genie

I enjoyed the show it probably had the highest viewing figures for a few years, judging just by the number of online viewers on their website was around 800+ mark alone. But glad sikh youth uk have caught these muslim guys in the act targeting potential sikh girls online. There is a huge problem in schools, colleges, universities, workplaces and especially on social media these guys targeting non-muslim girls on twitter, instagram and facebook. Also linking the cases of Sikh girls groomed for converting to islam and who then becoming muslim extremists sending funds to isis or becoming jihadi brides is excellent work. This will be important in banging heads in government and authorities how muslims operate first they groom your young females (11-35 child bearing age) especially females (who are easy, vulnerable and potential mothers to new generation of kids). I been posting topics for years of how demographics are key to why muslim guys target non-muslim females they want to reduce and destroy our populations by soft/sexual/love jihad. Only now things are being taken seriously by non-muslim organisations and even right thinking muslims themselves realising there is a huge problem of religiously/racially motivated sexual crimes against non-muslims in their community.

At first it seemed like a straight forward case of violent armed home robbery perhaps targeted cos of the expensive range rover in the drive way? or racially targeted because they are asian/indian/sikh? But when you look at the video again you can see the first guy using keys to get into the house and also one of the attackers is a woman who has masked but you can tell with her legs and body frame its a female. So it seems like a targeted attack someone who knows this family personally perhaps ex-partner/ex-wife maybe? Or ex-tenets targeting the landlord......Just a theory and observation

And more importantly what does Sikhi have to say about this? For e.g why do young kids get cancer and die early who haven't even seen life proper? Why do innocents get attacked and killed around the world? In 1 on 1 debates over the years I've asked many abrahamic believers to explain from their point of view why it happens and they tend to just brush it off as its "God' testing us" or "God testing them (the victim)". That explanation doesn't wash with me and sounds barbaric and cruel to put innocent souls through this. Especially as that implies abrahamic God isn't treating every soul equally and chooses who is to be treated worse and better and differently from birth. While abrahamics often say their God is just God and doesn't discriminate against believers yet many in birth are already dealt a worse card than their counterparts not even given a chance to fulfill their potential to prove their devotion or rejection of their God and their belief system.

There's been quite a few "sikh" rappers around but not quite hit the western mainstream music scene. There's one who is quite promising though who was born in forest gate, east london UK and goes by the nick of "steel banglez" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel_Banglez https://www.channel4.com/news/steel-banglez-interview-on-the-origins-of-a-new-british-sound I wouldn't call him a "sikh rapper" but a music rapper of Sikh faith and origin. As he isn't preaching about Sikhi culture/religion but about western lifestyle (hitting clubs, getting with women, drinking,etc)

Jugraj had a charismatic personality basics of sikhi (BoS) was his brainchild, his baby, his brand, his product. He was a mona Sikh who used to drank alcohol in his younger years, who went to oxford uni getting a first, who enlisted into the british army as a soldier, who had a good paying job in the city and eventually left it all when converted to become amritdhari Sikh and started to help others get into Sikhi. He was also controversial and courageous tackling taboo subjects and muslim/christian abrahmic dawah preachers in the streets. When you look at the other parchariks of BoS they are very boring and lack that energy, passion and charisma they also dont really have a story to tell. Their backgrounds are bland apart from a few like jagmeet singh who was a mona or a hindu punjabi? (forgot which one) who converted to Sikhi and now is a passionate amritdhari Sikh. Basics of Sikhi needs hard hitting controversial figure heads that tackles the taboos of muslims grooming sikh females, of Sikh depopulation, solutions to convert muslims to Sikh, tackle Sikh divorce rate, unrealistic expectations of young spolit Sikh females, the evils of feminism, sikh guys not behaving like superior confident guys but as low life drunk dorks and embarrassing clowns. They wont touch these subjects cos they are sacred of ruffling feathers. Too many are politically correct hippy liberal types who preach peace and love which is great but bores the living daylights of people who know the Guru's also taught Sikhs to preach truth to majority and power even if its bitter, to fight physically in order to defend themselves against physical aggressors. Yet the preachers will not talk about this for fear of offending or breaking some unjust man made politically correct recent law.

