A Must Read

[Harmeet Singh]

http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/home/khal...november02.aspx

India's 'appointed' Prime minister Manmohan Singh insults the memory of the thousands of innocent Sikh victims of the state-supervised November 1984 anti-Sikh pogroms by placing a wreath on mass murderer HKL Bhagat's deathbed

The three synchronized bomb blasts in Delhi last Saturday which went off simultaniously have the fingerprints & footprints of Indian Intelligence agencies

Washington, D.C., Wednesday, November 02, 2005 - While the twenty five million strong Sikh nation is remembering, with sadness and deep anguish, the thousands of innocent Sikh men, women and children who were murdered between October 31 and and November 04, 1984, (during the state-sponsored and state-supervised India-wide mass killings which took place exactly twenty one years ago) India's appointed Prime minister Manmohan Singh (who wears a Sikh turban and claims he is a Sikh) publicly insulted the memory of those thousands of innocent Sikh victim's last Sunday - on October 30, 2005 - during a public funeral of a mass murderer in Delhi, India.

Lest we forget; an excellent, very moving and spine-chilling eye witness audio account of that week-long November 1984 state-sponsored pogrom, covering the bloody happenings in India's capital city Delhi, in which thousands of Sikhs were murdered by Hindu mobs rampaging under Police supervision, (narrated by a Punjabi writer, Ms. Ajeet Kaur, recorded under the auspices of the South Asia Literature programme of the U.S. Library of Congress, headlined 'November 1984',) can be heard by clicking at the following link: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/mbrs/master/salrp/07202.mp3) Or one can go down to the Gurdwara Shaheedan in Delhi where Sikh widows, of November 1984 carnage, walk down the narrow steps to a gurdwara basement gallery where walls are crammed with pictures of their loved ones lynched by mobs 21 years ago. At Gurdwara Shahidan in Delhi, the Sikh widows pray not just for the lost ones, or for justice, or rehabilitation, but for thousands of the unemployed, emotionally disturbed, second-generation survivors driven to drugs and crime who wander outside in clusters like zombies with glassy looks. For details read the very sad story of the forgotten Sikh victims of the November 1984 pogram, in todays Tribune newspaper, headlined, "After ’84 riots they are now fighting drugs". (www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051103/punjab1.htm#9)

Last Sunday, on October 30, 2005, 'poster-boy' Indian Prime minister Manmohan Singh bared his 'Quisling' soul, (and disgusted and angered every self-respecting Sikh) by personally going and placing a floral wreath on the death-bed of one of the main organizers of that November 1984 pogrom, the late H. K. L. Bhagat, the mass murderer who was among the few indicted by the wishy washy Nanavati Commission for allegedly instigating the anti-Sikh mass killings of November 1984 in Delhi. The English language has an expression for just this kind of wicked, 'in your eye', calculated rudeness which has been directed at every Sikh by PM Manmohan Singhs' evil action. It is called a 'studied insult'. Mr. Manmohan Singh has insulted the 25 million strong Sikh nation by honoring a thug whose hands are covered with the blood of thousands of innocent Sikh men women and children who were murdered in the November 1984 state-supervised pogrom in Delhi. A photograph of shameless Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh paying homage with flowers at the death-bed of that mass murderer of Sikhs, H. K. L. Bhagat, (who was a confidant of Rajiv Gandhi and his widow, Sonia Gandhi) has been published in the Jalandhar-based independent Punjabi newspaper Ajit, Indian occupied Punjab, on October 31, 2005, and can be seen by clicking at: www.ajitjalandhar.com/20051031/general.htm

Last Sunday's wicked behavior of 'Prime minister' Manmohan Singh - he did not feel any pangs of shame or guilt - when he honoured that mass murderer of the Sikhs HKL Bhagat reminds one of a line, written in 1711, by that great English satirist, and man of letters, Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) in one of his many books, 'Thoughts on various subjects'. It reads, "I never wonder to see men wicked, but I often wonder to see them not ashamed." Incidently, Jonathan Swift is renowned in South Asia for his 1726 masterpiece, 'Gullivers Travels'.

No wonder Mrs. Sonia Maino Gandhi, (the Italian widow of that mass murderer who ordered the November 1984 anti-Sikh pogroms Prime minister Rajiv Gandhi) appointed the submissive, cringing, crawling, poster-boy Manmohan Singh as Prime minister in May 2004 to ensure the continuity of the Nehru dynasty which has ruled squalidly India for over forty years since the British Colonials left the Indo/Pak/ Bangladesh subcontinent in 1947. Mr. Manmohan Singh, 71, a shameless glorified 'Babu' is supposed to secure the Indian Prime Minister's 'throne' till Sonia's polyglot unread son, the effiminiate 37 years old bachelor, Rahul Gandhi matures in politics. The boy, as every political observor is predicting, is going to eventually claim - 'democratically' - the Prime minister's chair from the corrupt mental midgets politicians who pass as India's ruling elite.

