crayzy

none of us believes what we do for no reason - we're gonna have to agree to disagree and honestly, no one is going to change their mind over what they read on a forum.

then why should we follow this blokes agenda

what is senchiya>?

i thought nau nidh were supernatural treasures...How caome they are considered more desireable than ridh sidh? CAn someone also say what Ridh Sidh are and why Nau Nidh are considered better?

Adi Granth Sahib = the first Granth Sahib, which Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave Gurgaddi to. Dasam Granth Sahib = collection of Guru Gobind Singh Ji's writings, and revered as equal to Guru Granth Sahib by some Sikhs, whereas others claim it to contain false info... its a big debate...lets not turn this thread into a debate.

supanai aaeiaa bhee gaeiaa mai jal bhariaa roe || In a dream, He came, and went away again; I cried so many tears.

all you need is a font to use in word or openword or wae you use. You can download one from sikhitothemax, put it in your fonts folder, double click, and its installed.

try deleting all cookies and temporary internet files. If that doesn't work try a different browser.

wonder how he got his doctorate with his poor grasp of english grammar.

blatisingh why dont you tell us a story...I gather from other thrads you're a Rara Sahib sevak...and you said on SA that you have read the book about Suleman... share the knowledge =)

It goes deeper: yes..." john smith" was the best name the could come up with??? Our good doctor has bad grammar and a tendency for melodrama too...a bollywood fan perhaps... This is shameful...who the heck would go to such lengths. Trying to promote the 'truth' of Sikhism by lying...fun apparently they have access to his hotmail account....to an atheist called "Ali"...

also mention dilution of definitions os Sikhism and the character of Guru Nanak Dev Ji in schools - state sponsored misinformation dissolve the identity of Sikhs.

Bhai Rama Singhs book is not the only place - listen to the suleman recordings, I remeber someone saying theres a book about the suleman thing as well expalining more detail. At the end of the day you have a logical hypothesis, but the idea that hell and jamdoot exist has more empirical evidence, which for religious issues is extremely rare. No doubt in my mind.

i think there was a description of hell in the suleman tape.

It is manmat to show shakti. Sant Isher SIngh Ji had left panj bhootak chola, Jathedar Mohinder Singh Ji offered help, Sant Jarnail Singh ji turned it down...Jathedarji referred to Sant Ji as 'poora soorma' long before any of the trouble started. True sants left it to happen coz a) they are veparvah b) they live according to Wahegurus hukam c) Look at the revival in Sikhi created by the attacks - it was good for the panth that they happened they way they did. You think Sant Jarnail Singh didnt have the shakti to win the battle? - Its written in Gurbani that God does our bhalla and we dont recognise it. As far as your other claims Suniai Dookh Paap ka naas. If you do a real ardas with pure sharda, and if paat is done with pure jugti then nothing can overturn it.

each to their own Bahadur Shah asked Guru Gobind Singh Ji who's Dharam is better, Guruji replied "tumko tumara khoob, ham ko hamara khoob" i.e. yours is beautiful to you, mine is beautiful to me.

The truth is immortal = Sat Sri Akal

no need Its microsoft software they may as well give you a virus download

yes, we're not supposed to show enmity against anyone as Sikhs

Sant Ji wanted Khalistan only in the event that human rights abuses were not recognised and stopped by the Indian govt. as far as quotes all I can think of right now is: "Raaj na chahu, mukt na chahu, man preet charan kamalarae"

Does anyone knoe where he wrote this, what article/book? Thanks edit: Ive searched a lot of his books and google, the only websites that mention Russell and Sikhism in the same sentence are Sikh websites. I'm beginning to think someone totally made this up

Is Guru Sahib not with you outside the darbaar?

Its the plume on Guru Jis turban

He bowed down to get amrit from 5 Sikhs - and said wherever there are 5 Sikhs recognise that the Guru is there. Individually we are supposed to be humble, not walk around telling ourselves that we are kings. If indeed a Sikh is a king then ask yourself on what level are you a Sikh? How many true 100% Gursikhs like e.g. Baba Nand Singh Ji are there. If people like him didnt wear kalgi how can we step up and start wearing it. Just like any royal; court the son of the King cannot wear the crown of the King.

because are Guru Gobind Singh jis sevadars - kalgi is the mark of a King, we are slaves of the king. Together we are his roop, individually we are not.