Mean while very low IQ left wing fake Sikh idiots/clowns are holding anti-sikh iftari parties in Gurdwaray like good dhimmi's (subjudgated non-muslims). Sikh leadership (akal takht jathedhar, sgpc, sant samaj, SAD Badal group, captain amrindar singh, damdamhi taksal,etc) are hiding like scared rats and mice and ostriches head in sand. Supposed Sikh charities like Khalsa Aid is busy helping non-sikhs Africans, syrian muslims, Bosnian muslims and royhingya muslims to survive and grow in number while Khalsa Aid chose to ignore the suffering of fellow Sikhs around the world being persecuted by muslims. Guru Gobind Singh Ji stated the day the Khalsa does not behave like the Khalsa (as per the 52 commandments) he will withdraw his blessings and support from it. Question is where is the Khalsa? It's embarrassing.....

Abrahmics have got the formula right for a community to survive in a hostile world you need to be being selfish. The right wing ashkhanazi Jews in particular are very sly cabal only promoting their own minded jews in top positions in media, finance and politics amoung other industries. We can witness this is in action right now as a huge fake media storm attacking labour party in the UK and its leader jeremy corbyn when he and his friends spoke out against jewish extremism and Israel terrorism against Palestinian civilians. The Jews in the UK are less in number than Sikhs yet hold significant power to slience their critics and the majority christian population into submission. Its amazing to watch how they operate and how much power their wield trying to convenience the general public they dont yet giving the game away when they come out trying to silence free speech against their jewish/israeli extremism. Their abahramic cousins the muslims are also similarly inclined only looking out for their own secterian muslim agenda everyone else can go screw themselves. The Christians they seem to have gone on a tangent heading towards oblivion if you see their demographics in the west and church attendances are at an all time record low only the well meaning but low IQ people seem to be interested in Christianity. The higher IQ educated whites seem to be less interested in abrahmic nonsense and more interested in eastern faiths or hedonist atheism as their ideologies of choice. Left wing fake sikh clowns and idiots are too nice for their own good and then wonder why their sisters and daughters get groomed and sexually abused or get into inter-faith relationships producing no Sikhs for the next generation as a net result. And correct formula that Sikhs should adopt is what the Sikhs of the past did, fierce against non-Sikh attackers/aggressors and loving, kind and supportive to their follow Sikhs at the moment its the opposite cos of left wing idiots and their stupid anti-sikh brain dead ideology. We see incidents in afghanistan, pakistan and kashmir .... Sikhs getting victimsed and Sikhs instead of forming armed battlions to take on the aggressors are instead holding peaceful protests for a day or so then go back to sleep until the next incident happens. If the anti-sikh cancer is not attacked it only grows and emboldens to attack further but low IQ left wing sikhs do not see this as they are deaf dumb and blind to their own communities suffering and the scared Sikh leadships of today are impotent to do anything.

When we look back at our history the Sikh community only were able to achieve great victories those who tried to exterminate us by being unified and feeding into a pot that helped the community become self sufficient and then the goal of creating a commonwealth of Sikh populated area's of influence. What we have nowadays is Sikhs busy trying to further their own selfish interests, trying to accumulate their own financial needs instead and putting each other down of looking at the bigger picture of community progressing to a strong position so that population grows instead of it declining and suffering as see it with Sikhs in islamic dominated hell holes of afghanistan, pakistan and kashmir and now even punjab our population is not the healthy majority it used to be. I see some Sikhs with huge houses, latest flashy cars some even helping build big beautifully decorated gurdwara's and it reminds me of Sikhs of the past. They were rich, they were royals, business or land owners they spent huge monies one expensive personal goods and also build gurdwara's all over the place. Then the british east india company army came along and the Sikh empire was no more and then 1947 happened and those huge numerous beautiful gurdwara's were destroyed by musilms or converted into masjids or pakistani govt buildings. The Sikhs should have spent their resources on creating a huge population by either birth rate or converting the muslims and other masses to Sikhi instead of building gurdwara's because its the people that matter not the buildings they can be destroyed or converted by enemies.

