Akalifauj

Singh, do your research on the Bikrami Calendar. It is not a Hindu Calendar. It has been used for centuries and even our Gurus used it. Evidence is in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji, Chaupai Sahib. Dhumma is a hindu because of his intentions. The Muslims gave the veda followers the name Hindu, which means theif. By this standard Dhumma is a Hindu. He is a thief who steals money from the poor. If you want material on the Bikrami calendar I can provide it to you. The so called Nanakshahi Calendar is not accurate or makes any sense. The start date is picked at random and Purewal admitted it himself in a discussion forum among Jathedars of the Takhts. The missionaries have used scare tactics to push the Purewal calendar on Sikhs.

Anyone who stands by DamDami Taksal started by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji says Sant Jarnail Singh ji Khalsa is the current Jathedar. The fake, corrupted, and weak hearted have gone astray from Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's DamDami Taksal. The bachans of Sant Baba Thakur Singh ji Khalsa have come true in the past and they hold true today.

What pure core teachings of the Koran are you referring too? From reading Gurbani (Bachittar Natak and Bhagats Bani) we can see the Gurus are no different than Akal Purakh. Yet Muhammad was only seen as a messenger who failed in his mission (Bachittar Natak). The Koran has never been given the title Satgur ki Bani nor has it's so called pure core teachings ever been given the title by the Gurus as Satgur Ki Bani. The Bhagats reached the realm of Sachkhand only after been given Satgur ki kirpa by Satguru Nanak Dev ji. Bhagat Bani was only accepted as Satgur ki Bani after being approved by Satguru Nanak Dev ji. No one has the right to label anything as pure in the context of equating it to Gurbani teachings other than Satguru Nanak Dev ji. Nothing is pure as Gurbani. Nothing in anything or anywhere. Gurbani is one of a kind and nothing can equate to it or even have an ounce of similarity to it. Simply saying, practice truth is not pure core teachings of Akal Purakh; its not Gurbani. A person can interpret this according to their upbringing and/or based on their culture (we know how this turns out in the world). Same goes for saying there is one God. The Muslims and Christians all believe in one God but they can't agree on what this one God is. Those who read Gurbani and practice Gurbani start to see a glimpse of Naam in everything. Many times in Gurbani, Guru Sahib has said I see Naam everywhere including the vedas, yet Guru Sahib says the vedas are stuck in the 3 gunas and don't know about the fourth state (how to reach Akal Purakh). These blanketed statements don't help anyone. Not the one saying them or the one who is listening or the one who get's excited over hearing them.

If this is the only evidence needed why do you continue to write more and state the below statements? You have made assumptions and I believe you don't see what assumptions you are making. Let me help you here. You say: Where in Gurbani does it say a Shaheed who has reached Sachkand can stop practicing truth? Where does this doubt/separation/stop practicing truth come from in the Shaheeds mind if he is truly in sachkhand (one with Akal Purakh)? Again provide Gurbani specific shabads so we can explore the reality of Gurbani and not someones opinion on shaheeds. You saying Gurbani says to do simran 24/7 is not evidence for your earlier claims. If it is, then I can say the world is moving around the sun because the grizzly bear roars on top of the mountains. A person with less intelligence can say the earth moves because the grizzly bear scares it into moving or the earth moves around the sun because the grizzly bears is the master of the earth and the bear wanted to sleep so the sun will stop shinning on the grizzly bears side.

Is there any evidence to back up what you have said above? No one should accept the above without evidence.

The Gurus ( Gurbani) does not say to be a good Muslim in the context of the Koran. When Gurbani speak of Muslims to be good it mean to go back to the original meaning of what Muslim means; to submit to God. English translations do not do justice to what the Gurus have said. Please learn Gurmukh and find out for yourself what the Gurus have said.

For the 100 time, did dhunda say the 3 nitnem bani are written by Guru Sahib?