Readers will recollect that, over a year ago there were some misgivings and questions when, the Khalistan Calling of June 09, 2004, was headlined, "Sikhon` ko Dr. Manmohan Singh kay prime minister bunnay say kyaamila?" --- "What did the Sikhs gain from Mrs Sonia Gandhi's appointment of a Sikh, as Prime minister of India?"(www.khalistan-affairs.org/khalistancalling/2004/june09.aspx) Events are slowly proving the correctness of the year-old observation that Mr. Manmohan Singh is no Sikh-friendly 'Sikh' and is only a lackey of the Nehru dynasty.

We believe the vital interests of the Sikh Homeland of Punjab (like its river waters, SYL canal, future of Chandigarh, agricultural economy, Punjab's industrial development and issues like the import of natural Gas from Pakistan in exchange for river water et al.,) are in grave danger of being ignored during the tenure of a government led by a person like Manmohan Singh, in a country whose jingoistic Bania/Brahmin dominated ruling elite engages in economic exploitation and state sponsored terrorism as a matter of state policy to further its foreign policy goals. State terror is also employed to keep umpteen sub-nations like the Nagas, Sikhs, Kashmiris, Mizos et al., subservient. Arranging synchronized bomb blasts in neighboring countries (a la the over seven hundred synchronized bomb blasts in Bangladesh in one day in August 2005) or sending terrorists like Sarabjit Singh to blast bombs among civillians in Pakistan or orchestrating communal massacres, like the 2002 Gujarat massacres of Muslims, are routine matters for morally repugnant Indian intelligence operatives. Remember the Chithisinghpura massacre of innocent Kashmiri Sikhs villagers orchestrated by Indian Intelligence Agencies to synchronize with President Clinton's state visit to India or the phony December 2001 attack on the Indian parliament, a copy cat of the September 11, 2001 New York terrorist attacks on the World Trade towers or the recent sham armed attack on the destroyed Babri mosque site in U.P. to rake up the Ram Mandir communal issue again?

The timing and modus operandi of last Saturdays three synchronized bomb blasts in Delhi, which were tailored to India's current policies on Kashmir, point a finger at Indian Intelligence. The blasts were a typical handicraft of Indian operatives because they pass the famous 'Duck test.' When it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck and looks like a duck, it is a duck! Whenever India has engaged in 'dramas' like this in the past (like when Indian agencies murdered dozens of Kashmiri Sikhs in Chattisinghpura, in Indian-held Kashmir, during President Clinton's state visit to India) it does a number of things - force of habit. First among them is that an appeal for calm is issued, directed at the unread Indian masses, by the head of the government and it is always in English to impress the international community. This appeal is usually followed by an ugly incident involving Pakistani diplomats in Delhi. (www.rediff.com/news/2005/nov/03staff.htm) That is followed by a street protest, outside the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi, led by that notorious Rent-A-Sikh Manjinderpal Singh Bitta, (www.ajitjalandhar.com/20051031/general.htm) President of the so-called All India Anti-Terrorist Front. This is followed by a telephoned claim by some unknown Kashmiri organization claiming responsibility for the ghastly event. (http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/nov/03dblast4.htm) All the above actions/reactions were repeated this week in India.

According to our sources in India, the rulers in Delhi are having second thoughts on the Indo/Pak agreement reached under International (Read U.S.) pressure, on General Musharraf's daring suggestion, to open five points along the Kashmir Ceasefire Line ostensibly to provide better access for relief workers to earthquake victims on both sides. This open border at five points, between Indian & Pakistani held parts of disputed Kashmir, is a public relations trump card played by the Pakistani President which does not suite India at all. The rulers in Delhi know that the openings will encourage aspirations for an independent multi-ethnic Kashmir for which a strong lobby is steadily gaining ground in Pakistan as well as India. That is why Indian officials were quick to claim that there is evidence (all of them from Indian Prime minister Manmohan Singh downwards speak ONLY in English when their operatives have arranged a synchronized terrorist event or bomb blast) that 'foreign militants were involved in Saturday's three synchronized bomb attacks in Delhi', in which at least 62 people are reported to have died. There is no evidence of any kind that this is so! (http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/south_asia/4393532.stm)

It is quite possible that tomorrow, just before the SAARC regional meeting (which is being held in Dacca, Bangladesh, in a few days) India may uncover evidence of a Bangladeshi hand in the three Delhi bomb blasts to put that country on the defensive. Day after tomorrow Delhi might claim, if it suits them at that point in time, that a Sikh group was responsible for the bomb blasts which seem to be synchronized with the twenty first anniversary of the November 1984 anti/Sikh Delhi pogrom. (www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051103/main2.htm#2) All these options are in-house advantages for a country like India, which sponsors state terrorism (including the murder of its own citizens) inside the country as well outside