Empire of the Sikhs Date: 12 July 2018Time: 10:30 AM Finishes: 23 September 2018Time: 5:00 PM Venue: Brunei Gallery Room: Exhibition Rooms Type of Event: Exhibition A MAJOR EXHIBITION IN LONDON THIS SUMMER Over 100 dazzling artworks and objects tell the story of a cosmopolitan empire that almost ended British rule in India This summer heralds a major exhibition telling the story of the last great native kingdom which challenged the British for supremacy of the Indian subcontinent. ‘Empire of the Sikhs’ will be on view at the Brunei Gallery, SOAS from 12 July to 23 September 2018. The Sikh Empire (1799–1849), which spanned much of modern day Pakistan and northwest India, was forged by the ‘Napoleon of the East’ Maharaja Ranjit Singh (1780–1839)who became known as Sher-e-Punjab, the Lion of Punjab, over his forty-year reign. Maharaja Ranjit Singh established a powerful military meritocracy that included many European officers. His empire offered a crucial buffer state between the British and incursions via the Khyber Pass. The one-eyed king was a trusted ally of the British but also a potentially formidable opponent. The inevitable clash with the British came in the form of two bitterly fought Anglo-Sikh Wars (1845–46, 1848–49) in which British pre-eminence hung in the balance as they came within hours of a total surrender. But through treachery, victory was turned into defeat for the Sikhs whose territories, treasury and fighting men became incorporated into British dominion. A source of great interest to British visitors to the Sikh royal court prior to annexation was the Koh-i-Noordiamond, which was wrested from Afghan hands in 1813. The fabled jewel was eventually presented to Queen Victoria on 3 July 1850 in the armlet that Ranjit Singh had specially made for it. Fitted with a rock crystal replica of the original, uncut Koh-i-Noor, it is now preserved as part of the Royal Collection and will be one of the highlights on display along with a stunning array of over 100 objects and works of art from leading private and public collections. Among them will be glittering jewellery and weaponry from the Sikh Empire including personal items that belonged to Maharaja Ranjit Singh and the most famous of his thirty ‘official’ wives, Maharani Jind Kaur. They were the parents of the deposed boy-king Maharaja Duleep Singh and grandparents to prominent suffragette (and goddaughter to Queen Victoria), Princess Sophia Duleep Singh.

Interesting how the Indian establishment and British since 1947 have been plotting away to this very day to stop Sikhs getting their own freedom. In the article it says congress nehru was the very first one to use the scare tactic of khalistan to prompt the british into action against allowing Pakistan. Yet when the British allowed for pakistan to be created (because of secret deal between freemasons muhammad ali jinnah and winston churchill) and nehru reluctantly agreed to it then the cowardly scheming paedophile hindu brahmin beast nehru prompted the british imperialists to use the british Indian army border force units to attack the anti partition Sikh military generals, the Sikh raja's and sikh militant jatha's fighting for their homes, people, religious sites and homeland of Punjab not being divided when pakistan was announced to be created.