I see where you are going with this....more sangat will start believing in Dasam Banis, but I disagree because honesty trumps everything. Satguru wants us to be truthful. Dhunda did not say it is Guru Sahib kirt, then don't report it as he said (I even pm singhstation as they refuse to repsond openly). If we start using these methods of trickery, then we are no better than the Muslims. It may create infighting among missionaries, but again it will be based on falsely reporting what Dhunda said. Majority of the sangat are confused on what Dhunda believes of the three nitnem Banis. And by singhstation's false report, the sangat will start favoring him more, when he did not say it. Only the hardcore fanatical missionaries will go against him, who are few in numbers. When majority of the sangat are presented with honest questions and reports of who these missionaries are. They start to doubt the missionary parcharaks and even decide to stop listening to them. We (the Khalsa) do not need to issue false reports to win over anyone. Honesty is the method we are given and that's what we will use. And if anyone wants to join the manmat group after being provided evidence. Take it as Maharaj's Hukam, but that will not stop us from spreading Gurmat and challenging those who spread falsehood. Hard work pays off and is satisfying. With trickery a Sikh is without the Guru and is always looking over his shoulder, hoping and praying it does not backfire.

It takes strength to let strangers know your life story. Many will judge, laugh, mock him, but majority will appreciate his story and maybe a young kid going in the bad direction can change his ways after watching this video. Thanks for Yog Singh and Basics of Sikhi for putting this video into the public.

Singhstation has falsely reported Dhunda says the 3 nitnem Banis are penned by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji. If anyone disagrees show me where. Another member has watched the video and agrees with me. Let's be honest with our post and not beat around the bush because we favor certain sites, people, or organizations.

Could you not figure this question out for yourself? If a person is truly concerned they would watch the video themselves and read the article to see what is going on. I know I read the article and watched the video. I put in the time, what about you? Such a simple question could be answered by putting in the time and effort. So once you put in the effort let us know what conclusion you come up with.

Look at this translation. They don't even translate ouchar Hai and leave it out. By the above translation the tuk stops at:jae ham ko paramaesar. And then moves on to the next tuk.

Let's look at the line carefully. ਜੋ ਹਮ ਕੋ ਪਰਮੇਸਰ ਉਚਰਿ ਹੈਂ ॥ ਤੇ ਸਭ ਨਰਕਿ ਕੁੰਡ ਮਹਿ ਪਰਿਹੈਂ ॥ The third word in the first tuk means, to say. The word ਉਚਰਿ means in speech(to speak), to explain but interpreting the word as explain, to speak makes no sense also Guru Sahib doesn't know how to put together a sentence!!! Also the tuk would be complete at ਪਰਮੇਸਰ if we interpret it as those who say I (guru sahib) am Vaheguru. There would be no need to add the last two words. I believe in this context considering all of the bani before and after. This tuk is saying: who says I (Guru Sahib) is higher(does praise higher of Guru Sahib and singles him out as stand alone without Vaheguru) than Vaheguru. Look at Guru Sahib saying Krishna elected himself as God, which says Krishna is higher than Vaheguru.

Singhstation should not be allowed to spread their falsehood here. Mods and Admins need to step in and ask them provide the information asked or write an apology for their mistake and misleading sangat.

Those who equate Krishna or Raam to any of the ten Gurus or hold them to the same high seat are trying to spread the worship of the dead. Krishna indulged in maya. Show me where any of the Gurus who fell into Maya? Krishna took on maya as his identity? Both Sri Guru Granth sahib ji and Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji present this reality. Show me where in Gurbani it says the Gurus took on maya as their identity? The Gurus said Vaheguru you are my father and mother. And Krishna says Vasudev is my father which shows he was stuck in maya and couldn't see the forest for the trees.

Never once does Dhunda in the whole video say the 3 nitnem Banis from Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji are written by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji. He only says I follow Sri Akal Takht Sahib Rehat maryada and this is the only reason why I read 3 Nitnem Banis from Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. In his later videos he says, when the time comes, we (missionaries) can change the Sri Akal Takht Sahib maryada. Pointing to how the 3 nitnem Banis will be removed. Stop promoting falsehood through your website; singhstation. If you disagree, point to exactly where Dhunda says the 3 nitnem Banis from Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji are written by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji?

