they. anyway ur only gonna get married once (if it lasts) so y not enjoy it

WOW! thas a great story

our singhs are so stupid, pakistan are only 'helping' us so that they can use us later on to get their kashmir independant