Rsinghji

hanji, i think it would be good if we could listen to something, then if you could upload the good quality recordings when you have time. thanks

yeh safe lol

oh singh, u got our hopes up!

http://media.waheguroo.com/Akhand_Keertan/...Singh_Jee_1.mp3

.

very good point shamsher about those who do not accept raagmala! also those who do not accept ratanmala as bani are not true sikhs! fair enough shamsher? another good point, all must read rag mala and ratanmala to call themselves true sikhs and not be ram rayas. uhem

"tarrandeep kaur" if you have the time, please ask on akj.org and tapoban.org if bleaching is bujjar kurehit or tankaah. this way we can both have a confirmed answer. thank you.

im not saying bleaching is ok, just making another point: why do people make up their own rules on bujjar kurehits? even though bleaching isnt gurmat and your against it, dont make it a bujjar kurehit. bleaching is tankaah for amritdharis (which is a big thing by the way) bujjar kurehit is the removal of hair, no need to make up extra rules for these 4 main kurehits. even though bleaching is manmat, its actually tankaah not bujjar klurehit, doesnt matter how much you want it to be. but i hope the tankaah bit makes it obvious that bleaching is manmat. so anyway bleaching when amrtidhari, i would think one still has to go to the punj as its tankaah, just like jhoot. just wanted to point out that little part. carry on giving your views pls.

do some research in gurbani, the answer to that question will be very very clear! in fact no need for extensive research, just take 5/10 random shabads from sikhitothemax, im sure even that will answer this question. the answer is very obvious.

fatehji http://www.akj.org/multimedia/Sydney/2005/...0ausa021wed.mp3 (ausi smagam 2005)

:mellow: gurbir singh will not attend rhensbhai

does anyone know where kirtan from the recent smagam is available?

thats right techno singh http://www.ikirtan.com/Bhai_Harpreet_Singh...preetsingh5.wmv http://www.ikirtan.com/Akhand_Kirtan_Smaga...sday_Part_1.mp3 http://www.ikirtan.com/Akhand_Kirtan_Smaga...sday_Part_2.mp3

ur thoughts on jamdhoot are abit wrong. theyre not something u need to learn to defend against with weapons, u will encounter them at the time of death. they don't haunt u and scare u like ghosts, demons etc these jamdhoots are beings in the afterlife. gurbani says naam is the only protection from these jamdhoots. they arent scary creatures on this planet where a sarbloh kirpaan will be needed, these jamdhoots are actually horrific messengers of DEATH and u will enounter them only at the time of death. however they are scared of gurmukhs, so let us jap naam and follow bani!

could someone please post the levels of sangat according to gurbani, thank you

ur right sarpanch there is hardly any love left in our gurdware, theres even youth smacking a muslim in the head with a kara just cos he came to a gurdwara. these ppl will endure horrific sajaa in dargah

thanks for sharing that paapi, this is similar to "dukh dharoo sukh rog payaa" shabadh. when in distress this is when we look to waheguroo for help!

if the punj were all gurmukhs but later one left the path of sikhi, then u r still amritdhari of course. but if when u took amrit one or more was already patit as an example then u need to take amrit from the true punj pyare.

sometimes guru gives us sajaa, maybe it is a sign that u r lacking in some area(s) of gurmat

could whoever preaching to me actually come out with their own username and not mislead sangat. if u want to dictate ur views to me or anyone else, then u shouldn't have to hide under someone elses username. but if u seriously feel the need to remain anon, then do as u please.

umm where did u hear sarbloh bibek is rehit of satguru? and did u bother to c who actually says it is guru's rehit? if all rehitnamas were verifed then the whole panth would follow each rehitnama. you're dicating that sarbloh is guru's rehit. if this was a known fact then all jathe would follow this! y do u make such a bold statement, when u know it is not in guru granth and they were written after guru gobind singhs time and it is not even verified as accurate writings of a gurmukh who has all knowledge of these things? if all your own punj pyare dont keep sarbloh rehit then what difference will it make if you are planning to keep it in future? my punj certainly didnt mention anything about sarbloh rehit (even though jatha organised it!), and only the granthi was sarbloh bibeki. however i'm sure they all had true bibek according to gurbani. it is upto us if we want to follow bibek of guru sahibs, or bibek of some writings in some rehitnama, u certainly have told me what u think about it. listening to friends, family or whoever doesnt mean ur 100% right and can preach to us that this is defo guru's rehit. that's wrong! as someone who believes this to 100% without doubt (not sure y though hmm) be satguru's rehit, i wish u good luck to be sarbloh bibeki one day. thanks for your views even though it did seem slightly like u were suggesting your views were 100% correct, like boldly saying yes sarbloh rehit is the gurus rehit and that i have to accept it. if i knew sarbloh rehit was that of satguru's, i would make every effort to keep straight after amrit, so i really don't need anyone telling me i have to accept this is something to work on. this does sound like preaching to me, and you admitted u dont keep it EVEN THOUGH u r sure it is guru's rehit. so i think u should accept u havent fully committed to the guru if ur going to be relaxed on this so called guru's rehit. whereas i no this isnt a certain rehit and it is not hukum of satguru/punjpyare. u said ur not preaching or telling anyone to keep sarbloh rehit YET u tell me i have to accpet i need to work on it. this is contradictory. Anyway u showed judgment on me, and im sorry i didnt have enough nirmataa to keep quiet, and it seems i have responded to ur judging behaviour, i do apoligse and hope maharaj blesses me with full nirmataa!!! fateh gurmukh pyario ji

why make a claim that sarbloh bibek is gurus rehit? guru granth sahib is our guru, and that is the true bibek explained in gurbani. please show the rehitnama of sarbloh bibek for those who are interested, but this rehit isnt verifed as the guru's rehit. so please do not say that sarbloh bibek is the guru's rehit otherwise like the above sikh said we aren't a whole sikh unless we follow rehit. also one shouldn't preach something if they don't do it themselves as said by satguru: rhq Avr kCu Avr kmwvq ] rehath avar kashh avar kamaavath || He says one thing, and does something else. min nhI pRIiq muKhu gMF lwvq ] man nehee preeth mukhahu ga(n)dt laavath || There is no love in his heart, and yet with his mouth he talks tall. jwnnhwr pRBU prbIn ] jaananehaar prabhoo parabeen || The Omniscient Lord God is the Knower of all. bwhir ByK n kwhU BIn ] baahar bhaekh n kaahoo bheen || He is not impressed by outward display. Avr aupdysY Awip n krY ] avar oupadhaesai aap n karai || One who does not practice what he preaches to others, Awvq jwvq jnmY mrY ] aavath jaavath janamai marai || shall come and go in reincarnation, through birth and death Sarbloh bibek may bring focus to your mind, which there is obviously no harm in doing so, but people shouldn't preach this is the true rehit of satguru!

kirtan isnt finished, so y u surfing the net? tut tut

kool, will that be audio or vid?

there are many youngsters who go on the southall coach for rhensbhais, so dont worry.