Fear of Khalistan: India demands UK to disallow Social Justice meet News Desk - July 13, 2018 News Analysis | India has issued a demarche to the UK protesting a meeting convened in London by separatist organization Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) next month. The meeting has been called with an intention to shape the ‘Referendum 2020’ campaign in August that seeks a separate Khalistan and “independence of Punjab”. This wholesale slaughter, which led to the deaths of many Sikhs including entire families, has been widely condemned by human rights activists and has been designated as genocide by the California State Assembly. “We have taken up the matter with the UK government. We have also issued a demarche and we expect that the UK government does not allow any such group to use its country whose intention is to spread hate and which can affect our bilateral ties. “We have told them the intention of the event is the same,” the ministry of external affairs spokesperson said. He was responding to a question on what action has India taken to stop the meeting. Mr. Kumar said the ties of the Sikh community residing in the UK and other parts of the world are good with India. “Their ties, with the country they reside in, are also good. As far as the small groups are concerned, they are fringe elements and their job is to spread hate and communal disharmony,” he said. The SFJ has also offered to sponsor Punjabi youths as well as political activists to take part in the gathering next month. Read more: India fumes over pro-Khalistan posters in Pakistan The specter of a Sikh State in the form of Khalistan has scared New Delhi since India’s creation in 1947. The Khalistan Movement is a Sikh nationalist movement that wants to create an independent state for Sikh people, via peaceful struggle, inside the current North-Western Republic of India. An ignored aspect is that the concept of an independent Sikh state was originally floated by none other than Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru in the pre-independence period through a Sikh leader whose ear he had at that time. Although the term had popped up occasionally as a non-serious slogan by stray unrepresentative voices during the period leading up to the partition of the country into India and Pakistan, the concept was first given formal shape and the term Sikh Home Land first used by Master Tara Singh at Nehru’s behest as a “counterblast to Jinnah’s demand for an independent Muslim state, Pakistan. In other words, the demand for Khalistan was first raised to counter and kill the demand for Pakistan. Thus, ironically, Khalistan was invented to preserve India’s unity and integrity, and not to break it. It was used to frighten the British away from the idea of Pakistan. The Sikhs as a separate nation before British rule chose to join India by choice on promises made by Nehru. The Independence of India was not a joyful event for Sikhs and the scars of partition left Sikhs in a lot of discontentment with regard to their traditional lands being lost to Pakistan and truncated Eastern Punjab being dominated by a non-Punjabi speaking majority. These grievances were further aggravated by u turn of Nehru on promises made to the Sikh community. Further on, Indira Gandhi tried to prop up Deras of Nirankaris to counter the Sikh’s growing political clout. Nirankari Gurus desecrated the Sikh scriptures and were allowed to do it under police protection. In a major altercation, 8 Sikhs were murdered by Nirankaris while they were protesting the desecration. This was the incident that created a call for taking up arms against the Nirankaris, and thereof against the government if it protected them. The SFJ has also offered to sponsor Punjabi youths as well as political activists to take part in the gathering next month. Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale emerged as the voice of Sikhs, over-ruling the pro-State leaders like Longowal. Bhindrawale declared himself as the protector and arbiter of Sikh rights and acquired arms. A list of attacks attributed to Bhindranwale by the government but never substantiated by proof finally gave New Delhi the excuse to impose an emergency in October 1983. In June 1984, an event would happen that would ignite the flame for Khalistan. The assault on Darbar Sahib, popularly known as the Golden Temple (the holiest of Sikh temples) by the Indian military forces using tanks and artillery – known as Operation Blue Star was conducted in order to evict a group of armed pro-Khalistan activists from the temple – a claim that remains controversial to this day with prominent politicians like Subramanian Swamy asserting that this was a disinformation campaign to legitimize the attack. Read more: Khalistan factor defined Trudeau visit to India According to the Indian Army, 136 army personnel were killed and 249 injured. In all, 493 people in the complex were killed including Bhindranwale and 86 injured; the government report also mentions that 1600 people were unaccounted for, though it does not state what fraction were killed or injured. Unofficial figures go well into the thousands. Massive human right violations by Indian Army personnel took place like gunning down of prisoners and burning & looting of the Sikh Reference Library. Retaliation by some Sikhs came in the way of the assassination of Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards, Satwant Singh and Beant Singh. This act triggered the so-called anti-Sikh riots of 1984, which has been reported to be a planned pogrom by the Congress against the Sikhs. This wholesale slaughter, which led to the deaths of many Sikhs including entire families, has been widely condemned by human rights activists and has been designated as genocide by the California State Assembly. The army occupation of Punjab which followed Operation Blue Star was highly detrimental to the Sikhs. Mass human rights violations like torture, extrajudicial murders, rapes, illegal detentions, forced disappearances were inflicted upon the Sikh community by the Indian authorities to subdue resistance. Sikh groups resisted through an armed insurgency, which carried on for decades. India has been unable to suppress the demands of a separate Sikh state by both force and greed. In order to demean the struggle for Khalistan it often uses the foreign boogeyman as a tool for disinformation. https://www.globalvillagespace.com/fear-of-khalistan-india-demands-uk-to-disallow-social-justice-meet/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/local-residents-and-mosque-helped-pakistan-sikh-to-spend-night/articleshow/64949151.cms