Gurbani says the following about Naam and mukhti: so har jan naam dhhiaaeidhaa har har jan eik samaan || That humble servant of the Lord meditates on the Naam, the Name of the Lord; the Lord, and the Lord's humble servant, are one and the same. ang 652 The atma (soul) merges with Vaheguru through Naam and becomes one with Vaheguru. Read the above provided lines, Guru Sahib says it clearly. Anyone who has doubts read the whole salok on ang 652 of Sri Guru Raam Das ji. Life is too short to make up all these theories of how to obtain mukhti. Simply read Gurbani and the answers are right there. Life is not an exam where the material of how to attain mukhti is hidden from the learner at the time of the exam. Although some try to benefit financially by fooling others it is. Satguru gave us Gurbani; the direct answers to all of our problems. Today computers have made reading Gurbani even easier by providing search engines that allow for anyone to look up certain words and phrases in Gurbani.

Sikh means disciple of Sri Guru Granth sahib ji in the context of Sikhi.

Clearly the Sikh women were not punj pyare. Punj pyare were behind the Singhs with the Nishan sahibs. What would the 40 mukta think in this moment. They were told by their wives and daughters to go back and fight or we are going. So why can't bibian walk in front? Whoever took the bibian out by force needs to pay for their wrong doing immediately. This cannot be tolerated. Swift action needs to be taken. Bibian cam stand before Guru Sahib with weapons and the Khalsa flag. The organizers who went against the bibian are no Sikhs. Vaheguru is forgiving but I hope Vaheguru makes them pay for it.

Showing a gun on a flag is not a sign of aggression. Khalsa Panth always stays armed....kirpan is not a symbol. It is there for protection. Sikhs always have peaceful celebration yet Guru Sahib did not take off his weapons. Sri Guru Granth sahib ji does not teach against weapons nor does Guru Sahib dislike the sight of weapons or think the sight of weapons are a sign of aggression. The Canadian army who were part of the vasaikhi celebration brought a cannon. No one complained and said this a no meaning and it's a peaceful protest. Sikhs in fact welcomed them with open arms.

If Dhunda cannot even say my father's Banis are Sri Jaap Sahib, Sri Tvad Parsad Swaiyve, and Sri Chaupai Sahib. How can he say my father is Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji? In reality he is fatherless. Which translates into he has no Guru in Sikhi context. Dhunda dodged every question and his chela with his loud mouth helped him cower out of answering questions. Dr. Harbhajan Singh, when allowed to answer, provided depth answers that both of them could not counter. From this video, it came clear Dhunda does not even accept the Sikh Rehat Marayada, he so famously claims to believe in. When Dhunda was told in the Sikh Rehat Marayada it says to accept all ten Gurus Bani, he did not answer with a simple yes as any Sikh will answer, I accept all ten Gurus Bani. Instead he dodged the statement and says the Sixth Master never wrote any Banis. What kind of an answer is that. Is this guy thick headed? When asked is Sri Jaap Sahib, Sri Tvad Parsad Swaiyve and Sri Chaupai Sahib Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's Bani? He beats around the bush and never answers the question. Say for example he was asked, is Sri Jap ji Sahib Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji Bani? He would answer with a yes and would not answer by saying, I have to accept it because currently the Sikh Rehat Maryada from Sri Akal Takht Sahib says I have to accept it. This shows a double standard for the same Gurus Bani. Providing the answer he does not accept Shabad Guru as his Guru and is without a Guru. Dhunda's chela cutting off Dhunda was another example of how cunning these guys are. He purposely cut off his master, which gave Dhunda the chance of not answering questions and get caught in his lies. When provided with video evidence of Dhuna using slander toward Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. He says, why do we need to see this now. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji stood on practicing truthful living. Dhunda should learn from the great Guru of the Sikhs.

