Jump to content

Lectureship In The Study Of Religions (Contemporary South Asian Religions) Lectureship In The Study Of Religions (Contemporary South Asian Religions)


Recommended Posts

I've been asked to forward the following vacancy to any apnay who may be eligible to apply (not many I imagine). Please alert anyone who might be interested.

Lectureship in the Study of Religions (Contemporary South Asian Religions)

Job Posted: 19 Apr 2011

Closing Date for Applications: 27 May 2011

College: College of Arts, Celtic Studies & Social Sciences

Contract Type: Fixed Term Whole-Time

Job Type: Academic

Salary: €31,821 – €51,270 [new entrants 2011]

Applications from suitably qualified candidates are invited for the post of Lecturer in the Study of Religions with research and teaching expertise in contemporary (19th-21st century) South Asian religions. This is a three year fixed term post.

This is a unique opportunity to contribute to the development of Ireland’s first academic unit devoted to the multidisciplinary, cross-cultural academic study of religions. We are looking for a highly qualified and motivated lecturer who will contribute to the discipline’s excellent research profile and draw local and international students at all levels to the study of religions at UCC. The discipline at UCC is expected to grow substantially over the next 10 years.

‘South Asian religions’ should be understood in its broadest sense. The intention is that the appointment of a specialist in South Asian religions will considerably extend the fields of teaching and research supervision available at UCC, rather than duplicate existing areas. Current staff profiles including research and teaching interests can be found at http://www.ucc.ie/en/studyofreligions/Staff/

Essential criteria include a relevant (completed) PhD, significant research achievement in contemporary South Asian religions in the context of the academic study of religions, ability to teach across the range of South Asian religions and to lead, or contribute substantially to, teaching on other topics (examples might be religion and: gender, law, or politics) in the study of religions.

The post is available from 1 September 2011 or at a date to be agreed.

Interviews for this post are expected to be held on 11 July 2011.

Salary scale: €31,821 – €51,270 [new entrants 2011]

More details @ http://www.ucc.ie/en/hr/vacancies/academic/full-details-121139-en.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just a poor boy from a poor family as the song goes.

One day, God willing, I'll do a PhD but currently I'm probably too dense for such a position and certainly not qualified.

Gives me something to aim for I guess.

Would be nice if we had one of our more independent spirited brothers/sisters in the role though. This would be the ideal platform to address some of the Anglocentric representations (read skews) of the faith and our itihaas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use