Newly released secret documents that have been ordered to be released by uk courts have shown and proved the british government under margret thatcher had deep root suspected conspiracy of genocide against sikhs in india and showed they tried to suppress the British Sikhs and their human rights of holding demonstrations against the genocide that was occurring against their community in india in 1980s. While they were lecturing countries with poor human rights records aboard like iranian regime they were busy trying to find ways to suppress the Sikh rights to protect in the UK, it is even suspected they had paid fake sikh punjabi agents of the british police intelligence unit ready to cause trouble in these demonstrations so that action could be taken to stop them from being held british establishment (profiteers from murders and human rights abusers aboard the ruling class, intelligence agents, the mainstream media like bbc and the military and British puppet politicians) were in cahoots with Indian establishment because of beneficial trade deals especially the arms trade industry worth £5 billion. Thatcher was also exposed as a racist who funded and aided he national front leading to southall riots against Sikhs there in 1980s.... it was a deep rooted conspiracy by indira gandhi and indian congress party and Margret thatcher + conservative party to tarnish the Sikhs at covert level. At home in india and aboard in the Uk, Canada, USA they are secretly actively plotting away. Even to this day the corrupt Indian establishment along with corrupt British establishment are plotting away to cause problems so that Sikhs never regain their sovereignty or voice in world political affairs about how their community is suffering without a homeland speaking up on their behalf. https://sikhsiyasat.net/2018/07/13/declassified-secret-documents-reveal-british-government-snubbed-sikh-voice-after-november-1984/ https://thewire.in/diplomacy/released-op-blue-star-files-uk-trade-deals https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/diaspora/uk-papers-reveal-bid-to-ban-protests-after-bluestar/619755.html https://scroll.in/latest/886332/margaret-thatchers-government-wanted-to-ban-protests-by-british-sikhs-after-operation-blue-star

I'm 95% sure the chattisinghpora kashmir sikhs massacare was committed by salafi jihadi muslims the global pan islamic caliphate wanting types not the kashmiriyat independence groups. Those who have confessed in the massacre come from pakistan and were young men from poor families brainwashed by kafirphobic mullahs to fight non-believers not to free an independent democratic muslim but secular kashmir but to establish khalifa islamic sharia rule over kafirs lands. So the funders of those jihadi's would probably be the mullah controlled jamat-i-islamia or affiliates based in pakistan that preach this type of nonsense in madrasses. As for the recent attack on Afghan Sikh religious and Pakistani Sikh political figures in pakistan again I would link that to jamat-i-islamia sponsored groups and individuals and not the pakistani taliban (TTP). TTP leaders have always stated their war is with the pakistani state and army not religious minorities. The afghan taliban is given support from pakistani intelligence agency but afghan taliban themselves are targeted by Islamic state khorasan group. So whoever is funding IS-K also funded the attack on kashmiri Sikhs back in march 2000. Sikhs need to find out who the funders are and bring them to justice for their crimes against our people.

Your right, polygamy is a valid concept of marriage in Sikhi as per Sikh history and traditions. It is just liberal politically correct low IQ morons who refuse to accept that some Guru Sahiban's and majority of Sikhs had more than one wife back in the days just for sheer survival of the community also culturally and religiously it was accepted practice because when the men went off to battle and some were killed the women left behind would be vulnerable to be attacked by the enemy, kidnapped and raped to produce more muslims just as what happened in 1947. The muslim jihadi enemy always kills the males first than kidnaps the women to rape or reproduce with. You can even see it happening in afghanistan, pakistan and kashmir right now. So having multiple wives gave respectability to singleton women to get married at least and have chance to have kids especially those whose family could not find a male partner for them because the gender male to female demographic ratio was shewed so much so that women were in larger majority and there was less and less men with each battle men took part in. So to replenish stock of the Sikh community these brave women gave birth to the struggling community and helped it survived from extinction. Whereas their reproductive abilities via wombs would have gone to waste and their lives spent as spinsters contributing not much to the communities future demographics and survival. Polygamy would make sense in punjab right now if there was gender demographics were the same as the past but its the the opposite way with men outnumbering women. The only way to resolve it would be for Sikh guys to marry and convert christian, hindu and muslim women. And Sikh women were only allowed to marry Sikh men. This is where the muslims have it spot on to take over lands by sheer population number. They have made it very easy to spread their evil dark arab 7th century ideology linked by demographics.

