Jump to content

H4RPAL

Members
  • Posts

    830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by H4RPAL

  1. http://kathaa.waheguroo.com/index.wn?viewCat=582 Jap Jee Sahib Katha
  2. We try to avoid American shows here.
  3. Harsh????? Where???- you're the harsh one with these accusations. Meanie!!
  4. The number was based on various interpretaions of phenomena I observed during the course of this thread. My original estimate of 50-50 was PROVED beyond doubt to be flawed by the mathmetician known as "Po$h Jatti", and hence, I had to undertake new methodology. Basically, i couldn't admit she was right, so just took 5% off her figure, and presented taht as factual, to which she foolishly agreed. Also, in response to her post, yep- I'm experienced- I wait all year for mela time to go and harass girls ( I usually find I have enough time to harass each one twice, problems only arise when the same girls visit more tahn one mela, and thus get annoyed with the prolonged harassment). I'm gonna write a book soon on how to harass more efficiently, so watch this space.
  5. whoa, now we're getting mathematical! I say no more than 75% girls fault
  6. I don't think you can totally say its the girls fault in such a case- its always 50-50
  7. so, someone explain the difference to me....
  8. You ask a lot about the blood- which blood is it you reffer to? The blood in pictures and paintings taht you have seen?? These paintings are more likely tahn the Gurus words not to be accurate, so if you can have faith in these recently painted pictures, it si not too much to ask to have faith in Guru Ji's words too. Guru Ji asked for the head of a Sikh, and thus a head of a Sikh was what he took. The head of a goat, or any other farm animal would not have been an adequate repalcement,a s taht is not what was asked for. If Guru Ji did not take the heads of the pyare, how then could they have found the courage to ask Guru Ji what he woudl give for this same Amrit they had given their haeds for?
  9. How do girls reply? If they firmly told them to get lost, they'd soon get the picture and have to change their ways
  10. Nope, tahts exactly what I wanted to know funilly enough. Cuttinga long story short, thsi is my view of the events of Vaisakhi 1699. Guru Gobind Singh Ji did indeed cut the heads of the panj pyare as stated in your source, and then furthermore when returning the heads to the bodies, did so in a manner in which the 'wrong' head was given to the 'wrong' body. In this way, sucha practice eradicated any basis for caste discrimination. As the pyare were of different castes, and had now been given different bodies for their heads, ina manner this showed how all Khalsa were equal, and how there should be no discrimination. Hence the blood on the sword was indeed from the heads of the pyare. When Guru Gobind Singh Ji asked for heads of Sikhs, why would he have settled for the heads of goats, deer etc? If the Guru was true, he would have been true to his word. Please feel free to ask nmore if I have done a rubbish job in explaining.
  11. What is the story to which you would like to add an understanding of the blood ? Please tell us what your beliefs about the events are, as the actual story has not been narrated on this thread, and then I think people will be happy to answer with respect to that.
  12. Were you being sarcastic? 93694[/snapback] i think he was being serious u know 93715[/snapback] Thats what I feared
  13. WJKK, WJKF I hope you've got a LOT of free time, because your gonna need it now. Once you start here, you can't stop.
  14. ....said Kumi as he ran home crying....then suddenly, on the way home, he saw a Nihang with a bazooka and commented "modaaa rasssss".......
  15. No, Surely not!!! Where do all these insightful replies come from then? Have you hired a ghost-writer or something?
  16. ...until he realsises he forgot to put his dentures in this morning.....
  17. SORRRRRRRRRY! Darn tempramental artists!
  18. what, you didn't know you found it funny?
  19. nah, neck upwards doesn't work for me- neck downwards will be fine. I'll stop now- you can have this one
  20. "hehehhehe" in your first post
  21. Excellent fabrication by the author- truly an imaginative account. At least he's tried to put the effort in to be as incorrect as humanly possible. A great effort at distorting history A+++++
  22. At least I didn't laugh at her like you did!
  23. Kumi, you ever thought about becoming a historian?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use