Jump to content

Anandpur Sahib Heritage Complex To Be Opened Without Pm


Azaad
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Punjab Congress has managed to persuade Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to give the inauguration of the prestigious Khalsa Heritage Complex (KHC) at Anandpur Sahib a skip.

However, unperturbed by the Prime Minister declining his invitation; state Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal has announced that the Punjab Government will go ahead with the inauguration without the Prime Minister.

The past few weeks have seen a tug-of-war between the ruling SAD-BJP alliance and the Congress over the Prime Minister’s visit to Punjab on the invitation of Parkash Singh Badal. The Prime Minister was formally invited by Badal to inaugurate the KHC and to lay the foundation stone of the Mohali international airport. The Congress asked the Prime Minister to decline the invitation claiming that it would have an adverse impact on the party’s prospects in the next General Election to be held in February next year.

Badal today disclosed that in a letter, the Prime Minister had expressed his inability to come to Punjab on November 25 on account of his proposed foreign visit and Parliament session. Badal, however, added that the inauguration of the KHC and the laying of the foundation stone of the terminal of the Mohali international airport would be done as per schedule on November 25, sans the Prime Minister.

Badal said it was unfortunate that the Congress high command, AICC president Sonia Gandhi and PPCC president Amarinder Singh had dissuaded the Prime Minister from coming to Punjab for these prestigious projects for the sake of cheap politics. He said Sonia Gandhi and Amarinder Singh should not forget that Manmohan Singh was not the Prime Minister of the Congress party, but of the entire country.

Criticising Amarinder Singh for writing a letter to the Prime Minster requesting him to not to come for the purpose, Badal said, “By indulging in cheap politics, Amarinder Singh has put a blot on democratic norms. It is unfortunate that Amarinder Singh was making misleading statements like the KHC was inaugurated way back in 2006.” How it could be inaugurated in 2006, when it was not completed at that time, he asked.

Although the Congress has been successful in stalling the Prime Minister’s visit to Punjab on the invitation of the SAD-BJP government, this has the potential of snowballing into a major issue during the next General Election. The SAD-BJP has always indulged in Centre-bashing, claiming discrimination at the hands of the Centre, but the Congress has been saying that the UPA government has given much more financial assistance to Punjab as compared to any previous Central Government.

While the Akalis are now alleging, perhaps rightly, that by this move, the Prime Minister’s status has been reduced to a party leader from a national leader. Some Congress leaders like Jagmeet Brar and Rajinder Kaur Bhattal, also feel the Prime Minister should have come to Punjab and let the people know what the Centre had done for the state.

The bad blood generated over the issue is likely to lead the Akalis restart the debate about vesting more powers with the states and having a federal setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use