Simple answer is self interest, programmed from childhood to worship and fight for the 1947 British created indian dominion nation rather than defend their spiritual Sikh religion, lack of firm belief (atheist cultural sikhs from liberal families) and money motivation. No real Sikh would attack fellow Sikhs especially any Sikh places of worship. So these fake Sikhs who are in the police, government, intelligence and army are mostly cultural Sikh atheists. Just like many in indian congress party are not Sikhs but just cultural Sikhs like captain amrinder singh. In 1980s many Sikh personnel deserted the punjab police and indian army barracks and killed their enemy indian fellow officers once darbar sahib was attacked. They even commanded tanks to attack parliament in new delhi but were intercepted and taken out by other Indian army tanks and helicopters. Had Sikhs had a firm military plan to attack military installations, army barracks, new delhi and parliament they could have taken over india rather quickly rather than wait for the enemy come to them like sitting ducks at harmandir sahib. The other mistake Sikhs made was not allying themselves with a superpower like China to aid them in their independence battle. Groups like babbar khalsa and dal khalsa relied on the sly anti-sikh snakey islamic's of pakistani establishment. Who did not militarily come to the aid of Sikhs but sat back and watched and laughed in glee as armed Indians fought and killed each other. Sikhs relied on themselves not realising the world had changed in the modern world you need help of superpowers to achieve your freedom.

No we don't have to respect their belief's we only respect the right for people to believe in what they want to..... that's the difference. E.g One is respecting a person beliefs which could include killing you as a non-believer and treating you with discrimination and contempt like aspects of abrahamic faiths teach. The other is respecting the right for people to hold abhorrent beliefs that you may not agree with but respect the right for the person to hold them though don't have to respect those beliefs yourself. Sikhi and modern day human rights concepts such as freedom of belief teaches you to believe in the later not the first.

Pakistan has strongly condemned the recent attack on the afghan Sikh leadership. And it does seems to me a bit far fetched for indian media and establishment to be making the case that Pakistani ISI is funding and giving orders to armed islamic groups that deliberately target tiny significant powerless religious non-muslim minorities. It would also be against their interests for patriotic pro-pakistani Sikhs or afghan Sikhs to be attacked also it also defames pakistans image in the eyes of non-muslim international community and the global Sikh community especially khalistan minded Sikhs. But maybe it is pakistani ISI or maybe its another foreign power hostile to pakistan's national interests? or Maybe its rogue evil islamic elements within pakistani ISI's funding structure that zealously wants all non-sunni muslims eliminated. So who would be the ones funding these murderers? why do they target peaceful sikh populations who have not harmed the muslim majority in anyway or posed any threat to them. Same thing happened in kashmir march 2000.... bill Clinton went over for a visit and a few days later 40 kashmiri Sikhs were murdered gunned down next to the walls of a gurdwara (https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/31/magazine/a-kashmiri-mystery.html ).... and the following year later 9/11 happened in america. Who in your view is using the lives of innocent Sikhs as a pawn to be played in their geo-political games. I personally don't think its Indian RAW as kashmiri brahmin hindu's were ethnically cleansed from kashmir in 1990s and still unable to return before the kashmiri Sikh massacre happened. It seems the vast majority of funding for these global salafi caliphate wanting Islamic extremists is coming from arab middle east (including salafi saudi and jewish israeli mossad)and/or British and other western intelligence agencies. We need to look back in history who funded the Muslim salafi wahaabi jihadis against Sikhs in 19th century? It was the British intelligence agents who funded the wahaabi sect of islam and thus the indian born sayed bralevi converted to this brand of islam while on hajj there he also received funds from the British to destablish Sikh rule in north west part of the Sikh empire. So this sayed brelvi British funded islamic extremist puppet along with his band of muslim m0rons declared a jihad against Sikhs but were eventually caught and massacred in battle of balakot by the Khalsa army along with help of local muslim pathan tribesmen who had grown tired of his strict islamic and unjust reign of terror on them. Perhaps the clues to the recent attacks on afghan, pakistani and kashmir Sikhs is laying back in history...

