Harmeet Singh

Caste system and its hatred is a result of racism that happened as fair skinned people met the Black people of Indian subcontinent known as Untouchables or Dalits during various invasions. The fair skinned Aryans occupied the upper spots and made Blacks as Shuras(slaves) and 5th ones known as the outcasts or untouchables. Watch this video

Dear mandeepraina, You can read Gandhi's own words of contempt against Guru Gobind Singh in Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi published by the Indian Government here at http://www.gandhiserve.org/cwmg/VOL031.PDF Go to page 142 Here he has to say On Guru Gobind Singh, the 10th Sikh Guru, along with George Washington, Garibaldi and Lenin “By test of the theory of non-violence, I do not hesitate to say that it is highly likely that had I lived as their contemporary and in the respective countries, I would have called every one of them a misguided patriot, even though a successful and brave warriors” Guru Gobind Singh was neither an Indian patriot nor a misguided person. Gandhi was using his racial politics to ridicule Guru Gobind Singh. You may think Gandhi was not a bad person but this assertion is generally given by those people who haven't been victims of his racial politics or are not aware of facts on Gandhi. The Dalits and Sikhs have been direct victims of Gandhi's racial and ethnic politics. When Mohammad Ali Jinnah in 1946 wanted to form a coalition government with Congress in United India, Gandhi refused to accept the demand of Jinnah which would have given Muslims a electoral representation within a united India. Jinnah therefore had to restore to the demand of Pakistan. A mere acceptance by Gandhi of the Muslim demand would have prevented millions of people from massacres and uprooting. This Mahatma could have considered the value of humans more than a demand raised by Jinnah but alas, he cared less about Punjab for Sikhs over having a Hindu dominated India and Hindu dominated Indian parliament.

Please read the following article The Malaise of Jat Consciousness Jattpuna within Sikhs http://worldsikhnews.com/13%20August%20200...nsciousness.htm The Jat’s democratic or fraternal spirit has been confined mainly to his own community. He has never brooked any non-Jat in the village as the owner of land. This shows a congenital lack of democratic spirit. His self-esteem, a distinct feature of his character, is offset by his yearnings gained through Manu’s influence. He revels in denigrating and humiliating low caste people. His behaviour, in general, makes him no different from the arrogant members of the so-called swarna castes.

This video starts with the practice of Untouchability amongst Hindus and then shows the practice of Apartheid in the Sikh Gurudwaras. How Sikhs have different places to stand in the same Gurudwaras depending upon their caste and the violence against the Sikhs. It also shows how Sikhs are living in the state of denial when they say there is no apartheid in Gurudwaras. This whole series is an eye opener and spine chilling for Sikhs. Please watch Part 6 and 7. Whole Series: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_quer...mp;search_type= Part 6 Part 7

KTS Tulsi http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/dec/01inter.htm No Need Of Sikh Marriage Act: Tulsi http://www.sikhsangat.org/news/publish/asi...si_120907.shtml

The reason why many eulogize Bhagat Singh is because they want Sikhs to identify themselves with being like Bhagat Singh i.e. to say being an Indian first than Sikh. Didn't Bhagat Singh cut his hair for his "desh"?How was this action as per Sikhi, he was a Desh Bhagat. He was an Atheist,Arya samajist and a Marxist. Is that Sikhi? Rest of what you want to assume lies on wobbly imagination without any basis of facts. He may have been a shaheed but not for Sikhs. It is almost like saying just because Buta Singh died for his Muslim love, Sikhs should consider him a great Shaheed of Love.

I don't think Bhagat Singh can be a Shaheed. His actions were not influenced by Sikhi but by Marxism.

This issue is being singled out due to anti-Muslim feeling of some Sikhs. I don't see them having there placards when Sikhs girls marry Hindu guys. I along with many have seen Sikh families willing marrying there girls in Hindu households. I think some people are over reacting to this situation in UK. Of course preying nature of these Muslim men is an issue but lets also understand that we should not sideline this issue as a single entity. It is a part of wider phenomenon of illiteracy about Sikhi amongst Sikhs that is hurting them from all sides.

The post has very strong points indeed. What we can clearly see is- there was no active participation of Gurus in celebrating Diwali. Gurus celebrated whole life not a DAY. I don't see any spiritual significance of lighting up Darbar Sahib and Homes along with all the festivities including Mathaiya and other stuff. It can't be a Sikh concept. It more looks like a "Rangeen Tamasha" other than the point of Gurbani that asks for Soch and Vichaar

Why do we give so much attention to such folks after all there motive in the end is to make us feel desperate. Just let them show their own desperation

I am unable to install Gurmukhi fonts on win Vista. Can someone help?

http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/home/pres...june7,2007.aspx Divide and rule’ subversive anti-Sikh activities of Indian diplomatic missions condemned June 07, 2007 Washington DC, Friday, June 07 2007: In a Press Statement issued here today, Dr. Amarjit Singh, Director of the Washington-based Khalistan Affairs Center, condemned the subversive activities of Indian diplomatic missions abroad in general and the Indian Consulate General in Vancouver (BC) in particular, for spreading dezinformatsiya which maligns the peaceful, law-abiding diaspora Sikh communities and the independent Punjabi print media located abroad. The statement mentioned a recent episode in Canada, which stands out, in which, one Umendra Singh, planted a mischievous story on the website of VANCOUVER 24 HOURS, on 04 June, 2007, falsely claiming that a commentary published in the Surrey-based Punjab Guardian had called for the destruction of a 16th century Hindu temple in Amritsar. Within a few hours the false story went round the world. The VANCOUVER 24 HOURS reporter did not realize two facts. Firstly, that there is no 16th century Hindu temple in Amritsar. Secondly, Sikhs respect ALL religions and are not in the Temple or Mosque or Church destroying business. Demolishing mosques, like the 16th century Babri, comes in the domain of the Indian right wing, Neo-Nazi, fascist, Hindutawa elements. Dr. Amarjit Singh’s statement concluded by reproducing a protest letter written to the management of VANCOUVER 24 HOURS which is appended below:

Durgiana Mandir must be preserved as an important piece of history of copycating. PS The temple was built in 1920s not in 16th century.

This would be a brilliant excuse by Apologists for softness on cruelty.

"Mother" Teresa's work was based essentially to convert people to the faith of Catholicism.