Tell me where this is from, Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji or Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji? eyk ik®snµ srb dyvw dyv dyvw q Awqmw ] eaek kirasana(n) sarab dhaevaa dhaev dhaevaa thaathamaa || The One Lord Krishna is the Divine Lord of all; He is the Divinity of the individual soul. You complain about Dhunda not having the freedom to speak his mind. This is false because he has countless youtube videos where he speaks his mind and then retracts what he says because the crowd would reject his views. He also has been caught joining two separate tuks of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji on different angs in an question and answer session. Yet his supporters never spoke up against him. It took a Singh who accepts Gurbani of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji to point out his mistake. So who respect Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji more? Sri Charitorpakyan comes at the end of Sri Dasam Granth Sahib. When a child comes of age, he or she will be introduced to the teachings of Sri Charitorpakhyan. If you have a problem with Sri Charitorpakhyan, pull your child out of middle school because students are sexist and speaking about sex at a young age and even the schools teach about sex. I would rather have my Guru teach my children about the dangers of kaam than have some manmukh. The stories in Sri Charitorpakhyan are there to influence a person away from adultery, sex acts before marriage, falling for the opposite sex as the be all and end all, not devaluing the strength of women, not accepting every decision made at face value, the punishment for falling to kaam, how the world around you is going to behave around you because they fully indulge in maya, etc. Sant Maskeen Singh ji said, those who can't read Sri Charitorpakhyan without being ashamed are the problem and not Sri Charitorpakhyan. He used harsh words, but I will not because mod's will think I am using that tone. According to your post, I can understand you did not even grasp the ability of how Guru Sahib used Devi and devta names in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji or Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. Here is a direct question to see how much hindophobhia you have. Was any of the Devi or Devta saved? If so, who and where did you get your information from? Very basic and simple question for those who contemplate over Gurbani. Let's see if you even attempt to answer this question. We, who accept Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji as Guru Sahib Bani, do not hide any shabads of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji from the sangat because it will disapprove what I as a lowly insect is saying. Dhunda and co. are famously known for this act. When directly challenged they run off or show up 3 hours late to a discussion and have one of their supporters purposely cause a chaos to end the discussion. Honest men do not hide from discussion. If Dhunda was following the teachings of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji, he would not be scared of open discussions.

How does the Sikh sangat correct this going forward? I think sitting down with these fellows should be the first course of action. Some educated Sikhs in Gurbani should approach them and have a discussion to rectify the mistake they are making. Mostly it's one or two trouble makers and rest are bandwagon junkies who need to be educated.

Your attempt at trying to mock the use of cannabis is a fail. Cocaine is the drug that wakes the body up and gives people false bravery.........makes them feel like the biggest baddest guy out there. Cannabis does the opposite. It mellows a person out and makes them lazy, more likely to not care and enjoy the moment. No buzz from canabis. I got all this info from picking up a book and reading it. Reading books is a good thing, we learn something. Shaheedi Degh is ONLY used for battle. There is another drink called Shardii, which is similar but minus the cannabis. This drink has a lot of nutrients and everyone should be drinking it, other than nut allergy people. Cannabis was used to decrease the pain for warfare wounds and is the safest drug. Drinking Shaheedi Degh on a regular basis is called an addiction to cannabis. Much like people who are hooked to cha or over the counter drugs...........popping Tylenol like eating smarties.

Sounds to me you are either not a Sikh or born in a Sikh family and don't follow the religious beliefs. According to Sikhi God has set up a system to judge whether a person's actions are within the teachings of the Guru or done by the mind desires. A Sikh is only a Sikh if, he follows the teachings of the ten Gurus and Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. Anyone can live as they want, but this being a Sikh forum the person is not wanting secular advice. If the poster held your beliefs he would not even post here in the first place. He would feel satisfied with his decision and hold no doubts. There is only one God. You have never met him to say what he will accept or deny or whether he judges. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji is Vaheguru. Therefore we have the teachings of God and they don't agree with any of what you have stated. Your beliefs are your beliefs, but they can never be said to be the teachings of God. They may sound logical and rational to you and those who have similar values. When a person reads Gurbani and understands what God says the picture comes clear to follow the Guru's instructions, which includes to keep hair uncut.