more information about what went on

Banda singh bahadhur being a rajput hindu convert to Sikhi for all his faults and flaws as a ordinary human being was a great warrior hero for the Sikh nation. His and the Khalsa's daring adventures and martyrdom eventually lead the path for sikh misls to establish themselves by more daring hit and run attacks on various anti-sikh authorities and within a few decades Sikhs had come together to establish the Sikh empire along with 5 other Sikh kingdom states. If it wasn't for banda singh bahadhur sirhind and various hostile muslim occupied area's would never have got destroyed the muslim populations would never have got forced to run away, be slain in warfare or forced to convert to sikhi and thus Sikhs would have been finished by playing too politically correct being too nice in the face of extreme persecution and extermination by the enemy. I noticed one thing about hindu converts to Sikhi they tend to be alot more fierce towards Islam and its hostile populations. Whereas Sikhs born into Sikh households tend to be alot more easy going, pluralistic and neutral or balanced when it comes to Islam and dealing with muslims. In times of hostile muslim populations then these type of Sikh converts are very useful but when its times of diplomacy, peace and co-existence they can be a liability as they tend to be still bitter and hateful towards muslims.

That's true also, also i think they also like to virtue signal pretending to be a "better person" for not calling out or identifying the enemy trying to kill or harm innocent members of their own community bit like how modern day politicians think and speak in public. Fear of wrong reaction often paralyses their consciousness from speaking out.

Abrahamic cult leaders and preachers in the indian subcontinent use dirty tactics to get people to convert So muslims use violence, intimidation and discrimination whereas Christians use free medicine and illicit drugs and offers of free money to get the poor people (who are great in number and thus great vote bank) to convert. To resolve the problem why people find it hard to convert to Sikhi is first identify the barriers to conversion.What prevents people from converting? Often the case is made that in order to convert they have to keep kesh and take amrit that the kesh/turban is a liability no longer suitable in the modern world there's no incentives to become a keshdhari whereas when Sikhs had their own states and political power if you were a mona or didnt have kesh and turban you werent taken seriously and didnt have much influence in society. Other barriers are wrong interpretations of Sikhi .....the liberal fake sikh political correct m0rons have given the perception that Sikh scripture teaches that all other faiths are fine to follow so there's so no point being a sikh or converting to Sikhi. Whereas gurbani states the opposite view that its ok to be followers of other faiths as long as you follow the Sikhi interruption of what is a good person and a good deed and if your faith does not make you that good person or gives wrong deeds as good deeds (ie killing innocent non-believers, believing human being like jesus is God, believing in brahmin hindu priests and their black magic/palm reading, ritual painful slaughter of animals) then its best to follow Sikhi.

He is not tough enough on the real culprits he is in bed with saudis and israel. Both regimes have been funding jihadi's and causing world wide terror attacks to further their and co-opted western interests. The countries he should have banned is qatar, saudi and israel. The abrahmic cult regimes and their majority populations counties are a curse and plague on humanity and the earth.

From my observations it is apparent that most Sikhs are so politically correct so cucked that they are unable to see the facts staring them in the face and inability of speaking out against attacks targeting the Sikh community these days. They are quite happy to stay slient not drawn attention to the plight of their community if it means rocking the boat or offending someone. E.g UK muslim grooming/conversion rape gangs targetting vulnerable non-muslim girls scandal that has gone on for decades Bullying of turbanned Sikh school kids making it hard for them to have a confident childhood and upbringing Attacks by islamic extremists / jihadis on innocent Sikh or other non-muslim communities Attacks by Indian government or hindu extremists on Sikhs I put it down to usually having the fear of offending their muslim or hindu friends/ neighbours for speaking out against injustices on their community. Feeling if they did speak out they would have bad relations or be tarred as being some how racist or anti- the other group. Yet most muslims feel quite free to express their solidarity with other musilms suffering at the hands of non-muslims or western/eastern or even their muslim governments.

My friend tells me that its true the dawahist muslims in uk have stepped up dawah conversion stalls to be practically in your face outside shopping area's. Giving away "free qurans" the same is probably true with christians evangelists they are giving away free bibles and literature. Gotta hand it to them the Abrahamic cults have got a slick propaganda operation unlike dharmic faiths. One has to wonder and ask themselves how do they fund this? the muslim dawahists probably get their funding from charity money they stole and get funding from middle east rich muslim financiers. While the christians probably from the vatican mega rich bank. UK Sikhs have nothing apart from basics of sikhi (giving parchar literature now and then) stalls and Sikh s.e.v.a charity basically free food for homeless (wasting the community resources without giving parchar) stalls.